Bohemian Rhapsody is a big Queen Movie



[ad_1]

Warning: This article contains SPOILERS for Bohemian Rhapsody.

Bohemian Rhapsody can successfully present Queen and their sensational songs, but Freddie Mercury is not entitled to the treatment it deserves. Mr. RobotRami Malek as Freddie, along with Gwilym Lee, Queen's lead guitarist, Brian May. X-Men: Apocalypse'S' Angel, Ben Hardy, performer Roger Taylor and Joseph Mazzello plays John Deacon. Aiden Gillen, Tom Hollander, Allen Leach and Mike Myers complete Bohemian Rhapsody & # 39;The actors are part of the group, which sees the band break free from its humble beginnings and reach fame.

Indeed, there are many positives that come from a cast like this. Each is an interpreter of great talent and each of them truly embodies his respective role. By the time the highly discussed Live Aid concert arrives, it's hard not to believe they're not the real queen themselves. This is even more true for Malek, who truly channels the spirit and spirit of Freddie Mercury.

Related: The End of the Bohemian Rhapsody Saves a Bland Queen Movie

Thanks to Queen's iconic catalog, Bohemian Rhapsody presents itself as a fun visual experience of their musical prowess. But beyond their extraordinary looks, Bohemian Rhapsody can not capture what makes these particular musicians the special men they are. This is somewhat predictable, since the film has to contend with the legacy of its legendary lead singer. However, the film also manages to defeat the famous main character of Queen in many ways.

Bohemian Rhapsody is too interested in the queen


Bohemian Rhapsody begins with Freddie Mercury's preparations for the 1985 Live Aid concert, before it returns to its humble beginnings in the early 1970s. On the basis of this opening, it can be assumed that Freddie was to be the sole objective of the movie. In this scenario, Freddie may have played the part of the audience substitute, as moviegoers would discover both the music scene and the place of Mercury in this film, as well as for Queen. But this is not the case in Bohemian Rhapsody.

The film rushes quickly to Smile's first concert, and then to the full Queen's concert. From this moment, the interest of the film is that the unit creates their songs and interprets them. As a musical biopic, it's understandable; The songs are what Queen spent most of her time creating and playing. That's why they are the most famous. But the overriding interest in capturing Queen's mind is that Bohemian Rhapsody feels rather impersonal.

Related: 15 Biopics who have been hated by their subjects

This is true even with Malek's Mercury, the character with whom the audience spends the most time – and that's the heart of Bohemian RhapsodyProblems. Nobody denies that the band is composed of incredibly talented musicians. However, it is safe to say that the jewel of the group is their enigmatic flamboyant. It is clear that the filmmakers were aware of Freddie's influence. The promotional material strongly highlights Freddie Mercury, and his life is the main sub-plot of the film. But Bohemian Rhapsody seems reluctant to recognize it fully or to look for what inspired or motivated him. Conversely, the film highlights very quickly the importance of each musician for the success of Queen. For example, Brian May has a whole scene in which he explains why he invented "We Will Rock You".

In short, Rhapsod of BohemiaIn the end, you can not decide whether it's a Queen movie or a Freddie Mercury biopic. The rich and opposite stories of Mercury and Queen compete for the spotlight without getting their due. It is obvious that Brian May is a great guitarist, is very intelligent and is the most measured member of the group. But moviegoers only get together very little. The film has never deigned to show his life outside of Queen. The public does not know what kind of person they were. Why did an astrophysicist, a dentist, an electrical engineer and a migrant parsi create such good music together?

Likewise, all the personal problems of group members are geared towards maintaining the group's legacy. Indeed, it happens even when Freddie, who divulges his diagnosis to his friends, communicates with his parents and starts a new relationship the same day as their legendary performance Live Aid. This condenses Freddie's personal story and also the group's shadow and their triumph.

How Bohemian Rhapsody fails Freddie


Freddie Mercury is unique and famous for many reasons. He was a flamboyant artist, but one of the most intensely private stars of his time. Freddie had a lot of talent, but he humbly brought a lot of credit to his teammates. Plus, he was known for his acidic language, but he remained kind and generous – with his own words, "a peach"- for most of the people he has met – and his heritage and sexuality have been valued, and none of them has harmed his career in the same way as he did." would have had others.A movie could very well explore one of these qualities with striking details.

Again Bohemian Rhapsody, instead chooses to simply relay what we already know about Freddie Mercury, rather than finding the man in the legend, as many other biopics attempt. He is the Live Aid interpreter from start to finish; the public never sees what Freddie failed, what inspired him or what changed him. Scenes that develop or focus solely on her life collide with Queen's narrative, which means that her story – like Queen's – lacks this narrative and in-depth strength. In addition, a secondary plot involving Freddie and his disapproving father starts in one of the Bohemian RhapsodyFirst scenes. But this has never been developed or discussed until the end of the film.

The only reason many of these scenes hit as hard as they are is due to Malek's phenomenal performance. Malek struts and stands, he sells all the dramatic moments. The scene where Freddie confesses his orientation to his fiancée is remarkable. Malek's tortured face betrays each of Freddie's contradictory thoughts and emotions.

Fortunately, Bohemian Rhapsody does not avoid Freddie's sexuality, but the film is not a triumph of representation either. Freddie shares several intimate moments with Jim Hutton (Aaron McCusker). But their six-year relationship is mainly relegated to Bohemian Rhapsodysequence of credits. Most of the film follows rather its longstanding affiliation with Mary Austin (Lucy Boynton). It was really a relationship that was extremely important for Freddie Mercury. But with Austin in the foreground, other facets of Freddie's sexuality are set aside.


In addition, throughout the movie, there is a shift between the orientation of Queen and Freddie. When Freddie begins to kiss his hogwash in Bohemian RhapsodyHe launches a elaborate costume ball in his mansion. His friends complain that it's "not their scene"And they leave almost immediately." Hutton does not share any scenes with the band, aside from watching Live Aid, and Austin frequently meets Queen near their shows. Bohemian Rhapsody to focus on putting Freddie in context beyond his legend, unless his normative traits, ultimately, are related to Queen. It's a strange choice, especially when Freddie's brotherhood is integral to Queen's production and success. However, maybe that was to be expected, since when Bohemian Rhapsody tries to tackle Freddie's sexuality, this creates a rather dubious subtext.

This is most apparent from the description of Paul Prenter's film (Allen Leech). Prenter is certainly a controversial figure in Queen's story, especially for betraying Freddie's secrets to the media. But this openly gay character is almost caricatural and mischievous in the way he orchestrates Freddie's apparent offspring. The real Freddie often explained how much he appreciated his hedonistic lifestyle. On the other hand, Bohemian RhapsodyThe incursions into Freddie's nightlife are described somewhat differently. Although they are safe and appropriate, they are interspersed with other sequences, capturing a haggard Freddie in partial lighting situations. Instead of the chills caused by Freddie's clubbing – such as the smuggling of Princess Diana into clubs – they appear as disconcerting experiences.

The tension rises within Queen – thanks to the growing influence of Prenter and these hedonistic scenes. This does not mean that fatigue and drug use would not make these problems worse. However, Freddie is the only character who is described as participating in them. He thus positions himself as the lost crook and the member responsible for the separation of the group. This is a strange choice, since Freddie has always been described as "hysterical" by the group.great diplomat. "

In truth, the group unanimously decided to take a break at that time. In addition, Brian and Roger – and Freddie – have all tried to work solo. In Bohemian RhapsodyFreddie's desire to follow Paul and "spreads its wings"Throws them into turmoil and engenders an icy silence among the group members. As such, Freddie is punished by his digression on Queen's part. When he comes back and apologizes to the group, one could interpret that he apologizes for the entirety of his default lifestyle. Given all that we know about Freddie Mercury, it is rather doubtful that he would have been so sorry for the way he lived.

Page 2 of 3: Implication of Sacha Baron Cohen and Queen in the Bohemian Rhapsody


MCU characters least likely to appear again after Avengers 4

[ad_2]
Source link