[ad_1]
Although the Chinese media have tried to portray Chinese Communist Party leader Xi Jinping's meeting with US Secretary of Defense Jim Mattis as polite and productive, the condescending tone of his cover portrays Xi Jinping. quietly.
The really interesting aspect of the secretary's visit is that his own office did not tell us much about what he told Xi
Admittedly, Mattis argued He had open-minded and open ears before leaving for China, but he also said that he was going to Beijing for a "conversation". Little has been reported so far about his side of this conversation. run Xinhua at length quoted Xi's comments summarizing Mattis' response as a general desire to work more closely with the Chinese army:
"When we see common interests between China and the United States, we "Our position is firm and unequivocal with respect to the sovereignty and territorial integrity of China," Xi said, adding that "every inch of territory passed down by the ancestors may not be lost while we were Mr. Xi said that military relations had maintained a solid development momentum in recent years.
"It's been known for a long time that true military experts do not want to." Xi emphasized that enhanced military exchanges and institutional construction at various levels are useful in defusing doubts and preventing misunderstandings, miscalculation and misunderstanding.
Xi said he hoped that both the armed forces will strengthen communication, enhance mutual trust, deepen cooperation, manage and control risks and promote military relations to stabilize bilateral relations.
Global Times also quoted analysts who extolled Xi's capital remarks had very little to say about the defense secretary's response:
"There are some questions regarding sovereignty and the The territorial integrity of China, which has become increasingly tense because of the American movements, like the problems of the South China Sea and the Taiwan issue. "So, through the meeting, China sends a warning to the United States reaffirming its results," said Diao Daming, an expert in American studies and associate professor at Renmin University of China.
Mattis heard China's most authoritative voice on these issues and questions, and this could indicate that China's legitimate activities in areas such as the South China Sea and the Taiwan Strait will not be affected by US military actions, said Xu Guangyu He thanked Mr. Xi for meeting him and said that the United States highly valued the military ties with China, and that the United States was willing to strengthen strategic communication, expand win-win cooperation, control and manage differences and risks, and avoid conflict and confrontation with China, reported CCTV.
A similar approach was taken for Mattis' meeting with Chinese Defen. Minister Wei Fenghe, who quoted China's positions on the South China Sea, Taiwan and Korea by Global Times, while Mattis did not react, was transcribed
]. Reprimand the Chinese newspapers for trivializing Mattis when the official statement of the Defense Department says even less about the words of the secretary than Xinhua:
On June 27, 2018, in separate meetings in Beijing, Secretary of Defense James N. Mattis with Chinese President Xi Jinping, Politburo Member Yang Jiechi and the Minister of National Defense, General Wei Fenghe.
Secretary Mattis reaffirmed the importance of strategic transparency in defense relations between China and the United States. The leaders discussed a wide range of defense issues and reaffirmed the importance of the complete, verifiable and irreversible denuclearization of North Korea.
Mattis is laconic, but not timid, and he recently developed a very strong critical to the Chinese militarization of the South China Sea. The day after his meeting with Xi, Mattis made the headlines in Seoul promising that the US troops' engagement in South Korea was "ruthless". It is remarkable that the DoD allows Xi to capture all the headlines. everything Mattis told him. This also gives the impression that the meeting was a little more abrupt than anyone in Beijing or Washington would like to admit.
[ad_2]
Source link
