[ad_1]
This decision would greatly increase Stone's legal stakes, which was faced with a close examination of the investigation by a special council, and suggest an increased interest of federal prosecutors for one of the closest allies of President Donald Trump. He would also return before the Democrats took power in January, with the new chairman of the committee, Republican Adam Schiff of California, promising to provide Mueller with all the transcripts of the testimony of the witnesses who testified before the committee as part of the Investigation of Russia.
Members, as well as Democrats, told CNN that they would be willing to vote on Thursday to provide Stone's transcript to Mueller
Mueller's request is the first time that the special council has formally requested documents to the According to the Post, citing people who were familiar with this request, the committee also referred to the investigation of the interference of Russia in the election of 2016.
The office of the special council has focused on the stone, which investigates the interference of Russia in the & 9 [[[[[[[[[[[[[2016presidentialelectionelectionandifanyoftheTrumpcampaignwasinvolvedMuellerexaminedStone'spotentialreturnchannelstoWikiLeaksandhiscommunicationwithTrumpthenacandidateduringthecampaignaspartofhisinvestigation
Rep. Mike Conaway, the Texas Republican who led the investigation on Russia, told CNN that he would vote Thursday for publication of the transcript if Mueller officially asked him.
Conaway said the Republicans had voted against Schiff's previous motion to turn over to Mueller all the transcripts of witnesses, considered a "waterfall" and Mueller had not asked for them. The Republican said the publication of transcripts without an official request would run counter to the committee's precedents.
"If Mueller had asked, we would have sent him," said Conaway, adding that he did not know if the request had been made.
Stone told the post Wednesday that he had not been informed of Mueller's request. . According to the Post, Stone stated that he was confident that his testimony would provide no reason for Mueller to charge him.
"I do not think that a reasonable attorney who would consider it would conclude that I have committed perjury, which requires material intent and materiality," Stone said in the mail.
But Democrats Say Stone Could Be Legally Threatened
Democrat Representative Jim Himes, Member of House Intelligence Committee, told CNN's Wolf Blitzer about "The Crisis Room" Personally, after listening to Roger Stone's testimony, I certainly wonder if he was truthful. "
" The more we learn, the more we – we, at least, we worry that he does not not honest with the committee, "Himes told Blitzer.
"There is evidence that Roger Stone lied in Congress and that in recent weeks he has been laying charges against the people for lying to Congress, which gives him a real influence on Roger Stone, "Himes said of the special advocate.
Stone Revea Last month, he was in communication with at least one senior Trump campaigner, Steve Bannon, about the upcoming revelations of WikiLeaks during the 2016 presidential race.
L & # Trump's long-time ally also released text messages showing him that he had exchanged messages with his alleged WikiLeaks. Back on the impending "big news" detrimental to Hillary Clinton's election campaign before WikiLeaks releases pirated emails from former Clinton campaign president John Podesta.
CNN's Sara Murray and Kara Scannell contributed to this report.
[ad_2]Source link
