China angry at "wrongful accusations" and "defamation" in speech on pence


[ad_1]

Chinese Foreign Minister Friday criticized US Vice President Mike Pence for a speech on Thursday night accusing the Chinese of stealing technology, co-opting US technology companies into censorship campaigns and interfering with American politics.

penny speaking Thursday, at the Hudson Institute, accusing China of "continuing a comprehensive and coordinated campaign to undermine support for the president, our agenda and the most valuable ideals of our country."

penny called Google ends the development of a user-friendly system for monitoring search engine called "Dragonfly", which he believes would strengthen the censorship of the Communist Party and compromise the privacy of Chinese customers. "

He also advised US tech companies to avoid doing business with China "if it was to give up their intellectual property or endorse the oppression of Beijing."

The Chinese Foreign Ministry strongly opposed each of the key elements of Pence's speech.

"The speech in question made unjustified accusations against China's domestic and foreign policy and slandered China by saying that China was meddling in domestic affairs and elections in the United States. It is nothing more than talking about hearsay, confusing good and bad and creating something out of nothing, "said the spokesman for the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. foreign, Hua Chunying m said Friday.

"It is very ridiculous for the US side to stigmatize its usual exchanges and cooperation with China as China immerses itself in its internal affairs and elections," she added. "The international community already knows very well who voluntarily encroaches on the sovereignty of others, ingests in the internal affairs of others and harms its interests."

"We urge the US side to correct its wrongdoing, to stop accusing and baselessly slandering China and harming the interests of China and China-US. and take concrete steps to maintain the steady and steady development of China and the United States. relations, "Hua concluded.

the New York Times On Friday, China was stunned by the "magnitude of the alleged infractions" in Pence's speech and by its pugnacious attitude "we will not remain inactive".

In fact, the Time Pence's remarks are nothing less than the beginning of a new Cold War, which would place it on the same historical shelf as that of Sir Winston Churchill.Iron Curtain"Speech at the beginning of the Cold War with the Soviet Union. Remarks to a think-tank would not be a bad place for such a discourse; Churchill was speaking at Westminster College in Missouri when he pronounced his. Some highly censored social media commentators in China have explicitly compared Pence's speech to that of Churchill, but without complementarity.

American Democrats eager to thwart the old Cold War against Russia since Hillary Clinton's defeat in 2016 were not happy to see Pence focus more on Chinese electoral interference.

"The vice president tried to move the examination of Russian public opinion towards China. He claimed that Russia's efforts to interfere in the US electoral process "are derisory compared to what China is doing," complained Ryan Hass, former head of the Obama administration, now a member of the Brookings Institution. New York Times.

Beijing will be pleased to see the Washington Post Last Friday, Pence was criticized for his "complicity in downplaying Russian interference in the elections" and for accusing Trump White House of having made complaints against China to divert the attention of the seemingly endless investigation into the alleged Russian interference in 2016.

the To post The Trump government may be sitting on information regarding Chinese efforts of influence that it has not yet shared with the public and acknowledged that China "was using campaigning". aggressive influence "farms and social media publications in 2016.

There is an interesting discussion about the degree of influence that authoritarian foreign governments should be able to buy in democratic societies, and the possibility of preventing them from aligning themselves with the principles of freedom of expression. or even to prevent them. possible to stop them in the era of global online media. the L.A. Times addressed this discussion on Thursday:

"China is often trying to get its message across. And for some, it's the interference in American politics. But for others, it is simply China that expresses its point of view, "said David Bachman, a researcher in China at the University of Washington in Seattle.

Pence described China's actions as a "global and coordinated campaign," saying "Beijing uses a whole-of-government approach, using political, economic and military tools, as well as propaganda, to increase its influence and promote its interests. . United States."

Bachman said that it seemed that Pence's speech announced "a whole-of-government response from the United States, so it looks like the relationship will continue to deteriorate."

An important difference between Churchill's Iron Curtain speech and Pence's remarks Thursday is that he hoped the new Cold War could still be avoided. "We will only stop if our relations with China are based on fairness, reciprocity and respect for our sovereignty," he said.

China insists that it wants all these things too and resists accusations. There is still room for negotiation between the two major powers of the modern world, but the number of transactions is falling rapidly.

[ad_2]Source link