[ad_1]
WASHINGTON – Less than 24 hours after returning members of the August Holiday House, Republicans are already ready to accept defeat to fund a border wall – and the Democrats seem just as ready to respond by letting it go. ; yes.
With the government's funding deadline approaching September 30, legislators plan to send several packages of invoices to the president for his signature this month. Whatever organizations Congress can not fund through these so-called "minibuses," Republicans and Democrats plan to continue turning to their former legislative friend, the permanent resolution.
On Wednesday morning, House GOP leaders told members that the goal was to "do no drama" before the mid-term elections.
President Donald Trump acknowledged Wednesday morning that he saw "no one nor anyone else close the country yet." House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.), Said he was not to convince Trump to risk a government shutdown. Freedom Caucus Chair Mark Meadows (RN.C.), told HuffPost that, although he is ready to fight for a wall now, he thinks Republicans will have a better chance of winning in January .
"Do not fight for the wall becomes a tactical issue more than folding," Meadows said. "You know when is the best time to take this fight?"
Meadows and other Conservatives may think they have a better chance of winning after the election, but even Meadows admitted that signing more no-funds bills would "win next time" .
Independently, with the President, the GOP leaders and the Freedom Caucus mainly on the same page, the Congress should be able to take some credit measures for a full year of funding and continue to operate the other agencies. to emit in the next year, but more likely in the December lame session.
This does not mean that all Republicans will vote for these bills on minibuses or for a continuous resolution. Representative Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) Said on Wednesday that such a strategy was probably an indication that Democrats would gain on spending and that conservatives like him would be free to vote no. And any compromise is inconstant. Trump usually contradicts himself a few times on the question of whether Republicans should close the government on wall funding.
But with all this leverage, how much do Democrats really earn on these credit bills?
The Democrats were quiet about Wednesday's talks, but members of the Parliamentary Appropriations Committee rejected the idea that they would not have enough in exchange for their votes.
"Who said we did not play hardball?" Rep. Jose Serrano (D-N.Y.) Asked HuffPost. "Did you attend one of these meetings?
When HuffPost asked questions about democratic credits in supply bills – the political prescriptions that legislators slip into spending legislation – Serrano suggested that a more important role of Democrats was to block the GOP runners.
Another high-ranking Democrat of the Credit Committee, representative Rosa DeLauro (Conn.), Acknowledged that Democrats did not yield to Republicans.
"We are going back and forth, but we are not going to give up something that is important to us," she said. "Democrats are really fighting hard."
Some Democrats worry that they could overplay their bills and ask Republicans to withdraw from negotiations and simply propose a short-term extension of funding that would be difficult for Democrats. Instead, the Democrats are banking on the idea that they can now get major concessions on congressional agency funds and fight again in other parts of the government – how far the Republicans would have less power . government, which would almost certainly include the Department of Homeland Security.
In this sense, the Democrats are fine with the GOP's "no drama" plan. But they could also lose a moment in which they have a huge leverage before maturities.
Still is, with Trump dominating the news cycle every day with unbalanced tweets – like the Monday post where he basically advocated political corruption – Democrats may think that it is better to get out of the way of the president and let the voters just see him.
True to form, late Wednesday, Trump had already turned on his desire to prevent a closure.
"If it happens, it happens" Trump said. "If it's about border security, I'm ready to do anything."
[ad_2]
Source link
