[ad_1]
C Some newsrooms are negotiating Covington's Catholic fiasco.
The speech that an elderly Native American man was harassed this weekend by a group of white racist high school students at the March for Life collapsed, leaving some news agencies in search all that they can to justify inciting riot online. train against a group of Kentucky teenagers.
The New York Daily News, for example, published an article this week accusing Covington Catholic students of wearing a "black face" for a sports event at a high school.
"SEE: Covington Catholic High School students in black at the past basketball game," reads the New York Daily News. According to the report, a photo "allegedly showed Covington Catholic high school students dressed in a blackface at a 2015 basketball game was tweeted on Twitter Monday morning amidst the controversy of the March of Indigenous Peoples of last week ".
The Daily News seems to be misidentified. The year of the photo, which probably dates from 2012.
"The photo depicts several white students, some with black faces, shouting against an opposing black player," the report says. While the origins of the photo could not be verified, the official YouTube account of Covington Catholic High School released a video highlighting her basketball school spirit, as well as several clips, including one of 2012 , featuring participants boasting a dark voice, a parody of the opposing players. "
The video was removed Monday from the YouTube page of the Kentucky School.
" The black painting of the whole body worn by students in the official video of the school looks a lot like that of the students on the photo broadcast on social media, "continues the newspaper Daily News.Photo, not in blackface, carries a logo that also reflects the Covington's Emblem. "
Adding to the most visible teen of the March for Life video this weekend," That's not going to help the Kentucky student, Nick Sandmann & # 39; s
All right, here are some remarks: all First, to suggest that students do some kind of minstrel show by making fun of the opposing team, this may seem like an exaggerated act. The photos of Covington clearly illustrate a "black-out" game, in which participants are invited to dress completely in one color to support their team. The picture shows everyone dressed in black. It also shows that some students painted their whole body (not only their faces) in black.
Occam razor, people. Either these kids did their best to promote the designated color for that particular game, or they publicly targeted an opposing team with extremely racist antics. It is possible that Covington's teens in this photo have adopted an extremely racist behavior, but perhaps wait for someone to confirm that it's exactly what's going on. went here before accusing them of the worst. A rush to a judgment based on incomplete information is what brought us here in the first place.
Secondly, what does the New York Daily News mean: "It will not help the case of Nick Sandmann, a student from Kentucky"? There is no case. Sandmann says he has neither harassed nor abused an elderly old American Indian in the capital. Sandmann was in elementary school by the time the Covington Basketball Photo was taken.
Does the Daily News suggest that some students may have behaved badly? In the past, Sandmann probably behaved so badly? This is solid reasoning.
Finally, let's acknowledge the Daily News report for what it is: a newsroom looks for something after the fact to justify its earlier rush to paint The story alleging that Covington students had intimidated a Native American protester was based on one incomplete video, which proved almost immediately wrong. But instead of admitting a mistake, some making the not-so-subtle attempt to prove that Covington is a bad school and that, therefore, teenagers wearing a MAGA hat this weekend are also bad people, and that So it's okay to gang up on them and intimidate them.
Stand-up comedian Jeremy McLellan explains the motivation behind the poor Daily News follow-up report.
"We have now reached the stage of" negotiating "the" 5 stages of grief that you shared an Internet hoax ", which is to move to smaller claims to try to justify the initial crowd. The most intelligent ones completely abandon the truth and turn to "the broader context" he writes . "The common point of each of these" markets "is that it diverts the discussion of the original (false) allegation that triggered the crowd on the Internet. PLEASE, ACCEPT THEM, THIS ARE BAD. But if it is not the original claim original it is a negotiation. "
" Well, if he was bad anyway, or if he had done something wrong, or was just a bad group, what was the harm? "Most people think of this In the meantime, our souls are decomposing. "
[ad_2]
Source link
