We already know how this judgment will end



[ad_1]

Someone has to blink or both sides make compromises. But it's rarely a compromise that ends a judgment.

At the root of each of the recent government rulings – in the 1990s, 2013, and last year – was a disagreement over policy between the legislator and the president, in which one or both parties did not want to bend and were willing to hold the government's funds hostage.

In this case, it is the wall-border promised long ago by President Donald Trump, that the Democrats do not want to build or pay. At the moment, it is pretty clear that Mexico will not do it. Do not forget that Trump could not get funding for the wall when Republicans controlled the House, but last year he had declared that he would not sign new bills expenditure without wall funding.

(Note: If Trump and House President Nancy Pelosi wants her stalemate on the wall of the border to be equivalent to the longest closure in history, it will be necessary to wait until January 14 for someone A blink of the eye, or January 21, if you associate the successive closures of 1995 and 1996. A good bet at this time.)

While she was preparing to take the torch President and give the Democrats a hold on the federal government, Pelosi told NBC that there would be nothing for a wall.

"We can go back and forth," Pelosi said. "No. How many times can we say no, nothing for the wall."

During a televised monilot of a Wednesday Cabinet meeting, Trump repeatedly spoke of the need for a wall and said he was ready to maintain closure. "As long as it takes" to get the $ 5.6 billion that he wants for a border wall.

"We are deadlocked because the Democrats are refusing to finance border security," he said. "They try to make it as if it's just because of the wall, and that's about it."

So, there will or will not be funding, probably masked by some sort of strategy that will save face, but until we know the answer to this question, the parts of the federal government that are closed will remain like this.

This is the end of these other notable recent closures.

Closures of Clinton and Gingrich – November 1995 and December 1995 to January 1996

Who blinked [19659002] Bill Clinton, then the Republicans of Congress [19659002] These two closures combined for 28 days. They are now seen as largely helping to revive the Clinton presidency, even though he has accepted, with stipulations, Republican demands for the budget to be balanced within seven years.

Clinton made this concession to end the first closure. Republicans blinked their demands on how to implement it with the second.

The Day of the Longest US Closure – January 6, 1996 – The New York Times used the language of retirement to refer to Republicans on its front.

"But in the end, the ruling had completely turned the force into a powerful force against Republicans, who were seen as devastating federal workers and innocent citizens to score political points." Points, "Michael Wines wrote on the front page of the Times. "And Mr. Clinton's stubborn refusal to reach an agreement, considered last year as evidence of political weakness, suddenly began to look like courage against an enemy siege."

The Closure of Obamacare – October 2013

Who blinked?

Congressional Republicans

Conservative Republicans like Texas Sen. Ted Cruz and Mark Meadows Representative of North Carolina contributed to the conduct of an insurgency among Republicans in the House, where they insisted on removing funding from the Affordable Care Act. But with President Barack Obama still in power and Democrats under Senate control at the time, this effort had no chance of success. Other issues were at stake, but the Republicans finally agreed to fund the government at current levels by slightly amending the revenue verification for health care grants.

Speaker of the House of Representatives John Boehner admitted in an interview on the radio that the Republicans had abandoned the task.

"We had a good fight and we just did not win," he said at the time.

The judgment of the DACA – January 2018

Who

Democrats in the Senate

The Democrats thought that they had high morals even though they did not have a majority in the House or the Senate. Thus, the leader of the Senate minority, Chuck Schumer, refused to vote a bill on massive spending unless Mr. Trump and the Republicans agree to a permanent solution for undocumented immigrants brought to the United States. United in their childhood. They had been protected by the deferred action program for child arrivals, promulgated by the fiat under Obama, but ended by Trump. The Democrats quickly lost their temper and accepted the promise of Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell that the Senate consider a permanent solution to DACA. Senators failed to repair DACA. And Trump's decision to end DACA has been slowed down by the courts. This question should come back this year.

The details of the date and the end of the current closure remain to be determined because it ends with its 13th day, but what will happen in the end, it is a part that will have to give. [19659029] [ad_2]
Source link