[ad_1]
This year marks the 30th anniversary of the beginning of the panic "global warming" (now known as "climate change")
As noted by the Wall Street Journal On June 23, 1988, NASA scientist James E. Hansen testified before the Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources and affirmed a "high degree of confidence" in "a cause-and-effect relationship between the greenhouse effect and the observed warming "
. global importance, should be rigorously examined to see if they have come true. In the case of Hansen, it is obvious that they did not do it.
Hansen proposed three possible scenarios. We would see the temperature of the Earth increase by 1 degree Celsius here this year; the second would see a 0.7% increase in temperature and the third a smaller increase that would stabilize in 2000.
The third scenario was the most accurate. Hansen has made many other predictions, including stronger hurricanes related to global surface temperatures. "The list of what has not happened," notes the Journal, "is long and tedious," adding, "… it's time to acknowledge that the rapid warming that he predicted is not Climate researchers and policymakers should adopt the most modest forecasts that are consistent with the observed temperatures. "
This is not going to happen, because, as for immigration reform Most politicians prefer the solution
Richard Siegmund Lindzen is an American atmospheric physicist known for his work on atmospheric dynamics, atmospheric tides and the photochemistry of ozone. posted on wattsupwiththat.com, the website on global warming and climate change, Lindzen says:
"Proponents of climate hysteria, mostly unscientific, realize that modern industrial society. So they are trying to say that we are seeing the problems right now. Of course, the warming that has occurred over the last 200 years has been too small to have been a major factor. However, objective reality is of little importance when it comes to propaganda – where repetition can actually counter reality.
Repetition is precisely what we experience in the mainstream media, which selectively interviewed people who promote the myth of climate change. These include politicians who see this as another way to regulate and dominate our lives.
As if to confirm, climatedepot.com notes: "NBC News is apologizing for a report that meteorologists support George Mason and Climate Central." Climate information promoted by meteorologists activists is highly suspicious and the groups behind the effort have supported stopping any scientific debate by supporting the RICO statutes against skeptics and they have "
When the hype calms down, the facts are catching up. In 2015, the UK's Daily Telegraph reported: "Two events last week have brought other twists to one of the longest jokes of our modern world. One of them was the revelation by the European Space Agency that in 2013 and 2014, after years in which the volume of Arctic ice had decreased, it has still increased by 33%. The other was that Canadian scientists studying the effects of climate change on the Arctic ice of an icebreaker had to suspend their research when their ship was called in with the help of other booby traps. in the thickest summer ice of Hudson Bay for 20 years.
Many apocalyptic predictions of an imminent end of the world because of "climate change" have proven to be false. Their goal of a big government depriving us of more of our freedoms and spending billions of dollars for an invented problem was exposed
We can and should recycle and not pollute the atmosphere, l & # 39; water or the earth. lower the temperature of the Earth
[ad_2]
Source link
