Brett Kavanaugh said: "I was very moved," the judge writes in the Wall Street Journal

Judge Brett Kavanaugh admitted to having said certain things that he should not have during a hearing before the Senate last week, a tacit acknowledgment of questions raised about his conduct and emotions while he was seeking confirmation from the Supreme Court.

Kavanaugh made such comments in a Wall Street Journal column, claiming he would be an independent, non-partisan judge. But he did not apologize for his behavior during the hearing, in which he interrupted the senators, returned the questions on the consumption of alcohol and sowed in his introductory remarks comments on "revenge on behalf of the Clintons" and leftist groups.

His performances have been thoroughly examined, as his potential appointment to the Supreme Court is in a delicate balance.

More than 2,400 law professors from all walks of life signed a letter this week in which they claimed that Kavanaugh's lack of "judicial temperament" would be disqualifying for any court, not to mention the country's highest level. . A former Supreme Court justice, John Paul Stevens, also spoke, stating that Kavanaugh's hearing was disqualifying at an event on Thursday, according to the Palm Beach Post.

And when Senator Heidi Heitkamp of North Dakota – a democrat from a red state who voted for the nomination of President Trump's first candidate, Judge Neil M. Gorsuch, at court – announced that she had decided not to support Kavanaugh On Thursday, she also spoke about Kavanaugh's "temperament, honesty, and impartiality," which is central to her concerns.

[‘Unfathomable’: More than 2,400 law professors sign letter opposing Kavanaugh’s confirmation]

"I was very emotional last Thursday, more than I have ever been. I might have been sometimes too emotional, "wrote Kavanaugh. "I know my tone was sharp, and I said a few things that I should not have said."

Despite the conciliation process, Kavanaugh continued to deplore the treatment inflicted on him, criticizing the charges against him as "unjustified and sometimes vicious allegations".

"My time at high school and college more than 30 years ago was ridiculously distorted. My wife and daughters faced vile and violent threats, "he wrote. "My statement and my responses also reflected my deep distress at the unfairness of the manner in which this allegation was handled."

[Analysis: Brett Kavanaugh just admitted he screwed up]

Critics quickly grasped what they saw as a discrepancy between the sentiments expressed in the column and those posted at the hearing.

"Your shameful and deliberately polarizing performance in this audience room was in total contradiction with the sweet reason expressed in this editorial," professor of journalism at the NYU Jay Rosen wrote on Twitter.

"It's too late for that, Judge Kavanaugh," Democratic Senator Chris Murphy wrote on Twitter. "You told us that there is a vast Liberal conspiracy, led by Dem Senators, organizing false accusations against you. It's crazy. You threatened us that 'what is happening is going around'. This is unacceptable. "

Kavanaugh said in the column that he believed the Supreme Court should "never be considered a partisan institution."

"The judges are not sitting on either side of an alley," he wrote. "As I have said many times, if I have been confirmed by the court, I would be part of a team of nine people determined to settle cases in accordance with the Constitution and the laws of the United States. I would always strive to be a team player. "

Read more:

Mark Judge's exhausted memories were very expensive. Now you can get 'Wasted' for free.

Facebook blocked many gay-themed ads as part of its new advertising policy, angering LGBT groups

Art of the Deal author says New York Times ends Trump myth as "self-made man"