[ad_1]
There is no other person to blame than President Trump in case of partial closure of the government later this week.
The President stated that he would accept recriminations in case of closure. The question now is whether Trump will sign an expenditure bill that does not fund his wall.
"Many of us are trying to help him," lamented Senate Supply Committee Chairman Richard Shelby, R-Ala. about the effort to secure dollars for the border wall. "It did not work."
Thus, in the days to come, the House and the Senate will probably approve some form of short-term spending measure to avoid a partial government shutdown on Saturday morning. If nothing is done, then nine federal departments would close a few days before Christmas. Instead, a temporary set of interim solutions simply restores the remaining seven spending bills at current levels until February 8.
"If we go in February, what will happen next?" Shelby asked, not so rhetorical.
Not many changes. Except that Democrats will control the House next year.
The Senate Majority Leader, Mitch McConnell, seemed very confused by the reasons why House Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., Would like to struggle with the government's funding problems when she finishes her studies. studies. following the president in January
"I think the new President Pelosi has little leeway to reach an agreement," McConnell said. "I suppose his preference would be to deploy the new democratic agenda with the new Democratic Congress."
"I think the new President Pelosi has little leeway to reach an agreement. I suppose his preference would be to deploy the new democratic agenda with the new and new Democratic Congress. "
McConnell added that he thought banging in February The least desirable outcome from the president's perspective." [19659003] On the contrary.
To quote McConnell, it is the "new democratic agenda with the new Democratic Congress".
The Democrats overthrew the House of Negotiations. part because Trump has proved to be virulent in key districts. Pelosi is more than happy to confuse the president on a matter such as the border wall. The wall could energize the main supporters of Trump and delight the Red States. But the wall is totally toxic in poor neighborhoods and suburbs.
This scenario helps Pelosi on two fronts. He presents the California Democrat with a point of support to use against the president and simultaneously on behalf of the Liberal Democrats in his caucus.
In addition, a long battle on the wall would potentially help Pelosi temperate the story his team will do: investigate Trump.
True, a Democratic House will conduct numerous investigations on the Trump administration. But there are only a few cubic centimeters of oxygen available for the news.
A February fight against the wall means that media outlets will need to spend some time fighting between walls and not just focusing on alleged misdeeds of the president.
Is there a question that has prevailed here? If it was a boxing match, you could hear the bell ring at the ring's edge. Ding-Ding-Ding. The first round is over. The judges would award a unanimous decision to Pelosi.
The question is whether Trump will sign a bill – without a wall – to avoid a government shutdown this weekend?
Trump was unpredictable on this issue before. In March, members of the presidential administration negotiated a comprehensive spending program aimed at preventing the closure of the government. The budget director and Acting White House chief of staff, Mick Mulvaney, explained the merits of the agreement. The House and the Senate approved the plan.
But just hours before the deadline, the president almost triggered a government shutdown when he threatened to veto the measure. He finally signed the agreement.
Trump had to face a revolt from his base when details were leaked about the magnitude and scope of the omnibus spending stream. One may wonder if the President can deny anything that Congress approves, especially if his supporters threaten to mutiny.
This is the epitome of the problem posed by the meeting of the oval bureau that Trump organized last week with the leader of the senatorial minority, Chos Schumer, DN. Trump threatened to close and assume his responsibilities. Bravado has reinvigorated the loyalists of the president.
White House spokeswoman Sarah Sanders repeatedly said on Tuesday that the administration could still build the wall – even without congressional appropriation.
"There are certainly a number of different sources of funding, we have identified that we can use the money that would be given to us in the form of Congressional appropriations to enable us to reach that $ 5 billion," he said. Sanders.
"There are certainly a number of different sources of funding that we found that we could use the money that would be given to us through congressional appropriations allowing us to achieve those 5 billions of dollars. "
Such a maneuver is called" reprogramming "in Congress:" Take money The Congress has already been passed and "reprogram "for a purpose other than that originally intended. Trump promulgated the law on credits for military construction / VA. The Army Corps of Engineers budget comes under the "MilCon / VA" bill. It is possible that the Trump administration is requesting a "reprogramming" of the Army Corps of Engineers money for the wall. But this maneuver requires the approval of key members of the House and Senate appropriation committees.
"They must have the blessing of Congress for most reprogramming," said Pelosi
That said, an administration can transfer some money for purposes not approved by Congress. But we are only talking about a few million dollars here. A million dollars with a "Mr." Pocket in Washington.
The Trump administration says it is looking for possible ways to bypass Congress. This is a problem because article I, section 9, of the Constitution grants Congress the power of the stock exchange.
"They should read the Constitution," said one familiar with the congressional vote approval process. Another source said "This would create a storm storm" if the White House tried to bypass Capitol Hill.
Do Congressional Republicans Not Get Support from the President? As Shelby said, they tried to help. But the political street could not meet Trump's demand. Do not forget that many European citizens fear that voters will blame them for a closure. So they were ready to cash them.
A scenario like this seems to unfold in the same way every Christmas in Washington. There is a crisis of the day. The sides seem resolved in their resolution. And then, almost at the last minute, someone does not loop long before Santa Claus slips into the fireplace.
In truth, the outcome of this impasse was probably determined by the most influential people in Washington. Not lawmakers, but spouses of lawmakers and their families. After all, they want everyone to come home for Christmas.
Source link
