[ad_1]
The tripartite negotiations between Naftogaz, Gazprom and the European Commission should lead to the conclusion of long-term agreements on a certain volume of gas transiting through Ukraine and bound for Europe. In the best case, the medium term is 3 to 5 years to preserve the Ukrainian GTS
Political expert Andrei Vigirinsky expressed this opinion on Channel 24.
Read also: New gas agreements with the Russia: how not to fall back into the trap of the Kremlin? 19659004] According to the expert, the problem is that Ukraine wants Russia to offer a long-term competitive price for the transit of gas in Europe. Naftogaz even wrote a tariff schedule according to which the transit price is higher than that indicated in the agreements signed in 2009. But Gazprom did not recognize it, referring to the same gas contracts. Naftogaz promises to sue Gazprom for $ 12 billion, but this part of the claim has already been rejected by Stockholm.
It is extremely important for Ukraine to pump into the GTS a certain amount of gas per year – at least 30 billion cubic meters. At the same time, the construction project of the pipeline "North Stream 2" can leave our pipe at all without gas. Ukraine fears that gas will be consumed all year round. And peak consumption in Europe – in winter. And
Read also: The European Commission has proposed to Ukraine a long-term gas transit contract
According to him, Ukraine can not engage in direct talks with Russia and proposes tripartite talks. with the European Commission and Gazprom. But it is obvious that the SMT can simply stay in the ground.
Gazprom does not want a long-term transit contract. They say: Poland, Slovakia, Hungary will ask for a certain amount of gas, Russia will transport this volume in a short time. A contract of indefinite duration is not necessary. Market rules. Ukraine can refuse. But then Europe will be offended. And what to do with the hose? In Russia, nobody will pump gasoline. No alternative sources. The losses will rise to $ 3 billion a year
notes Vigirinsky.
On the other hand, Andrei Vigirinsky points out that Gazprom has enough time to find other ways to deliver gas to Europe.
According to the results of the trilateral meeting on gas issues, with the participation of representatives of Ukraine, Russia and the European Union, it was announced that Gazprom was proposing to extend existing contracts with the Naftogaz of Ukraine, even without having mandate. no advice. In addition, Ukraine has received from the European Commission a proposal on the volumes and conditions of a gas transit contract after 2019: a debate on this issue is expected to take place soon. At the same time, according to Ukrainian Foreign Minister Pavlo Klimkin, Russia is delaying negotiations.
What do we know about the complicated relations that Naftogaz has with Gazprom? On February 28, 2018, Stockholm arbitration ordered Russia, Gazprom, to pay a NJSC surcharge "Naftogaz of Ukraine" for the shortage of gas volumes agreed for transit. On March 2, Gazprom announced the termination of its contracts with the Ukrainian Naftogaz. On March 5, the head of the Russian company, Alexey Miller, said that Gazprom had sent an official announcement to Naftogaz on the termination of gas supply and transit contracts via Stockholm arbitration. Gazprom's current debt vis-à-vis Naftogaz comprises two parts: it is of $ 2.56 billion under the Stockholm arbitration decision on the purchase and the sale and of the transit agreement and of more than 6 billion the decision of the Ukrainian courts concerning antitrust claims . In the recalculation of the hryvnia, the amount is greater than 220 billion
. The Ministry of Justice stated that he had already made the first recovery. They started with Ukrainian assets. Total of these assets was found to 100 million hryvnia. This represents less than 1% of the declared AMF debt of 172 billion. At the Ministry of Justice, they say that it is not the end and continue to seek Russian money in domestic affairs.
By arbitration decision in Stockholm up to $ 2.5 billion of Gazprom's debt, it will not be possible to postpone it. After all, in 2009, when the Russians signed a contract with Ukraine, the Stockholm court was appointed as the main arbiter of disputes and disputes. The decision in this case came into force on February 28, 2018.
Until then, Gazprom had not paid a single penny to Ukraine. And the day of late payment costs half a million dollars in penalties.
Source link
