[ad_1]
The Ohio House of Representatives has passed what is widely considered one of the most restrictive abortion bills in the country: banning abortion from the first beat detectable fetal heart, which may occur during the first six weeks of pregnancy.
The proposal, which was passed by 58 to 35 in the Republican-controlled House, must now be sent back to the Senate.
The very strict draft law has been the subject of much criticism from proponents of choice, especially since it allows exceptions only in cases where a pregnancy could endanger the life of the child. the woman who is causing or causing substantial bodily harm.
However, it does not provide exceptions for cases of rape, incest or other health risks.
Democratic Representative Kristin Boggs of Ohio's 18th District reprimanded the bill, saying that "motherhood should never be imposed on anyone".
"Becoming a mother, and especially a daughter's mother, has only strengthened my determination on the importance of allowing women to be able to control their motherhood," Boggs said, according to WTHR.
His Democratic colleague, Nickie Antonio, representative of the 13th district of Ohio, pointed out that "it is common for a woman to not even know that she is pregnant before six weeks" , according to the newspaper. The dispatch of Columbus.
"This is especially true for women emotionally traumatized by rape," Antonio said.
Republican Representative Candice Keller of Ohio's 53rd district, who supported the bill, called the abortion "an assault on the family".
"It's an assault on Ohio because it destroys the minds and hearts of women all over the world," she said, according to WTHR.
This is not the first time the restrictive bill has been passed in the House.
It was also passed in 2016, but Governor John Kasich, who ruled it unconstitutional, vetoed it.
This time, Republican lawmakers have enough members in both chambers to overturn a veto from Kasich – and Republican state representative Christina Hagan said the supporters of the bill were ready for a court challenge, according to the broadcaster.
She also suggested that, as Brett Kavanaugh, who had just been appointed to the Supreme Court, had just been appointed to the Supreme Court, she thinks abortion bans such as that of the Ohio are likely to be implemented.
"I campaigned on behalf of President Trump and part of that reason was to make sure that we had a Supreme Court that respects the constitution when appointments become available," Hagan said. the broadcaster.
"This is now the case and we have more favors and opportunities than ever before for this extension of protection to be granted to children in the womb," she said.
Yes Roe v. Wade, The 1973 Supreme Court's landmark decision recognizing the woman's legal right to abortion is overturned, with many reproductive rights advocates fearing that it will be with Kavanaugh's appointment, then Hagan could be right.
Read more: Electors in Alabama and West Virginia Approve Anti-Abortion Amendments in Hope Roe v. Wade will be reversed
At the moment, measures to ban abortion completely can not have any real impact, but if the Supreme Court decided to overturn Roe v. Wade or give states the power to decide on their own abortion laws, access to abortions could then be limited in states that have voted for anti-abortion measures.
In the recent mid-term elections, voters in Alabama and West Virginia approved changes to their state's constitution that could also threaten access to abortion if Roe v. Wade is reversed.
The new amendment of Alabama, amendment 2, removes constitutional protections from the right to abortion, while the new amendment of West Virginia, amendment 1, amends the state constitution to clarify that the right to abortion will not be protected, in addition to preventing the state taxpayers' money from being used to abortions for those who rely on Medicaid.
[ad_2]
Source link
