[ad_1]
An instant report obtained by Yahoo Sports indicates that a "third party" would not "agree" with the center's and command center's decision to call targeting calls in the USC Trojans match -Washington State Cougars on September 21st. called.
The play took place late in the third quarter of the Trojans' 39-36 victory when linebacker Logan Tago of Washington contacted helmet-counter-helmet with US quarterback JT Daniels after Daniels took a knee and was helpless.
Field officials called Tago for abusing the smuggler without targeting before he was sent to the retransmission booth and the San Francisco Command Center for further examination.
"The replay booth and the control center agreed that it was a fault of targeting, but unfortunately, a third party did not accept. So the targeting was deleted and we went to the RPS field decision. [roughing the passer] without targeting, "said the internal report, written by the head of the retransmission, Gary McNanna, and obtained by Yahoo Sports." It did not play well on TV. Inverted my stop for TGT [targeting] do not TGT ".
Through sources, Yahoo Sports has identified the "third party" as being Pac-12's General Counsel and Senior Vice President of Commercial Affairs, Woodie Dixon, who is not an official qualified but who is in the re-run command center.
The Commissioner of Pac-12, Larry Scott, told Yahoo Sports that a "third party" was not involved in the call.
"Our instant replay supervisor [Bill Richardson] is the ultimate decision maker, "Scott told Yahoo Sports. The erroneous perception that, in this case, the final decision of the command center was made by someone other than the instant replay supervisor is a concern. "
Another face-to-face clash in the same match between USC Porter Porter Gustin and Gardner Minshew quarterback from Washington State resulted in a non-penalty that did not reach the revision phase for officials replay. If called, the state of Washington would have had a first and goal situation of the 10-yard line with 2:40 remaining in the match.
If the targeting had been called in both cases, Tago and Gustin would have been kicked out of the game.
The next day, Scott told the Associated Press that Gustin's hit "was very, very close, no doubt about it". He then stated that his comments had been misinterpreted and that he was trying to explain that every game is examined in real time, even if the action in the field is not interrupted, Referees who call this match can take a fresh look. Scott said that he had checked with the Pac-12 officials to make sure the process had gone smoothly.
"Unfortunately, my comments were interpreted as indicating that the conference had been formally reviewed and that the conference bureau or I had officially determined that there was a correct absence and that was the word final, "Scott said. "This is not the case."
Source link
