[ad_1]
Have you ever noticed that every time whites get caught in saying something racist or saying something racist, the first thing they want to do is throw in the defense, "It's not really who I am"? Have you ever noticed that whites would do something racist to a black person and then expect that person to be understanding and not offend? It happens all the time, but it does not become less annoying.
Take for example Lynsey Plasco-Flaxman, a white mother of two who is married to Manhattan financier Joel Plasco. The New York Post announced that in 2016, the mother had decided to hire a new nanny to help her take care of her children, the latter having not worked. When her new nanny appeared, Plasco-Flaxman panicked because she was black.
Plasco-Flaxman was so panicked that she tried to send an SMS to her husband to let him know that a black man had come to their home to take care of their children. She took out her phone and pulled a message saying, "NOOOOOOOOOOO, ANOTHER BLACK PERSON." Plasco-Flaxman was so upset that she sent the message to her husband twice.
Except that … the text did not go to her husband. He went to the new nanny herself, Giselle Maurice. Oops.
When Plasco-Flaxman realized his mistake, she immediately fired Maurice saying that she was feeling "uncomfortable".
Imagine that. The white woman who sent a text offensively racist not once but two times was uncomfortable because the subject of his racist missive saw him without fail on his part.
Plasco-Flaxman claims to have had a bad experience with the nurse who immediately preceded Maurice and that this nurse was simply black, so this time, they hoped not to have another Black, but rather a Philippine.
For Maurice, the work had to be a six-month concert for which she would be paid $ 350 a day. That's a lot of money to lose, so Maurice, 44, has filed a lawsuit for lost wages. She stated in the mail that Plasco-Flaxman and her husband had paid her for the day she had presented and sent her home to an Uber.
"I [want] to show them, look, you do not do this stuff, "said Maurice at the Post, adding," I know it's a discrimination. "
The Plascos think that they were justified in dismissing Maurice. After all, how could they trust him to take care of their children after Mrs. Plasco-Flaxman made such a racist and offensive comment about her?
Joel Plasco, co-chairman of investment bank Dalmore Group, told the post office[My wife] sent him something that she did not want to say. She is not racist. We are not racist people. But would you put your children in the hands of someone you were rude to, even if it was by mistake? Your newborn? Come on. "
Just in case it is not a sufficiently clear statement, let me break it down for you.
First of all, Plasco claims that his wife – whose first instinct was to make a racist comment – is not at all racist. They are not racist people! GOING. The last nanny was a bad one, and that was totally because she was black and not just because she was, you know, a bad nanny or something of the sort. If a black nanny is bad, all black nannies are bad, idiots. It's not a stereotype or a racism, it's just what we think in the Plascos' mind.
Then, even if Maurice had not given them any indication that she had any ill will towards them, they manifesting racism and acting in bad taste, they immediately deviated and transferred the burden of this bad behavior to Mauritius – as if it were her fault they made the racist comment.
How can you trust a black person with whom you are racist to be nice to you after? Is it logical?
Maurice told the Post that the racist text would not have treated him differently.
"This is my reputation. Why should I do something to a baby? "I was ready to work with her and prove to her that she was wrong, but that was her conscience and she could no longer work with me."
Exactly.
Whites can never face the consequences of their actions. They are not used to being held responsible because white privilege and white supremacy are the most intoxicating drugs. Being caught red-handed was arguably the worst thing for one or the other.
The fact is, if you know that you acted in a shocking manner – which they clearly admit to defending the reason for which they sent it back – why would you object to someone whom you had promised job and then took it off because of your own blunder?
Maurice told La Poste that she had tried to settle the dispute with the Plascos through mediation and that, when they had refused, she had taken legal action.
Joel Plasco told the Post that he and his wife owed nothing to Mauritius because they had no contract. He called his trial "extortion".
"I'm not someone who has millions of dollars hanging out to pay people who come after me for extortion. And now you play directly in his hands, "he said.
"My wife was two months away from her baby, in a very difficult situation. Are you going to sue someone like that? It is not a very good thing to do.
Oh, Mr. Plasco. I do not think you really want to do a pissing match on what's beautiful and what's not. Do you?
Source link
