[ad_1]
Following AEG's claim of "victory" in the wars of the place, Osbourne replies "in my world … we won the lawsuit".
Sharon Osbourne falls on the owner of AEG Phil Anschutz, after the billionaire tried to declare himself the winner of the ongoing battles – a victory that Osbourne claims he did not win.
On Saturday, September 30, Osbourne's lawyer and her husband, Ozzy Osbourne, filed documents to end their lawsuit against AEG regarding the company's overall booking policy, which asked Ozzy Osbourne and his promoter Live Nation to book Angeles, not the Forum, if he wanted to book an appointment at the O2 Arena in London. AEG officials said they began asking artists to sign the Staples Center letter of commitmentAzoff and James Dolan & # 39;Azoff MSG Entertainment, an accusation that both Azoff and Dolan deny.
Osbourne sued AEG in federal court and won a key victory last month when a judge ruled against a motion to dismiss the case by AEG's lawyers, allowing a possible trial to go forward. In September, AEG announced the end of its block booking policy, and Osbourne and Azoff later declared the victory to Osbourne's attorney. Dan Wall from Latham & Watkins telling Display panel the case was effectively over and Osbourne would abandon his request for injunctive relief.
Wall filled in the necessary documents for the case to be dismissed, but to the great surprise of many, Anschutz issued a statement the next day declaring victory in the case, claiming that "the lawsuit was a transparent ploy public relations booking policy that was an effective competitive response to the MSG-Forum tie. "You can read the entire statement here.
Sharon Osbourne is now answering the word of Anschutz and has just sent the following statement. A representative from Osbourne said that she had intentionally wrongly written the name of Anschutz (we had to check).
Sharon Osbourne Statement on the trial of AEG
We know that Mr. Anshultz (aka "Daddy Big Bucks") lives in his billionaire bubble, but the fact is that Ozzy sued AEG for his right to perform at O2 in London. We won the case and Ozzy's O2 show went on sale on September 5th for a show next year (February 11, 2019). Ozzy plays O2 without having to play at Staples Center, that's all that matters to us. Since the beginning of this dialogue in February, it is a struggle for respect for artists and their personal preferences. It was not then and it is not now a battle between the promoters, this is what the recent declaration of the AEG describes as "victory".
Saying that this "lawsuit was initiated by Azoff and paid for by MSG and Live Nation" and that "it was created on the back of an artist who, in our opinion, has no idea what he was biting" , is fake and disrespectful to Ozzy, myself and the entire team working on this tour. Whatever differences you have with Irving Azoff, do not assume that you know who initiated the lawsuit or know anything about Ozzy Osbourne, because you obviously do not know anything about the story of Ozzy or from mine. So stop with your hubbildy, Bubbuldy BULLSHIT and your little piss contest with Live Nation and MSG.
With respect to the allegations in the AEG statement that this "lawsuit was a transparent public relations ploy", if that was indeed the case, why then did AEG precipitate a declaration of victory? While we, throughout this process, until now, we have made only one statement regarding the initial filing.
Ozzy's preference was to perform at the Forum, a place that has been part of his musical history for more than 46 years. From the beginning, it was not a battle for Ozzy, but for other artists who had to abide by these rules and regulations. Do not forget all why you are here … the artists.
The only interesting thing in your statement was your pitiful attempt at humor with your quote, according to which Ozzy "had no idea what he was biting". If you're interested, Ozzy and I have something good. … we are losing!
[ad_2]
Source link
