Across the Arctic, bubbling lakes are spreading carbon dioxide, methane and other dangerous greenhouse gases



[ad_1]

ABOVE THE ARCTIC CIRCLE, ALASKA – Katey Walter Anthony has studied some 300 lakes in the Arctic tundra. But sitting on the edge of her latest discovery, the Arctic expert said she had never seen a lake like this.

Facing the austere peaks of the Western Brooks mountain range, the lake, with about twenty football fields, seemed to be boiling. Its waters whistled, bubbled and leaped as a powerful greenhouse gas escaped from the lake bed. Some bubbles grew like grapefruit, visibly lifting the surface of the water by several centimeters and carrying sludge from the bottom.

It was methane.

As permafrost thaws in the rapidly warming Arctic, it releases carbon dioxide, the main greenhouse gas that warms the planet, into the atmosphere. Sometimes this thaw stimulates the growth of lakes in the soft and depressed soil, and these deep-thawed water masses tend to release methane that strikes harder.

But not so much. This lake, which Walter Anthony nicknamed Lake Esieh, looked different. And the volume of gas that emanates from it could bring another blow to the climate system if lakes like this one were found widespread.

The first time Walter Anthony saw Esieh Lake, she was afraid it could explode – and she's no stranger to the danger, or theatricality, of methane. In 2010, the University of Alaska at Fairbanks released a video of the informed media ecologist who stood on the frozen surface of an Arctic lake and then lit a stream of methane to create a flame tower as big as it. He had almost half a million views on YouTube.

Then, in August, in the heat of the Arctic, she came back to this isolated place with a small research team, with her husband and two young sons, to see what secrets could give Lake Esieh. Was it just a weird anomaly? Or was it a sign that the Arctic thawing had begun to release an ancient source of methane that could worsen climate change?

One thing she was sure of: if Arctic warming released more methane, it could lead to … more warming. Scientists call this a feedback loop.

Geese fly at dawn at Esieh Lake in August.

Washington Post's photo by Jonathan Newton

"These lakes are accelerating the thawing of permafrost," said Walter Anthony. "It's an acceleration."

There was so much that the team would learn the instruments that they had transported here. To get a firsthand glimpse, they should enter.

They brought their combinations.

Siberia

Walter Anthony, who grew up near Lake Tahoe, was captivated by the Arctic lakes at age 19 while spending a summer at Lake Baikal in Siberia.

"I love the loneliness of secluded lakes and the mystery of what lies beneath the surface of the water."

Two decades and several college degrees later, an indigenous group in Alaska, the NANA Regional Corporation, asked him to look for methane seepage into northwestern Alaska because the gas could constitute a source of energy for isolated communities.

How do you find a lake in Alaska that is leaking methane? Well, there is a telling sign: they do not freeze completely.

In April 2017, Walter Anthony revealed to residents of Kotzebue, Alaska, that she was looking for strange lakes. This month, an email sent by a pilot led to the Noatak area, not far from the Arctic Circle. Last September, she made her first visit to the lake, on sloping hills covered with rust-colored mosses and blueberries. She brought her family and a graduate student on site, so far that it took several days of camping and that she was completely out of the grid.

At first, the gas volume at Esieh Lake was a bit terrifying, but as Walter Anthony got used to the constant stuttering of the lake, his fear gave way to wonder.

Its sounding devices have captured huge holes at the bottom of the lake. Pockmarks, she calls them, "unlike anything I've ever seen in an Arctic lake."

A rainbow illuminates Lake Esieh, with the seepage field of methane visible in the center.

Washington Post's photo by Jonathan Newton

Most of Esieh is quite shallow and averages only a little over three feet deep. But where the gas bubbles gather, the ground suddenly falls, a fall marked by the disappearance of all visible plant life.

Measurements showed that the lake dives at about 50 feet deep in one area and nearly 15 feet in another. When they first studied them, Walter Anthony and his graduate student Janelle Sharp named these two groups W1 and W2, short for "Wow 1" and "Wow 2."

The next discovery came from the laboratory.

When scientists examined gas samples, they found the chemical signature of a "geological" origin. In other words, the evacuation of the lake's methane seemed to emerge not from the direct thaw of frozen arctic soil or permafrost, but rather from a much older fossil fuel reservoir.

If it happened all over the Arctic, Walter Anthony thought that if fossil fuels buried for millennia were now exposed to the atmosphere, the planet could be even more threatened.

Equipment

For the second trip, Walter Anthony had brought in a larger team of researchers, more equipment and his family – his husband, Peter Anthony, and his sons, Jorgen, 6, and Anders, 3.

The team provided instruments for gas sampling, four inflatable boats, large crates of food, eight tents, a satellite phone for emergencies and two shotguns. As in most of Alaska's wilderness, the lake is frequented by grizzlies, and the presence of bears around the camp has made everyone aware of their surroundings.

A week before the trip, Walter Anthony had published a major study broadcasting disturbing news about Arctic lakes in general. Her husband – also a scientist at the University of Alaska at Fairbanks – was co-author.

The research focused on the central issue now driving scientists studying permafrost soils, which can reach depths of nearly 5,000 feet and have spread over tens of thousands of years. Because of the cold, these carbon-rich are never completely decomposed and the soil keeps them in an icy purgatory. Now, as the Arctic heats up, decomposition begins and releases greenhouse gases.

Scientists know that permafrost contains a huge amount of carbon – enough to warm the planet catastrophically if released into the atmosphere. But they do not know how fast it can come out and whether the changes will be gradual or rapid.

This is where the work of Walter Anthony has arrived.

The authors examined the prevalence of thermokarst lakes, which form when ice wedges in permafrost melt and create voids that then fill with water. And they found that the continued growth of these lakes – many of which have already formed in the tundra – could more than double the greenhouse gas emissions from Arctic soils by 2100. Despite the fact that lakes would cover less than 6% of the total land area of ​​the Arctic.

Scientists have been intrigued by a spectacular spike in methane concentrations in the atmosphere, which since 2006 have produced an average of 25 million tons more gas per year. Walter Anthony's study found that Arctic lakes could more than double that increase.

Overall, if Walter Anthony's conclusions are correct, the total impact of melting permafrost could be similar to the addition of two major fossil fuel emitting economies – let's say two more Germany – to the planet. And that does not take into account the possibility of more lakes like Esieh, which seems to be a different phenomenon than thermokarst lakes, emitting gases faster.

The landscape surrounding Lake Esieh itself is marked by the rapid thawing of frost.

Along the coast, much of the hill had collapsed, a shift that two team members reported had occurred since May, the date of their last visit.

This "thaw crisis" was a classic example of a rapid thawing of permafrost. He had left behind a wall of muddy ice and small islands of peat and moss.

Disturbing

If there were no bubbles, the large expanses of loamy water that they create and the fact that you could ignite emerging gases in flames (Walter Anthony l?) done at one point), Esieh Lake could be an idyllic scene. . But these features, combined with the fact that it seems to be frequented by grizzlies, make it more alien than bucolic.

But Walter Anthony and his research technician Philip Hanke, 25, were determined to explore it from the inside. On the second day of the trip, they donned suits and snorkels and plunged into cold water, less than 60 degrees.

Research Technician Philip Hanke moves a measurement chamber that records fluctuations in greenhouse gases.

Washington Post's photo by Jonathan Newton

They wanted to see the methane infiltrate closely and learn what they could by swimming among the bubbles.

Hanke went first, venturing into the more vigorous bubble site, Wow 2. There was very little visibility. But, groped in the dark, Hanke could feel the shape of things.

"It's a bit weird," he reported after surfacing. "Just inside the hole, it's a slope that has flattened and it gave way, that's where there were really loose sediments, and I could get my hands on it.

"So you say that there are several ledges?" Asked Walter Anthony.

"Yeah, it was a ledge."

The second site, much deeper, was less dark, more peaceful. Walter Anthony was still in awe when she came looking for air.

"You're just watching this stream of bubbles rising directly on your face, and they're so sweet they're all around you," she said. "And the sunlight on them. It's like we're out of this world but under this world.

Another scientist, Frédéric Thalasso, had come from Mexico City and spent days measuring the gas around the lake. His first results: Esieh's emissions were very high and clearly targeted fossil fuels.

The lakes where he had experienced similar activity were in the tropics and polluted – ideal conditions for methane production, said Thalasso, a scientist at the Center for Research and Advanced Studies at the National Polytechnic Institute in Mexico City.

But these lakes have gas flows that are "probably 100 times lower than those in this lake," he said.

His instruments also detected ethane, butane and propane – classic signatures of fossil origin.

Later, after processing his data, he estimated that the lake produced two tonnes of methane each day, the equivalent of the methane emissions of about 6,000 dairy cows (one of the largest sources of methane in the world). ). It's not enough to be a big climate problem, but if there are many more lakes like this – well, that's another story.

Hypothesis

After four nights of camping, the team went to Kotzebue, Alaska, the first leg of the return trip. Walter Anthony would not have processed all the new data for a while, but she had a pretty good assumption about what's going on in Esieh Lake.

Permafrost contains a lot of carbon, but in some places the permafrost soil and its characteristic built-up ice wedges are also found on top of old fossil fuel reserves, including methane. As the Arctic heats up – which is twice as fast as the rest of the Earth – these gases could be released into the atmosphere.

The holes in the bottom of Lake Esieh could therefore be an underwater cousin of some craters that have appeared in the Siberian tundra in recent years, allegedly caused by underground gas explosions.

If so, Lake Esieh becomes a kind of hybrid – and disturbing.

A breakfast of cranberries and blueberries picked fresh in the tundra of Lake Esieh, in northwestern Alaska.

Washington Post's photo by Jonathan Newton

It is not a pure thermokarstic lake, although some thermokarst seem to form around the lake's expanding edges, knocking down coastal trees when permafrost ice melts and the ground becomes destabilized. But the melting of permafrost at the bottom of the lake might also have released some old fossil fuels from a reserve that had been sealed, creating another type of disturbing lake.

"It's an additional source," Walter Anthony said.

Carolyn Ruppel, who heads the gas hydrates project at the US Geological Survey, said Walter Anthony's theory makes sense. Thawing permafrost could release ancient fossil fuels in the areas where they intersect.

But more research is needed to prove that this is causing widespread emissions in the Arctic, she warned.

Nobody knows how long the seeps began to bubble or what the trigger was.

From a scientific point of view, the fact that these lakes emit methane rather than carbon dioxide has a limited advantage.

Methane hits the atmosphere with force and speed, then dissipates largely after a decade or two – far from carbon dioxide, which is less powerful but persists for centuries and even millennia. Thus, while methane hampers climate change and amplifies the immediate temperature of the planet, it does not leave the same legacy in the long run.

Meanwhile, some scientists say they do not know how bad the Arctic lakes will be for the climate or whether they will actually cause a doubling of permafrost emissions.

"This is not the final figure," said Vladimir Romanovsky, one of Walter Anthony's colleagues at the University of Alaska at Fairbanks and a prominent permafrost specialist.

At this point, it would be premature to call Esieh Lake the sign of a climate disaster. It is a strange and dramatic site, but its message remains partly veiled.

The years to come will probably reveal what is behind Esieh and whether there are many cousins ​​at the top of the world.

From here, we will also perhaps see if the great thaw of the Arctic has thwarted attempts to stop global warming.

[ad_2]
Source link