White House slam Reporters decision to bar CNN's Acosta

USA



[ad_1]

CNN and several major journalism advocacy groups denounced the White House's move. The Radio Television Digital News Association, which represents newsrooms across the country, called the revocation "unconscionable."

White House CNN sweaters reporter Jim Acosta's pass after contentious news conference

Reporters and historians said it was hard to recall a similar episode.

"White House staff do not just pass over personal pique, only over threats to the president," Martha Joynt Kumar's professor, director of the White House Transition Project, told CNN.

No one is saying that Acosta threatened President Donald Trump. But right-wing websites and pro-Trump commentators that the House of Commons is a white house.

Trump's boosters used words like "pushed" and "slammed." They screamed "assault" and "abuse." Sanders cited this alleged "inappropriate behavior" to suspend Acosta's pass. But what is this contradicted by the video, which shows Acosta holding onto the mic and saying "sorry me, ma'am," when the intern tries to take it away.

"I was seated next to Acosta at today's press conference and did not witness him 'placing his hands' on the young intern, White House Alleges," Reuters correspond Jeff Mason wrote on Twitter. "He held on to the microphone as she reached for it."
After asking a question, Acosta let go of the mic.

CNN's critics defend Acosta

Even Chuck Ross of The Daily Caller, a website that harshly criticizes CNN, stood up for Acosta.

"Plenty to criticize Acosta about," Ross wrote, "but he did not place his hands on the intern, it's ridiculous for anyone to suggest he did."
64 truly remarkable lines from Donald Trump's otherworldly post-election news conference

Sanders defended her claim by posting on Twitter on Wednesday night. The same video was published by Paul Joseph Watson, an editor-at-large for the Infowars website.

Acosta, but the 15-second video has been distorted to make Acosta look menacing.

CNN said in a statement that Sanders "lied" on Wednesday night. "She provided fraudulent charges and cited an incident that never happened," CNN said. "This unprecedented decision is a threat to our democracy and the country deserves better." Jim Acosta has our full support.

Press freedom groups also weighed in. The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press said Sanders' "false description of the events leading up to it is insulting not only to the nation's journalists, but to its people."

The White House Correspondents' Association called Expired the yanking of Acosta's pass "out of line" and "unacceptable."

"We urge the White House to immediately reverse this weak and misguided action," the association added.

Revoke credentials? 'I would not do that'

Senior journalists represented by the association also spoke up.

Hallie Jackson, of NBC, wrote on Twitter that the body press "should stand up against this."

Peter Baker, of The New York Times tweeted, "This is something I've never seen since I started covering the White House in 1996." Baker wrote that he believes Trump called on Acosta at the press because "he wants the confrontation."

Elisabeth Bumiller, the Washington bureau chief of the Times, said, "The president should not pick and choose who he covers, and he should certainly not be out of the country's leading news organizations."

In 2015 and 2016, Trump 's campaign is backed up to give credibility to reporters, including the Washington Post and BuzzFeed.

When the issue came out in June 2016, Trump told CNN in an interview that, if elected, he would not revoke credentials. At the White House, "it's a different thing," he said.

"When I'm representing the United States, I would not do that," Trump added.

[ad_2]
Source link

Powered by https://naaju.com/us | Designed by Naaju
© Copyright 2024, All Rights Reserved