[ad_1]
<div _ngcontent-c15 = "" innerhtml = "
& # 39; Aladdin & # 39;Walt Disney
As we hinted yesterday afternoon, we have just received our first trailer for Aladdin. The live remake of Walt Disney's rare gem (it netted $ 217 million in-house and $ 504 million in 1992 worldwide) is expected for the Memorial Day weekend, a setting in which Disney did not have the best chance to live a great fantasy movie. movies. An approximate figure Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Men Do not Tell Stories ($ 177 million worldwide but $ 794 million worldwide) would be perfect for this fantasy led by Guy Ritchie.
Aladdin is definitely a safer bet than Solo: A story of Star Wars, Alice through the mirror and Tomorrowland. What should I also note about Aladdin is he at the opposite of Solo (Disney's Day of Remembrance movie of this year) in a very specific way. Simply, while SoloThe greatest artistic achievement (be it pure fiction) was also his biggest business challenge (it was a challenge Star wars movie and very little not an event film). Conversely, with AladdinOf course, his biggest commercial hook will have at least the potential to be his biggest artistic hurdle.
Unlike all other previous live Disney live remakes, Aladdin is partially defined by a specific actor in a specific role. I'm talking about the iconic role of Robin Williams as Genius in the 1992 animated film. His stage robbery stunt (he does not show up until the end of the first act) was really a case from "Williams being Williams". Unlike most previous Disney Toons (and the majority of those who followed), the original Aladdin is partially driven by a specific movie star, which gives it very specific performance.
The success of Williams in Aladdin, although this is not his first animated role (see also: FernGully: The last rainforest), launched an era when big animation films were filled with actors of names taking advantage of their star characters. It's still going on, for better or for worse. Despite all, 25 years later, few animated tours (maybe Tom Hanks in Toy story, Ellen DeGeneres in The world of Nemo and Mike Myers in Shrek) became as closely associated with the actor who expressed it as Williams Genius.
contrary to The beauty and the Beast, Dumbo, Pete's Dragon or Maleficent, the live-action Aladdin will be compared not only to the animated film from which it comes, but more particularly to how a huge movie star playing a main character, compares to another big movie star playing a main character.
As a rule of thumb, Will Smith's main role in your big-budget fantasy movie appears in the "win" column (see: Team, suicide). However, the questionable commercial asset of the film could also be his main artistic argument. The late Williams will no longer be there to give his blessing to the new incarnation.
The casting of Will Smith, who will likely propose a very different incarnation of Robin Williams (or Dan Castellaneta, who expressed the character in The return of Jafar and an animated series of 86 episodes), was the most intelligent piece that Disney could have played. If you are going to create a live-action version of Aladdin and Robin Williams is not around, you have no choice but to move to a whole new extreme. But comparisons will always be made and (unlike most Disney sites) an essential reason why Aladdin is as popular as it is specifically due to a singular movie star performance.
Much of the conversation about the film was centered on the fact that Disney was primarily speaking in the lead role of Indian actors (Mena Massoud, Naomi Scott, Marwen Kenzari, etc.) in the lead role, cultural aspects and gender issues (issues that were raised during the first filming of the film in theaters). I am sure that Ritchie and his friends will do everything they can to avoid "problems". The people running Disney may not be saints, but they are not idiots. I guess that's not the case, but I presume Billy Magnussen does NOT win the princess's heart and that, true to form, Jasmine will end up with Aladdin at the time of the credits.
Nevertheless, a great deal of whether Aladdin Probably the reason for Disney's ongoing raid in his busy library, at least artistically, is whether Will Smith's genius can stand the test compared to Williams' iconic tour.
">
As we hinted yesterday afternoon, we have just received our first trailer for Aladdin. The live remake of Walt Disney's rare gem (it netted $ 217 million in-house and $ 504 million in 1992 worldwide) is expected for the Memorial Day weekend, a setting in which Disney did not have the best chance to live a great fantasy movie. movies. An approximate figure Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Men Do not Tell Stories ($ 177 million worldwide but $ 794 million worldwide) would be perfect for this fantasy led by Guy Ritchie.
Aladdin is definitely a safer bet than Solo: A story of Star Wars, Alice through the mirror and Tomorrowland. What should I also note about Aladdin is he at the opposite of Solo (Disney's Day of Remembrance movie of this year) in a very specific way. Simply, while SoloThe greatest artistic achievement (be it pure fiction) was also his biggest business challenge (it was a challenge Star wars movie and very little not an event film). Conversely, with AladdinOf course, his biggest commercial hook will have at least the potential to be his biggest artistic hurdle.
Unlike all other previous live Disney live remakes, Aladdin is partially defined by a specific actor in a specific role. I'm talking about the iconic role of Robin Williams as Genius in the 1992 animated film. His stage robbery stunt (he does not show up until the end of the first act) was really a case from "Williams being Williams". Unlike most previous Disney Toons (and the majority of those who followed), the original Aladdin is partially driven by a specific movie star, which gives it very specific performance.
The success of Williams in Aladdin, although this is not his first animated role (see also: FernGully: The last rainforest), launched an era when big animation films were filled with actors of names taking advantage of their star characters. It's still going on, for better or for worse. Despite all, 25 years later, few animated tours (maybe Tom Hanks in Toy story, Ellen DeGeneres in The world of Nemo and Mike Myers in Shrek) became as closely associated with the actor who expressed it as Williams Genius.
contrary to The beauty and the Beast, Dumbo, Pete's Dragon or Maleficent, the live-action Aladdin will be compared not only to the animated film from which it comes, but more particularly to how a huge movie star playing a main character, compares to another big movie star playing a main character.
As a rule of thumb, Will Smith's main role in your big-budget fantasy movie appears in the "win" column (see: Team, suicide). However, the questionable commercial asset of the film could also be his main artistic argument. The late Williams will no longer be there to give his blessing to the new incarnation.
The casting of Will Smith, who will likely propose a very different incarnation of Robin Williams (or Dan Castellaneta, who expressed the character in The return of Jafar and an animated series of 86 episodes), was the most intelligent piece that Disney could have played. If you are going to create a live-action version of Aladdin and Robin Williams is not around, you have no choice but to move to a whole new extreme. But comparisons will always be made and (unlike most Disney sites) an essential reason why Aladdin is as popular as it is specifically due to a singular movie star performance.
Much of the conversation about the film was centered on the fact that Disney was primarily speaking in the lead role of Indian actors (Mena Massoud, Naomi Scott, Marwen Kenzari, etc.) in the lead role, cultural aspects and gender issues (issues that were raised during the first filming of the film in theaters). I am sure that Ritchie and his friends will do everything they can to avoid "problems". The people running Disney may not be saints, but they are not idiots. I guess that's not the case, but I presume Billy Magnussen does NOT win the princess's heart and that, true to form, Jasmine will end up with Aladdin at the time of the credits.
Nevertheless, a great deal of whether Aladdin Probably the reason for Disney's ongoing raid in his busy library, at least artistically, is whether Will Smith's genius can stand the test compared to Williams' iconic tour.
