[ad_1]
The court order restores the daily fine imposed on the corporation by Chief Justice John Roberts while the full court considered the matter. This is an apparent loss to society and marks the first foray of the entire court in the Mueller investigation.
The order will encourage the company to disclose information to the grand jury or otherwise cooperate with Mueller, as the contempt fines continue to accumulate.
The company will have to pay $ 50,000 a day until it complies with the law by providing information, said the DC Circuit in a notice released Tuesday. These fees have not yet accumulated, but they will start now, since the Supreme Court refused Tuesday to freeze them.
The decision of the High Court did not contain any dissent.
In a separate document, the company asked the court to review its case on the merits. The court has not yet ruled on this request.
CNN's Supreme Court analyst, Stephen Vladeck, a law professor at the University of Texas, has stated that it was unlikely that judges would intervene at this stage. "The fact that no judge has publicly noted a dissent from today's order suggests that the Court is inclined to stay out of this litigation" said Vladeck.
All the briefs in the case were filed under seal.
The company objected to the summons of a Washington-based grand jury and was fined every day it disclosed no information. The company wanted the Supreme Court to put the sanctions on hold pending appeal of the lower court's opinion.
In its judgment against the company, the Court of Appeal stated that its application fell under an exception to the Foreign Sovereign Immunity Act which prohibits foreign governments from being sued in US courts. The court also found that the company did not demonstrate that the law of its own country prohibited compliance.
generally kept secret , unless a witness decides to talk about subpoenas that he receives or his experience of the deposition.
However, the case has always been one of the most secretive in years to progress in the court system.
There appear to have been two clashes between the prosecutors of the special council office and the private lawyers of the unnamed corporation.
After losing the trial, the DC Circuit Court closed one floor of the courthouse during the pleadings on appeal so as not to reveal the identity of the litigators.
The company kept the secret on almost all of its statements, except for a newspaper indicating when it was submitting information to the court of appeal.
Although the Supreme Court allows such cases to be secret in their original applications, the High Court has never been seized of a known case in which all parties and arguments have remained confidential. .
This story has been updated. 19659020]
[ad_2]
Source link
