[ad_1]
It was a good game. The Saints scored 35 points in the first period, while Drew Brees scored three goals. Jared Goff led the Rams along the way after a 21-point deficit to tie things up in the fourth. Then, at the end of the fourth quarter, the Saints got the ball on their own territory with just three points in advance. It was third place.
New Orleans chilled the match. Brees hit Michael Thomas on the sidelines for a 72-yard touchdown. Thomas then did something that made this fantastic game even more memorable: he reached out under the protections surrounding the goal post, pulled out an old flip phone and pretended to make a call. Joe Horn had done the same thing 15 years earlier. It looked like it was the same phone.
It was funny! This was unannounced. It was silly, sincere and smart, and one of the best celebrations of the year in TD. the Times-Picayune I had some great photos. Thomas told reporters he had bought two flip phones in a "liquor store" and placed them in one or the other area. (Horn made the mistake of storing a phone in one attack zone and had to wait for weeks mark in the bad.) Thomas stated that he did not want to hurt his team during the celebration, which was a 15-yard penalty, and that he would not have done it until the fourth quarter. It was an instant celebration of the touchdown that was one of the best football games of the season.
The advertisers were crazy. "It's very unusual for Michael Thomas," said Troy Aikman immediately after the touchdown. "It's too big a game to risk this kind of jobsite." The cameras showed Thomas talking to Payton on the sidelines.
OK of course. The Rams had the ball alone 42 during the ensuing kickoff. (In Thomas's defense, there were two missed tackles.) Aikman was still angry: "I just do not understand, Joe, this is the last guy, the last wide receiver of superstar you're waiting for. just for his business, he does not have all the theatricality and yet, at one of the most important moments of this game, he takes out a cell phone. "
It continued that way. Advertisers do not even have mention Joe Horn. The show kept viewers less informed for 10 minutes, perhaps as a protest? The field interview was not really about touch taking or fun celebration. The question asked by Erin Andrews to Thomas about the celebration, which finally mentioned Joe Horn, was: "What did Sean Payton think about it?
The Fox team at the post-match show was also angry about it. "I'm sure it would be a little different story if he had ended up losing the football game," said host Menefee Curt.
"I did not like it then," said Michael Strahan, referring to the original version of Joe Horn. "I did not like it now. But I think guys want to be creative, they want to do something different from what others do. I do not like it when you make the pillar, because there is also a kind of respect when you make a touchdown. "Howie Long had more:" And if they score quickly? He said, shaking his head.
Even Mike Francesa, who would be a well-known sports radio host, but is probably an elaborate hoax, the New York media joke the rest of the country with the last decades, came out against her:
If nobody talks about the game, it will be because Fox and you spend so much time denigrating the celebration!
If all this sounds familiar to you, that's what happened 15 years ago. When Horn hid a mobile phone under the goal post to celebrate a hit, the TV guys pretended to have taken a shit out of Vince Lombardi's hat. Tony Kornheiser said that Horn "should be fined $ 1 million," he at least tried to explain why the celebration was so bad: "[I]It's not just a little fun. It's a calculated thing to embarrass everyone. It's just about anything. It's for him to get a contract with Nokia, AT & T, Sprint or whoever makes these phones. How is a cell phone embarrassing? What's wrong with getting a sponsorship deal in the sloppy NFL advertising? And here's what Joe Theismann, then from ESPN, wrote about it:
I agree with Saints coach Jim Haslett when he said that Horn's actions are not what the saints are. It was a classless thing and extremely discouraging for Horn. It was a pure example of selfish football that could have cost the Saints victory if the Giants had been able to take advantage of the superb field position that resulted from the excessive celebration penalty. The saints and the league will probably go both well Horn and he deserves to lose money.
Horn's penalty came with a 17-7 win for the Saints in a match where they won 45-7 against a team that finished 4-12. Theismann, as the post-game Fox crew, insisted on the celebration penalty even though the saints have won and nothing bad has happened. There is no doubt that so many events are as enthusiastic about Thomas's fine against the NFL as it is about Theismann for Horn who is losing money. A guy takes out a cell phone to celebrate a touchdown and someone, no matter who, no matter where, thinks he should lose money because of it? (ESPN says Horn has been fined $ 30,000 for his second such offense and Thomas will lose at least $ 13,369.) That's not nice.
It's good that Horn and Thomas have been reported. Obviously, "putting a mobile phone under the poles so you can remove it after you've scored a touchdown and pretend to make a phone call as a sign of celebration" goes against the rules of football. But what is really wrong? Could Michael Thomas have destroyed the structural integrity of the padding around the goal post by hiding a cell phone underneath? Did Thomas make a call on this phone? What was true of Horn remains true of Thomas. His celebration of the touchdown was not shocking. It's not naughty. It's not really mocking. Thomas is fundamentally a respectful student of the history of the game! He could have used Ickey Shuffle, but instead.
Horn was delighted. "When I saw him take out that cell phone, I tore it up," he said. "It's something some kids do not do, to pay homage to an old soul. For him, doing it on a national stage took a lot of courage. I am humble. "See, is it cute?
Strahan said it detracted from the great game viewers had just seen. Come on; This is not the case. Celebrations with simple props can not be so bad when a complex choreographic celebration, which is arguably much worse than pretending to make a phone call to celebrate a touchdown, is touted as "amazing" on the official NFL Twitter account.
Not a single broadcaster explained what was wrong about using an accessory to celebrate. Thomas was not even the only saint to have used one to celebrate Sunday's game: Benjamin Watson put the ball under his shirt to simulate a pregnancy after his touchdown; Watson's wife has twins (the sixth and seventh children of the couple). A real moment "look at me" by Watson, I guess.
Strahan wanted Thomas to celebrate with his team. Joe Horn himself had an answer to that:
In any case, if you can believe it, some old broadcasters have complained of a touchdown celebration.
[ad_2]
Source link
