[ad_1]
W House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said that President Trump was not invited to present the state of the Union on the date originally scheduled January 29th. The House of Representatives and the Republicans meeting in Congress then questioned the measures to be taken. . Should Trump travel somewhere like the US-Mexico border and deliver his speech? Should he come to Capitol Hill on the 29th and ask to speak? Should he pronounce the address in writing, as has been the case for many years in the history of the country?
Fortunately for Trump, none of these ideas was accepted. Then, when the partial closure of the Government was temporarily resolved, the speaker yielded and invited the President to appear on 5 February. Trump agreed, which, for some Republicans, seemed like a capitulation, but a wise decision. Trump realized that there was simply no alternative as interesting as presenting the state of the Union to the House. The United States government was largely congregated in the interior and millions of viewers watched not only cable news channels but also entertainment channels.
This was especially true with the problem that caused the closure – Trump's proposal regarding the creation of a barrier along some parts of the southern border – still pending. A conference committee between the House and the Senate has a little more than a week to agree on the fence, otherwise the government may well close again. The state of the Union is the best opportunity for Trump to convince the American people that the barrier should be part of a broader border policy. Trump had already tried a prime time address at the nation on Jan. 8, and had failed to move the needle. The state of the Union was his last chance.
But it was also an opportunity to argue a much bigger argument: the results Trump achieved during his presidency and his program for the rest of his term. And Trump made the most of this chance.
The speech was voluminous, not only in length – about 80 minutes – but also in concept. There was a structure. There was a message. There were passages to please all Americans. There were passages to appeal to Trump's conservative base. And he had passages to appeal to opposition Democrats, who otherwise hated almost everything they said.
The most important part of Trump's speech, which seduced all Americans, came after his introduction "Choose Greatness," when he described recent advances in the US economy. "In just over two years after the elections, we launched an unprecedented economic boom – a boom never seen before," said Trump. Then, the details: 5.3 million new jobs; 600,000 manufacturing jobs; salary increase; Americans off food vouchers; low unemployment rate; low unemployment rate of minorities; low unemployment rate for Americans with disabilities; more people working (157 million); lower taxes; an increase in the child tax credit; skyrocketing energy production; deregulation, and more.
Sometimes President Nancy Pelosi, sitting behind the president, did not seem to know what to do. "Pelosi's face during Trump's comments on job growth could not have been more tense," tweeted Miranda Green, a reporter for The Hill. Indeed, Democrats did not have much to say in response to Trump's economic record. They could tap into the numbers – maybe that's really 4.9 million new jobs instead of 5.3 million, or maybe that Trump was applauding the achievements of President Barack Obama – but the fact is that Trump had strong arguments to argue for the performance of the economy his presidency, and he made the first part of his speech.
Immigration, of course, was Trump's call from his base. He presented some of the stories that Democrats hate to hear from Americans who have been killed by illegal immigrants. But in a broader sense, he emphasized that immigration was an employment issue, an economic issue and ultimately a matter of culture and class for millions of Americans. "No problem better illustrates the division between the American working class and the American political class than illegal immigration," Trump said. "Politicians and wealthy donors campaign for the opening of borders while living behind barriers and guards Meanwhile, working-class Americans must pay the price of massive illegal migration: reduced jobs, wages lower, overcrowded schools and hospitals, increased crime and an exhausted social safety net. "
"This is a moral problem," said Trump, during an indirect search at Pelosi, who described his proposal as an "immoral" border fence. ". Trump continued: "We have a moral duty to create an immigration system that protects the lives and jobs of our citizens."
Trump's powerful pro-life message was another direct appeal to his most passionate followers. But Trump was also careful to include issues that would appeal to Democrats, such as lower prescription drug prices, family leave, medical research, and the reform of the criminal sentence. This earned him a loud applause on the Democratic side of the House. But that will probably not do him any good in his dealings with the House, since some of the applauded Democrats will also vote to remove him in an instant. But he still tried.
Part of Trump's plan was to show how far the Democratic Party had moved to the left. A particularly skilful way to do this appeared during Trump's discussion of socialism. After noting the failure of socialism in Venezuela, Trump said: "Here in the United States we are alarmed by new calls to adopt socialism in our country.America was founded on the freedom and independence – and not coercion, domination and control of the government – were born free and we will remain so tonight we renew our determination that America never be a socialist country " .
Some Democrats approved Trump's comments. But others remained impassive. The Republicans in the room were almost beside themselves with pleasure watching these Democrats stay quietly in their shoes. Trump, thought the Republicans, had essentially proposed a test of socialism, and a good part of the Democratic majority failed on national television.
Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, media star of the new Democratic class who also embraces socialism, was irritated by the president's tactics. "I think that in the end, it's not an" ism ", and I think that's exactly what the president is trying to do," he said. Ocasio-Cortez to NBC News after the speech. "I think what he's seen is that he's losing the war on the issues in dispute, so he's going to try to become a homosexual, he's going to try to get away with it." call names … "
How did the public react? Quickie polls by CBS and CNN showed broad approval of Trump's message, but these unscientific polls could have been skewed by too many Trump supporters to be statistically reliable. More reliable polls will come out later, but it's important to remember that public reaction to something like Trump's speech takes a while to dissipate. People who have watched the speech need a little bit of time to decide what they think about it, and those who have not watched the message need to hear the others and to watch the reports to form an opinion.
Still, it seems likely that Trump would have served Tuesday night. He made a broad and broad statement on his approach to the presidency and the country. It was a deeply American call – he uttered the word "America" or "American" 76 times in total in his speech. And there is a reasonable chance that many Americans have liked it.
[ad_2]
Source link
