[ad_1]
MP Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Senator Ed Markey, along with dozens of co-sponsors, presented a vision of the Green New Deal. A Republican called this a "socialist manifesto". Many environmental groups have praised him, but some say it does not go far enough. Others warn that its broad reach and the long list of progressive social programs that she approves could hamper her climate efforts.
So, what is the Green New Deal?
The proposal defines the main principles of a plan aimed at simultaneously combating inequalities and combating climate change. It does not contain details on policies and does not advocate specific ways to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. But with a broad scope, it aims to make the United States carbon neutral – zero net carbon emissions – in 10 years
The Green New Deal recognizes that the transition would require significant changes. It approves ways to ensure that vulnerable populations – including the poor, people of color, indigenous peoples and communities already experiencing environmental degradation – participate in the planning process and benefit from the Green economy.
Would this end the use of coal, oil and natural gas?
No. But it would be an example of offsetting greenhouse gas pollution by forests that absorb carbon dioxide. It does not specifically address the role that nuclear energy or fossil fuels associated with carbon capture technologies could play. Nuclear energy accounts for half of the carbon – free energy in the United States, but it uses uranium extract. Fossil fuels trapped in carbon would still require drilling and pollute the site.
Is the Green New Deal ambitious?
Incredibly ambitious, both in terms of climate change and its reimagination of society. the US economy. On the whole greenhouse gas emissions in the United States in 2016, 28% came from electricity, 28% from transportation, 22% from industry, 11% from commercial sectors and residential and 9% of agriculture.
Up to now, we have focused on the electricity sector, which is probably the easiest to decarbonize. Many states and localities continued this work even though the federal government was unaware of climate change.
But coal is being replaced by renewable energy and natural gas. Natural gas has a smaller carbon footprint than coal, but still causes climate change.
In addition, climate advocates and policy experts in the country have generally not attempted to address all the factors that contribute to global warming and other societal problems. This type of thinking and planning at the system level would be difficult to adopt.
The transfer of energy would require a major investment, as well as the social programs highlighted in the Green New Deal. The resolution does not suggest a source for this money. The plan's policy is also difficult, with Republicans controlling the Senate and the White House vehemently opposing it and divided Democrats on whether this approach is the right one.
How would he fight against climate change? [19659003] The objectives of the document include a "10-year national mobilization" aimed at:
-
building resilience to climate change-related disasters
-
improving infrastructure
-
to meet the demand for energy efficiency. electricity with "clean, renewable and zero-emission energy" sources "
-
develop energy efficiency and access to electricity
-
collaborate with farmers to reduce emissions
-
reorganize the transportation sector with electric vehicles, public transit and high-speed rail
-
to eliminate greenhouse gases from the atmosphere by strengthening forests
What does science recommend?
building resilience to climate change-related disasters
improving infrastructure
to meet the demand for energy efficiency. electricity with "clean, renewable and zero-emission energy" sources "
develop energy efficiency and access to electricity
collaborate with farmers to reduce emissions
reorganize the transportation sector with electric vehicles, public transit and high-speed rail
to eliminate greenhouse gases from the atmosphere by strengthening forests
The planet has been warming to about 1 ° C (1.8 ° F) since industrialization. Scientists say that to limit warming to 1.5 ° C, it would be necessary to reduce human carbon emissions by 45% by 2030 and reach a net zero by 2050. The United States currently generate about 15% of this greenhouse gas pollution, although it is the largest historical contributor.
A warming of more than 1.5 ° C worsens the risk of drought, floods, extreme heat and poverty for hundreds of millions of people.
What would the Green New Deal do for people?
The proposal proposes many "crises", including the decline in life expectancy for many Americans, as well as stagnant wages and income inequality.
The Green New Deal calls for:
-
Guaranteed employment with just pay, family leave and medical leave, paid leave and retirement security
-
universal high quality health care
-
free and higher education [19659015] access to affordable, safe and adequate housing
-
strengthening of working conditions, health and safety at work, fight against discrimination, and retention of hours and wages
-
clearance of hazardous waste landfill [19659015] access to water and clean air, affordable health and food, and nature
Source link