[ad_1]
The New York Times on Wednesday published an online editorial written by a Trump contributor that says several senior administration officials are trying to "thwart" parts of the president's agenda and "the worst inclinations."
"I would know. I am one of them, "wrote the official in the room, which was making waves all over the country after its publication.
The official wrote that although the group of officials wants "the administration to succeed," they believe that "our first duty is in this country and the president continues to act in a way that harms to the health of our republic ".
"The root of the problem is the amorality of the president," wrote the official.
The author accused the president of rejecting the long-held ideals of Republicans, arguing that recent conservative politics such as tax reform "do not have – and not because – the president's leadership style." adversary, mean and inefficient. ")
"Americans should know that there are adults in the room," the newspaper said. "We fully recognize what is happening. And we are trying to do what is right, even when Donald Trump will not do it.
The play was published while the Trump administration deals with the fallout of "Fear," a book written by Bob Woodward that describes a dysfunctional White House. In the book, Woodward quotes senior officials, including John Kelly and Jim Mattis, according to which Trump was a "fool", and had the intelligence of a fifth- or sixth-grade student. Trump rejected the book as a "fictional work. "
In the Times editorial, the author stated that, throughout the Trump administration, "senior officials will privately admit their daily disbelief" in the President's comments and actions.
The author also praised the "unsung heroes" at the White House: "Some of his collaborators have been considered bad guys by the media. But privately, they have gone to great lengths to keep the wrong decisions on the West Wing, even if they are not always successful. "
The identity of the writer was not immediately clear. A note from the editors at the head of the editorial indicated that the identity of the official "is known to us" and that the article was published "at the request of the author".
"We believe that the anonymous publication of this essay is the only way to provide an important perspective to our readers," the editors wrote, adding that the publication of such an anonymous piece was a "rare step" for the newspaper.
Several people looked at the play online, with some reacting to the play – many people who reacted began to think of "Wow" – to those who were trying to guess the identity of the author.
Source link
