Trump / Hannity interview: the transcript shows the ignorance of the border crisis



[ad_1]

An interview with Sean Hannity with Donald Trump is always a curious sight, because the interviewer has disavowed journalistic ethics and that the subject has no qualms about lying. The whole affair therefore has the atmosphere of a current affairs program but the substance of a partially improvised drama. . And what was so striking about the Thursday night interview between Trump / Hannity at the US-Mexico border near McAllen, Texas, is how superficial the scenario and performance are.

Even faced with some of the most egregious softball issues of all time, Trump is barely consistent – unable to describe in detail what he wants, unable to cite any specific legal authority for a possible statement of offense. Emergency, and unable to describe what such an operation would actually allow it to achieve.

One of the subjects Trump has a real passion for is the treachery of the "fake diary" – a treachery he tells Hannity, which he learned from watching a previous episode of his show.

The man whose whims plunged the country into a massive crisis characterized by the fact that air traffic controllers work without pay, FBI agents fearing that ongoing investigations are being dropped, Joshua Tree National Park irreparably damaged and the food inspection interrupted does not seem to take place. idea why.

Trump can not explain exactly what he is proposing

A crucial question in any political negotiation is what both parties want. The point of view of the Democrats is quite clear: they want to reopen the government and then let the negotiations on any additional demand for building walls continue on another path. Trump, on the contrary, insists that the government must remain closed until it succeeds.

But what exactly does he want? Trump can not quite say. He seems to recognize that he will not build the 2,000-mile wall on which he has campaigned, claiming that if the border flap in front of the wall is walled up, Border Patrol personnel could be redeployed elsewhere. But how much wall are we talking about? And or? And at what price? Trump does not know

Sean: There is no barrier. All these drugs happen if these guys can not cover every inch, you know, of 3,000 kilometers.

Trump: That's right. They have easy access to the United States. We built a lot of wall. We have renovated a huge amount of wall with the money we already got. And we continue that. But now we really want to start it and finish it. We will build the new wall. And that's common sense. It's really when you think about it, whether you're in the world of law enforcement like those incredible people behind us who understand the wall so easily, I mean it would make their job much better. And they could also go to other areas, because where you have the wall, you do not need so many people. If you think about it, we would probably pay as many times in a year. Just a few times. So, it's not a matter of money. It's a political affair. They are watching the 2020 race and do not feel very good about it, they will do everything they can to win.

In fact, later in the interview, Trump seems to recognize that the presence or the absence of a physical barrier has very little to do with the main argument of the politics of the future. immigration presented in Washington.

"I do not know how you will recover from the loss of a child killed by illegal immigrants," observes Hannity, as if it was easy to be bounced back after the murder of his child by an American born in the country. "I met and interviewed so many fathers and mothers of angels."

Trump elaborates further on this theme, citing the White House's general argument that US law is too generous for asylum seekers .

Death flows. Not only at the border. They cross the border. They will filter in the country. You were MS-13 gangs in different places like Los Angeles and you have gangs all over Long Island that we're getting rid of. There should be no reason for us to have to do it. That, she should not be allowed. If we had the barrier, they would not be allowed to enter.

Trump's implication that Central American asylum seekers are all dangerous gang members is grotesque blood libel and it's sad for America. But for the purpose of closure, the key point is the one that Trump himself makes here: asylum seekers are allowed to enter because the asylum application is legal . The White House says it wants to comply with the laws in force. But with unauthorized immigration from Mexico that has dropped significantly from what it was 15 or 20 years ago – it's asylum seekers – not people sneaking up to the border is at the heart of the debate. The wall is out of place.

And yet, Trump is also willing to say that it is a kind of urgency.

Trump can not explain his emergency plan

While the partial closure whistled in his third week, there is a growing consensus in Washington that Trump will pull himself out of business to get rid of the power to build an emergency wall that turns it into a battle with the courts and allow Trump to reopen the government without seeming to back down.

But when Hannity offers this option, presumably for Trump to justify it, the president can not bother to explain the powers he speaks of asserting or why (perhaps he should read the explanator from Emily Stewart). Trump says he's "allowed to do it", ie declare an emergency, but he can not describe what the law allows him to do or what this statement would allow him to make. He's just starting to walk.

Hannity: You said earlier in the day that it was likely that you would declare a national emergency. How long would it happen?

Trump: If we do not reach an agreement with Congress, I will most likely do so. I would even say that I would do it. I can not imagine a reason why I do not have the right to do it. The law is 100% on my side. So if we can not reach an agreement with Congress, we should be able to do it with Congress. If you look, the congressional Democrats, especially the new ones who are coming in, are starting to say, wait a minute, we can not win this battle against Trump, because that's common sense. How can we say that a wall does not work? They show on helicopters empty fields and people crossing. And you put a wall, they can not cross.

Then, Hannity tries to help him with a specific idea – perhaps through an emergency declaration, could he use the money from the Department of Defense to build a wall. But Trump moves away immediately and starts talking about wheels.

Hannity: What are the possible options if you declare a national emergency, the Pentagon also has the necessary funds to enable it to support the construction of the wall.

Trump: If we do not reach an agreement with Congress, we should be able to do it. Really just common sense and a compromise is needed and, look, they know that the wall works. Do you know what works? A wheel. And a wall They call it a medieval thing. Well, you know, I look at all these expensive cars everywhere loaded with machine guns and each of them has wheels. A wheel is an old thing. There are two things that they work on. A wall would be so effective. That would solve so many murders and so many deaths, drugs and human trafficking. Where they stick women on their faces. They record them and place them in the back of a car or van and cross our border.

I'm not quite sure what Trump is talking about here, but more specifically. Trump is not sure what Hannity is talking about, so he started talking about it. And yet, Trump is the main decision maker in this crisis. Then he starts a pity party.

Trump is not aware of others

More than a million people live in households that depend on a federal salary that will not come tomorrow because of Donald Trump's legislative tactics. Children can not go to the zoo, pilots care about the safety of the air system, companies that rely on discounted economic data fly in the dark, services for Native Americans are about to be safe. collapse completely and the economic consequences will only sound mushroom if several popped pay checks lead to loan defaults and cascading problems.

Meanwhile, Trump missed his usual Christmas vacation in a luxury seaside resort:

Trump: They know what I say is 100% accurate. It's not just us, it's everybody saying that, everyone says it. If you do not have a solid or solid barrier, be it a steel fence or a concrete wall, you will never be able to solve this problem. You will never resolve and I do not need. This look, I could have done something much easier. I could have amused myself. I did not leave the White House because I'm waiting for them to come back in a long time. You know. I stayed at home for Christmas. I stayed at the White House for the New Year.

Hannity: I think you tweeted alone on Christmas Eve, where are Chuck and Nancy?

Trump: My family, I told them to stay in Florida and have fun. The point is, I want to be in Washington. I mean, I consider it very, very important.

But that's the crux of the matter. He does not consider that this question is very important. It is not important enough for him to offer the Democrats anything substantive in a legislative exchange, nor for him to have taken the trouble to learn about the issue or even to develop a specific proposal . He imposes huge costs on a large number of people, but he personally suffers only from the indignity of hanging out at the White House.

And he is so unconscious that he has thrown himself into a pity party amidst all the problems he poses. Here, we do not apologize for the inconvenience, followed by an explanation of why it does so. Because he's not sorry. He wants us to feel sorry for him. And, in some ways, it's the most disturbing thing of all.

[ad_2]
Source link