Chinese scientist explains that he made gene-modified twins using CRISPR technology



[ad_1]

Breaking News Emails

Receive last minute alerts and special reports. News and stories that matter, delivered the mornings of the week.

/ Source: Associated press

By Marilynn Marchione, Associated Press

HONG KONG – A Chinese researcher claims to have helped create the world's first genetically modified baby – twin babies born this month, whose DNA he modified with a powerful new tool that can rewrite the model of life.

If this is true, it would be a giant leap forward in science and ethics.

An American scientist said that he had taken part in the work in China, but this type of genetic modification is banned in the United States because DNA changes can be passed on to future generations and could harm other genes.

Many mainstream scientists think it is too dangerous to try, and some have called the Chinese report human experimentation.

Embryo
An embryo received a small dose of Cas9 protein and PCSK9 sgRNA in a sperm injection microscope at a laboratory in Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, southern China, on October 9, 2018.Mark Schiefelbein / AP

The researcher, He Jiankui of Shenzhen, said he has modified embryos for seven couples during fertility treatments, with a pregnancy up to now. He stated that his goal was not to cure or prevent an inherited disease, but to try to confer a trait that few people naturally have: the ability to withstand a possible future HIV infection , the AIDS virus.

He added that the parents concerned did not want to be identified or interviewed and that he would not tell them where they lived or where the work was done.

There is no independent confirmation of his request, and it has not been published in a journal where it would be verified by other experts. He revealed it Monday in Hong Kong at one of the organizers of an international conference on gene editing that should open Tuesday, and earlier in exclusive interviews with The Associated Press.

"I feel a strong responsibility that it's not enough to make a first, but also to make an example," he told the AP. "Society will decide what to do next" to allow or prohibit such science.

[ad_2]
Source link