Four debates of the last senatorial debate between Heitkamp and Cramer



[ad_1]

North Dakota Heidi HeitkampMary (Heidi) Kathryn Heitkamp Heitkamp raises more than a million dollars during the first 17 days of October. The Hill & # 39; s Morning Report – Presented by PhRMA – Concerns Growing Faced with Political Violence Approaching the Mid-term. (D) and Rep. Kevin CramerKevin John Cramer Heitkamp raises more than a million dollars during the first 17 days of October. The Hill & # 39; s Morning Report – Presented by PhRMA – Concerns Growing Faced with Political Violence Approaching the Mid-term. (R) clashed over health care, tariffs and the President TrumpDonald John Trump: The Trump Administration Takes Action to Ban Migrant Asylum Claims from Central America Friday night in their last Senate debate.

Heitkamp and Cramer compete for one of the most competitive races in this cycle. Both parties hope that a victory in the state will allow them to win a majority in the Senate.

Recent polls showed that the race was moving away from Heitkamp, ​​but the incumbent Democratic prime minister defeated her GOP rival against ObamaCare on Friday while she was defending her seat in a state that President Trump had won by 36 points in 2016.

Here are four takeaways from Friday night debate:

The gloves broke loose – eventually

The debate began on a more positive note, with both candidates calling for civility after sending a series of homemade bombs to Democrats this week.

And while the two men found common ground on issues such as immigration and the Paris climate agreement, the gloves broke loose when the subject was transferred to the field of the health.

Cramer and Heitkamp fought for at least 10 minutes in a row, uninterrupted by the moderators, a series of zingers pulling the audience's reactions audibly.

The candidates made their voices heard in another animated segment by offering protections to those already affected and clashing in a fiery segment on the tariffs.

And when he discussed social security reforms, Cramer made an indirect reference to Heitkamp fleeing the polls.

"She's in Hail Mary mode, I understand that," he said.

Other parts of the debate have elicited lighter comments, particularly as a result of a particularly long exchange on health care.

"It's fun," Cramer said. "That's why they came here."

"It's a real debate," Heitkamp agreed.

Health care brings the most acute shock

Health care continues to be the dominant theme of Congressional campaigns during this cycle. And like other races on the battlefield, pre-existing conditions became the most important friction point on Friday night.

Heitkamp has continuously criticized Cramer for his numerous votes to repeal ObamaCare, while evoking an anti-ObamaCare lawsuit led by states led by the GOP, which threatened to remove protections granted to people with pre-existing disorders.

"Do not be sated: you voted five times in favor of ObamaCare's repeal, you voted in favor of eliminating the protection of the patient … the support of a prosecution for the sole purpose of eliminating the protections for pre-existing conditions, "she said. "I hear the double talk there."

"We can not do politics with our health care," she said later.

Cramer responded that the plans he supported "unambiguously" would protect the coverage of people with pre-existing diseases and that states can provide this coverage.

He later referred to a family member who needed insulin, saying that they were struggling to pay for the current system.

"If they can not afford it today, they certainly can not afford it. tomorrow, Intervint Heitkamp.

Cramer responded that they could afford the drug before the Affordable Care Act.

"It's not affordable, it's not an access"It's ticking the box saying I have a blanket that I can not afford to use."

Cramer praises Trump's support

Throughout the debate, Cramer made it clear that he was an unequivocal ally of Trump's.

The GOP congressman praised the president's leadership on Russia and his decision to impose high tariffs on China.

Cramer explained that even when he and the President disagree on policy, he broadly supports the president's approach.

"I think the president could act prematurely, very honestly," he said of Trump's decision to withdraw from the Mid-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty with Russia.

But he added later that "if he says he wants to do it that way, I will support him."

At one point, Cramer even apologized for breaking with the president when it was necessary to stay in the Paris deal on climate change, which provoked audible reactions from Heitkamp and members of the audience.

"That's where the president and I do not agree, I'm really sorry, Mr. President," said Cramer.

During another exchange of rates, Heitkamp sought to take advantage of Cramer's links with Trump.

"He's doing everything for the president and me for North Dakota," she said.

Rates are always a flash point

The tariffs and Trump's long trade battle with a number of countries provoked a new word war between the candidates, highlighting a problem in the Midwest and Heartland campaigns.

Heitkamp criticized Trump's tariffs for hurting farmers in North Dakota, saying they were struggling to sell products like soybeans.

"There is no discussion, farmers are hurt," she said. "His [Cramer’s] CNN said farmers should be satisfied with prices. They are not happy, they are nervous. "

Cramer has widely defended Trump on the issue of tariffs. He praised the President for standing up for US trade interests and for his recent work to renegotiate the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), now known as the United States-Canada Agreement. Mexico-Canada (USMCA).

Heitkamp again referred Cramer for his alignment with the president.

"The blind trust in this administration is not well placed," she said. "You'd better stand by the farmers of North Dakota and North Dakota's agriculture, you'd better stand by our people."

But Cramer retorted, "Stand alongside Communist China, it's not stand alongside North Dakota."

[ad_2]
Source link