Trump tower talks in Moscow were "active" during the 2016 elections



[ad_1]

Breaking News E-mails

Receive last minute alerts and special reports. News and stories that matter, broadcast in the morning on weekdays.

By Ben Kamisar

WASHINGTON – The personal attorney of President Donald Trump, Rudy Giuliani, said Sunday that the construction projects of a Trump tower to Moscow remained an "active proposition" at a later date. November 2016, leaving open the possibility that the Trump family-run family business will continue the business deal until the presidential election, several months later than expected.

Appearing on "Meet the Press" on NBC, Giuliani said the president had declared him, he can "remember having had conversations" with his former lawyer, Michael Cohen, about the project up to In 2016. Cohen pleaded guilty to having lied to Congress about the timing of his involvement in this proposal, admitting that he had worked there until June after initially declaring that it had ended early in the year 2016, [20169007] "We understand that they have continued throughout 2016," Giuliani said about the discussions, adding that they "n & nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp; Were not many, but there were conversations.I can not be sure of the exact date. "

" This could probably go up to October, November – our responses cover up to the end. at election time ", he said, referring to written questions from Trump and his lawyers ats. the office of lawyer Robert Mueller. "So they could have talked about it at any time during this period, but the President remembers it, it's a little tarnished."

"I would say Michael Cohen would remember much better than the president, "added Giuliani. "It was much more important to him – it was his only mission.The president was a candidate for the presidency of the United States." So you have to expect that it will not be there. do not have a lot of focus on a project that will never go anywhere. "

Senator Mark Warner, D-Va., Also stated that the idea that negotiations could have continued until November was "great news".

"It's a news for me, and it's a big news. Why, two years after the fact, are we learning this fact now that there have been so many investigations? ", Is interviewed Warner, the largest Democrat of the Senate Intelligence Committee.

" I think most voters – Democrats, Republicans, Independents, you name him, knowing that the Republican candidate was trying to actively to do business in Moscow, which the Republican candidate had offered at least at one point, he had built this building, Vladimir Putin, a penthouse free, and if Negotiations were going on until 39, In elections, I think voters need to know, Warner said. And I find it remarkable to note that we are two years after the fact and that we discover it today. "

The project of the Moscow Tower is part of separate investigations conducted by the special council and the legislator on the links between the Trump campaign and Russia's interference in the election of 2016.

Cohen said that he had lied about the length of his involvement in the process so as to be consistent with Trump's public statements that he was not involved in commercial relations with

Questions about Cohen's motives were also included in a controversial story published by BuzzFeed that Trump personally ordered Cohen to lie to Congress.

This accusation prompted Democrats to ring alarms immediately. , some calling for impeachment proceedings.

But a day after the publication of the article, the spokesman for the special council Peter Carr said in a statement "The description by BuzzFeed of specific statements to the special advocate The description of the documents and evidence obtained by this office regarding the testimony of Michael Cohen in Congress is not accurate. "BuzzFeed stated that he was sticking to history."

On Sunday, Giuliani stated that he was "100% sure" that Trump would never have asked Cohen to lie to Congress.

"The Department of Justice and the special council office said that the story was inaccurate." And the inaccuracy is that there is no evidence that the president told him to lie, "he added.

[ad_2]
Source link