[ad_1]
The most moving moment of Brett Kavanaugh's moving testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Thursday came as Senator Lindsey Graham (R-SC) asked questions. Graham was almost taken aback by picking up the "unethical deception" which he said the Democrats are trying to pull by calling for a federal inquiry into allegations of sexual assault against the Supreme Court's candidate. He also reserved a lot of time to congratulate Kavanaugh. "Here's my understanding, if you lived a good life, people would recognize it, as the American Bar Association did," Graham said. "His integrity is absolutely undisputed."
Shortly after the conclusion of Kavanaugh's testimony, this "gold standard" of character assessment required that the candidate's vote of confirmation be postponed until the FBI could investigate Christine Blasey's allegation. Ford. "We are making this request because of the ABA's compliance with the law and the due process," ABA President Robert M. Carlson wrote in a letter to Sens Chuck. Grassley (R-IA) and Diane Feinstein (D-CA). . "The basic principles that underline the Council's constitutional obligation to advise and accept candidates for the federal judiciary require nothing less than a careful examination of accusations and facts by the FBI."
Here is the letter: pic.twitter.com/I1au9CbCWJ
– Jennifer Bendery (@jbendery) September 28, 2018
"Every nomination to the highest court of our country (as with all the others) is just too important to rush to a vote," the letter continued. "The decision to prosecute without further investigation would not only have a lasting impact on the reputation of the Senate, but would also negatively affect the great confidence the American people have in the Supreme Court. It must remain an institution that will reliably follow the law and not politics. "
The ABA is not the only organization to oppose Kavanaugh's testimony on Thursday. America MagazineThe "Jesuit Journal of Faith and Culture" went a step further and said that the nomination should be withdrawn. Georgetown Prep, the high school attended by Kavanaugh at the time of Ford's allegations, is a well-known Jesuit institution. "Dr. [Ford’s] the charges have not been thoroughly investigated or proven in accordance with a legal standard, nor have they been conclusively refuted or proven to be less than credible ", editors of the magazine. "Judge Kavanaugh continues to benefit from a legal presumption of innocence, but the standard for a Supreme Court candidate is much higher; there is no presumption of confirmation.
While we had already approved Judge Kavanaugh's appointment on the basis of his legal credentials and reputation as a committed textist, it is now clear that the candidacy should be withdrawn. Http://t.co/CXqVGkaTdY
– America Magazine (@americamag) September 28, 2018
On Friday morning, Heather Gerken, Yale Law School Dean, alma mater, wrote that "continuing the confirmation process without further investigation is not in the interest of the Court or our profession."
Dean Gerken joins ABA to request a more in-depth investigation. pic.twitter.com/SYAsVHwsi7
– Yale Law School (@YaleLawSch) September 28, 2018
It is difficult to say that Kavanaugh did not lie several times during the confirmation process, especially because he was trying to explain some of the notations made on his high school yearbook page. In questioning the candidate, Senator Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) raised the legal principle falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus. Kavanaugh did not know what that meant, so Blumenthal translated for him: false in one thing, wrong in everything. In other words, when a witness is lying about trivial trivialities, they can not be considered credible with respect to more important issues. The same principle is stated in the standard instructions given to jurors: "If you knowingly prove that a witness has testified falsely about a material issue, you have the right to be wary of the other testimony of this witness. and you can reject any testimony from that person. witness."
Senator John Kennedy (R-LA) was the last member of the Judiciary Committee to interview Kavanaugh. Like many other Republican senators, he did not give up his time to Rachel Mitchell, the prosecutor they recruited to interview Ford and Kavanaugh, and that Kennedy worried "Go catwoman" on the witnesses.
"Do you believe in God?" Kennedy asked Kavanaugh. He said yes. Kennedy then asked if the allegations of Ford, Deborah Ramirez and Julie Swetnik were true. Kavanaugh issued disjointed denials to each claim. "I'm 100% sure, senator," he said.
"Do you swear to God?" Kennedy finally asked.
"I swear to god."
This publication has been updated.
[ad_2]
Source link
