[ad_1]
Black energy – the hypothetical pressure exerted by scientists constitutes the bulk of the universe and fuels its growth – could possibly no longer exist. Professor Subir Sarkar, a particle physicist from the College of Oxford, said that when we provide more evidence referring to the universe and its growth, the arguments for dark energy are: ; weaken. in the 90s after scientists saw mild supernovae that are getting weaker than expected. Astronomers Saul Perlmutter, Brian Schmidt and Adam Riess concluded that the universe is rising and that dark energy is becoming its friend. In 2011, they received the Nobel Prize in Physics for their work: "I am skeptical from the start," said Sarkar in an interview with Horizon magazine of the European Union. "I did not feel that astronomers were taking the elephantine out of the systematic uncertainties of their information." In 2014, this information became public. The following year, Sarkar and his colleagues began an independent diagnosis of the results. Their results showed that evidence of a dark energy had a statistical significance of three standard deviations – or three sigmas. The higher the sigma, the more difficult or likely the result. "It's more realistic not to be too angry, except that you've only dropped a five-sigma result, no doubt when it comes to traditional physics," said Sarkar. A huge energy discipline of resplendent blue lightning at home. Dark energy may possibly no longer exist, says the physicist. iStock Ideal month, Sarkar has submitted a newsletter request to refute the existence of a dark energy and, by way of change, the observed growth is the end result of the 'drift en masse' in the world. local universe. This, he explains, explains why growth charges seem to vary across the universe. Moderately about shredded measures to enhance dark energy were taken from supernovae in the little similar little of the universe. As you see the air begin here, the statistical significance decreases. "Right, they're not accelerating anymore, probably because you're decelerating. The fact is, we are no longer timely observers. We explore the complete photography of the week in these slideshows. Most scientists working in the discipline are resting peacefully on the fact that this dark energy is in the friendship of the growth of the universe and Sarkar is aware that it can be complicated to alternate the search for consensus. However, life-saving experiences may be content to think of one of his peers in the years to come: "The Archaic Greeks are identical in the model of the universe of Aristotle, in which the Sun and planets revolve around the Earth. We prefer, however, to start with various probabilities. Let's hope it does not fly as long to change our standard model as with Aristotle – 2000 years.
Read more
Source link
