Kevin Ollie hit with NCAA charges of unethical conduct



[ad_1]

Photo: Kevin C. Cox (Getty Images)

Six months after being sacked as head coach of the UConn men's basketball team, Kevin Ollie was charged with unethical conduct, among other violations, on the part of the NCAA, which could result in a major penalty, according to a report by Myron Medcalf. from ESPN.

According to the report:

According to the first notice of allegations, Ollie was charged with multiple offenses (induced recruitment benefits, exceeding practice times, failure to comply with a climate of compliance, lack of monitoring of players' external training), who would all be liable for a breach of the coaches' liability. .

Ollie is specifically accused of arranging phone calls from a five-star rookie with Allen and Gay; have inadmissible contacts with a recruit; provide forbidden meals to a pair of recruits during unofficial visits; shoot with a recruit during an unofficial visit; do not supervise [Derek] Hamilton, who, according to the NCAA, would have broken the rules by training UConn players on campus and near his home in Atlanta; and give Hamilton tickets to a football match between UConn and South Florida, a violation of the NCAA because Hamilton's son was a potential candidate at the time, according to the NCAA.

The most important allegation is that Ollie reportedly told investigators misleading or false information about the heavy charges of talking to a former college teammate, Ray Allen, who, according to ESPN, " was refuted by several witnesses "his friend, Derek Hamilton, to execute a shootaround.

These charges stem from Glen Miller, a former assistant to UConn, who provided the NCAA with all the information regarding these alleged violations by Ollie and other staff members. However, Danny Griffin, the team's former team development director and Ollie's friend, refutes Miller's credibility and claims that the key witness is only seeking revenge on Olli for "ruining his life" after having fired.

The university will not be held liable for any of these allegations, allegedly for referring Ollie "for good cause" in March, even though the reason for the termination was only vaguely related to what was then only an NCAA survey on UConn recruitment. In an official statement, the school kissed in front of the NCAA, claiming that its findings corresponded to what UConn initially suspected, and that she thought she had made "difficult but appropriate decisions to protect the responsibility," she said. integrity and success of our athletes. program now and in the future. This, of course, comes from the program that supported former coach Jim Calhoun. The NCAA suspended him for three days because of recruitment violations.

Ollie is still waiting for arbitration hearings in his fight for the remaining $ 10 million owed to him under his contract, and has always denied any intentional wrongdoing at UConn. In the six seasons as head coach of the Huskies, Ollie recorded a record of 127-79 and a national champion title in 2014. However, over the last two seasons, he has managed to get a combined record of 30-35. It would not have been a surprise if the program had decided to part with Ollie then, given its reputation, but the timing of UConn's allegations, combined with that of the NCAA, led Ollie's lawyer to believe kind of work in tandem.

"Coach Kevin Ollie is reputed to have restored the integrity of the UConn men's basketball program and promoted a climate of NCAA compliance after a period of suspension of the tournament team," said Parenteau. "Under Ollie's leadership, the men's basketball program has had the best school results in the country. A complete turnaround.

"Coach Ollie strongly disagrees with the details of the allegations made in the NCAA notification and is disappointed that the NCAA has chosen to align with the University of Connecticut as part of the ongoing arbitration. Coach Ollie denied that he had engaged in conduct that would constitute a breach of the rules and regulations of the NCAA and is anxious to defend himself and his reputation. "

Ollie has 90 days to respond to the allegations before the process continues.

[ad_2]
Source link