Analysts expect the iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF to reach $ 165



[ad_1]

<div _ngcontent-c14 = "" innerhtml = "

Getty

By examining the underlying holdings of the ETFs in our ETF Channel hedge universe, we compared the price of each asset against the analyst's average target price at 12 months and calculated the weighted average implied target price of the ETF Channel. the analyst for the FNB itself. For the iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF, we found that the target price implied by the ETF's analysts, based on its underlying holdings, was $ 165.15 per unit.

With IWF trading at a recent price close to $ 145.70 per unit, this means analysts are expecting a 13.35% increase for this ETF, based on analysts' average target targets for holdings. underlying. Landstar System, Silgan Holdings and Old Dominion Freight Line are three of the underlying holdings of IWF whose target prices for analysts are clearly on the rise. Although LSTR traded at a recent price of $ 103.55 / share, the average analyst target is 18.35% higher at $ 122.56 / share. Similarly, SLGN is up 16.65% from the recent share price of $ 26.06 if the average target price of $ 30.40 per analyst is achieved, and analysts expect on average that ODFL reaches a target price of $ 153.64 per share, or 16.26% recent price of $ 132.15.

Below is a summary table of current target prices for analysts:

first name symbol Recent price Avg. 12-MB analyst. Target % Upside to Target
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF IWF $ 145.70 $ 165.15 13.35%
Landstar System, Inc. LSTR $ 103.55 $ 122.56 18.35%
Silgan Holdings Inc. SLGN $ 26.06 $ 30.40 16.65%
Old Dominion, Inc. Freight Line ODFL $ 132.15 $ 153.64 16.26%

Are the analysts justified in these objectives or too optimistic as to where these securities will be traded in 12 months? Do analysts have a valid rationale for their goals or lag behind recent developments in business and industry? A high price target relative to the stock price of a stock may reflect optimism about the future, but may also be a forerunner of downward price revision if goal was a relic of the past. These are questions that require additional research from investors.

Click here to discover 10 ETFs with the most favorable objectives for analysts »

">

By examining the underlying holdings of the ETFs in our ETF Channel hedge universe, we compared the price of each asset against the analyst's average target price at 12 months and calculated the weighted average implied target price of the ETF Channel. the analyst for the FNB itself. For the iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF, we found that the target price implied by the ETF's analysts, based on its underlying holdings, was $ 165.15 per unit.

With IWF trading at a recent price close to $ 145.70 per unit, this means analysts are expecting a 13.35% increase for this ETF, based on analysts' average target targets for holdings. underlying. Landstar System, Silgan Holdings and Old Dominion Freight Line are three of the underlying holdings of IWF whose target prices for analysts are clearly on the rise. Although LSTR traded at a recent price of $ 103.55 / share, the average analyst target is 18.35% higher at $ 122.56 / share. Similarly, SLGN is up 16.65% from the recent share price of $ 26.06 if the average target price of $ 30.40 per analyst is achieved, and analysts expect on average what ODFL reaches a recent price of $ 132.15.

Below is a summary table of current target prices for analysts:

first name symbol Recent price Avg. 12-MB analyst. Target % Upside to Target
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF IWF $ 145.70 $ 165.15 13.35%
Landstar System, Inc. LSTR $ 103.55 $ 122.56 18.35%
Silgan Holdings Inc. SLGN $ 26.06 $ 30.40 16.65%
Old Dominion, Inc. Freight Line ODFL $ 132.15 $ 153.64 16.26%

Are the analysts justified in these objectives or too optimistic as to where these securities will be traded in 12 months? Do analysts have a valid rationale for their goals or lag behind recent developments in business and industry? A high price target relative to the stock price of a stock may reflect optimism about the future, but may also be a forerunner of downward price revision if goal was a relic of the past. These are questions that require additional research from investors.

Click here to discover 10 ETFs with the most favorable objectives for analysts »

[ad_2]
Source link