[ad_1]
<div _ngcontent-c15 = "" innerhtml = "
Intel has a long history in the technology sector and is generally considered a patriarchal and conservative entity, at least as far as its public image is concerned. Intel does not often participate in public discussions with competitors, and even if the company decides to speak on a particular subject, it does not generally designate any competitor. In one of his latest News Bytes, however, Steven R. Rodgers, Intel lambastes Qualcomm, and executive vice president and legal advisor of Intel Corp., goes up to the call. an "illegal" scheme without a license, without a chip "."
Qualcomm is involved in patent litigation with a number of companies around the world, including Intel and Apple, claiming that many of these companies would not have been able to produce their wireless products without infringing Qualcomm's patents. Esscomm essentially claims that its patents are the foundation of today's mobile communications technologies and many futures, so any company producing cellular modems and associated wireless transceivers for mobile networks is a potential offender.
And the Intel 5G modem.Intel
Steven R. Rodgers points out that Qualcomm has already been fined $ 975 million in China, $ 850 million in Korea, $ 1.2 billion in the European Commission and $ 773 million in Taiwan for anti-competitive practices. a reduced fine. He also mentions that Qualcomm was found in violation of Japan's competition laws and that the United States is currently seeking Qualcomm for possible antitrust violations.
"In most cases, we have chosen and will continue to choose to respond to Qualcomm's statements in court and not in public." said Rodgers, "This week, in a lawsuit, Qualcomm failed to win 88 patent claims that were allegedly infringed by products, including Intel's modem." In another case, however, Rodgers also mentioned that a federal judge had found convincing evidence that Qualcomm had required certain companies to accept a separate license for Qualcomm's cellular patents in order to access Qualcomm's modems. for their products. This, says Rodgers, is at the base of the "no license, no chips" maneuver that put Qualcomm to hot water in some countries.
A number of lawsuits are ongoing, so it remains to be seen how this will happen as the future 5G and new networks and devices unfold, but you can expect many fireworks over the next few years. years, while all parties involved continue to defend themselves vigorously. their patents and related technologies.
">
Intel has a long history in the technology sector and is generally considered a patriarchal and conservative entity, at least as far as its public image is concerned. Intel does not often participate in public discussions with competitors, and even if the company decides to speak on a particular subject, it does not generally designate any competitor. In one of his latest News Bytes, however, Steven R. Rodgers, Intel lambastes Qualcomm, and executive vice president and legal advisor of Intel Corp., goes up to the call. an "illegal" scheme without a license, without a chip "."
Qualcomm is involved in patent litigation with a number of companies around the world, including Intel and Apple, claiming that many of these companies would not have been able to produce their wireless products without infringing Qualcomm's patents. Esscomm essentially claims that its patents are the foundation of today's mobile communications technologies and many futures, so any company producing cellular modems and associated wireless transceivers for mobile networks is a potential offender.
Steven R. Rodgers points out that Qualcomm has already been fined $ 975 million in China, $ 850 million in Korea, $ 1.2 billion in the European Commission and $ 773 million in Taiwan for anti-competitive practices. a reduced fine. He also mentions that Qualcomm was found in violation of Japan's competition laws and that the United States is currently seeking Qualcomm for possible antitrust violations.
"In most cases, we have chosen and will continue to choose to respond to Qualcomm's statements in court and not in public." said Rodgers, "This week, in a lawsuit, Qualcomm failed to win 88 patent claims that were allegedly infringed by products, including Intel's modem." In another case, however, Rodgers also mentioned that a federal judge had found convincing evidence that Qualcomm had required certain companies to accept a separate license for Qualcomm's cellular patents in order to access Qualcomm's modems. for their products. This, says Rodgers, is at the base of the "no license, no chips" maneuver that put Qualcomm to hot water in some countries.
A number of lawsuits are ongoing, so it remains to be seen how this will happen as the future 5G and new networks and devices unfold, but you can expect many fireworks over the next few years. years, while all parties involved continue to defend themselves vigorously. their patents and related technologies.
