CBI vs. CBI updates: After Alok Verma, the scheme targets Rajeshwar Singh, one of the representatives of the ED, says Subramanian Swamy LIVE, the latest updates, a live blog, the highlights and live coverage


[ad_1]

CBI vs CBI latest updates: In response to the CBI vs CBI line, BJP MP Subramanian Swamy expressed his apprehension that the BJP government might try to protect P Chidambaram. "A group of four is working against Prime Minister Modi, the image of our party is being undermined, Nirav Modi, Choksi and Mallya have escaped, how can we fight corruption if it continues? He is always the best, but his staff are working against him, "he said.

The Congress attacked the Center on Thursday after four "suspects" from the Intelligence Bureau were arrested in front of the residence of Alok Verma, the director of the IWC, who had been sent on leave a day ago, claiming that "IB leads the way of the IWC".

"After transforming CBI into a" central burial of investigations, "the (Narendra) Modi government is now lowering to a" new low, "said Randeep Singh Surjewala, spokesman for the US Congress.

Intelligence Bureau sources said that its officials are regularly deployed in high security areas to collect intelligence data. Sources indicated that local law enforcement agencies were also kept informed, but their presence was misinterpreted.

The Supreme Court agreed to admit a new petition filed by attorney Prashant Bhushan, who called for the opening of an SIT investigation against IWC officials, including Rakesh Asthana.

The Central Vigilance Commission (CVC) accused IBC director Alok Verma, who was dismissed on Wednesday, of failing to cooperate in the production of documents and records on the allegations against him and his "obstruction deliberate operation of the Commission ". is established."

In its order of eight pages published on Tuesday, the CVC spoke of the complaint forwarded by the Cabinet Secretary on August 24 regarding allegations including "serious allegations regarding the operation of the director of CBI".

It lists three allegations "of a serious nature with a prima-facie angle of vigilance that must be examined promptly by searching for records at the IWC".

One allegation relates to "payment by Satish Babu Sana of 2 Rs crore to IWC director to avoid further interrogation in a case related to Moin Qureshi and others".

Image of representation. AFP

Image of representation. AFP

Another allegation concerns "alleged interference and CBI director's efforts to exclude one of the main suspects, namely Rakesh Saxena" in a case of 2017 related to IRCTC.

"It is also alleged that the IWC Director passed instructions to CBI Co-Director Vineet Vinayak forbidding him to search the premises of Lalu Yadav, after which the IWC Director was persuaded by the authorities concerned that Vinayak was authorized at the last moment. by the director of CBI to abscond by a private airline to search the premises of Lalu Yadav, "said the order.

The order lists the efforts made by CVC to obtain records of both cases and notes that they have not been submitted.

He also noted that the report on a secret note had not been received even after 10 months despite reminders.

"It can be seen that the Director CBI has not co-operated in making available the documents / records requested by the Commission concerning certain serious allegations … In view of the non-cooperation and non-compliance, the Commission is not able to give his function, "said the anti-corruption watchdog.

The order stated that the IWC of 18 September 2018 referred to the "secret note" concerning the IWC Special Director, Rakesh Asthana, and informed the Commission that the concern over the integrity of the IWC was over. agent was true and that she had also found evidence of her criminal conduct in at least half a dozen cases and the officer is aware of the possession of evidence of her criminal conduct by the Bureau.

The order stated that the IWC demanded that the Asthana complaint be considered as a desperate attempt by an officer to intimidate officers of the various ranks of the IWC and that this complaint be not admissible.

The complaint was filed by Asthana, but the order does not reveal his identity and states that "it is presumptive on the part of CBI to declare that a particular person has complained".

"The content of the allegations made in the complaint is more important than the identity of the complainant," he said.

The order also stated that Asthana had made several oral and written statements alleging from time to time that Verma was prejudiced and biased against him and sought to involve him in certain cases. officers other than Verma and AK Sharma, Deputy Director (P), be appointed.

The order indicated that a climate of hostility and factional strife had reached its peak in the context of the IWC, which could damage its reputation and credibility. "Serious allegations of corruption of senior officials against each other also tainted the organization's work environment, which has profound and visible repercussions on other officers."

The CVC stated that the order had been passed taking into account the "extraordinary and emerging situation".

The Ministry of Personnel and Training made another order Tuesday, depriving Asthana of "duties, powers, duties and supervisory role in any way".
The DoPT order indicated that the central government was looking closely at recent developments resulting from the actions of Verma and Asthana.

He noted that the CVC had undertaken a survey of specific problems and had committed to remain neutral, independent and independent of anyone.

The order also says that the central government invokes its powers because of "extraordinary and unprecedented situation".

[ad_2]Source link