[ad_1]
Flyers Rights was also a leading supporter of the F.A.A. to adjust the size of the economy seat. But Mr. Hudson seemed concerned about the possible results of the study.
"We hope it will go in one direction, but we are cautiously wondering if this will lead to where it is now," he said in an interview. Even though the A.A.A. finally decided to leave more room for passengers, he said. It could take a long time before most travelers see a change. "There is a story with F.A.A. delay settlements, grandfathering regulations or grant exemptions or exemptions. "
Henry Harteveldt, founder of the Atmospheric Research Group, a San Francisco-based tourism industry analytics firm, said he, too, was not expecting a lot of money. ;improvement. "Although I would personally like to see more legroom in the economy, as an analyst, I recognize that airlines will be turning around and saying that the flights will cost more expensive, "he said. "Be prepared to pay more for your ticket."
He noted that the legislation provides for "a minimum rest period for flight attendants for the first time, which will enhance safety".
Harteveldt and Engel both stated that some of the most important aspects of the bill were issues that Congress refused to deal with.
"Because airlines have been successful in lobbying for the bill to include regulations on baggage and ticket change fees, this has been removed," said Harteveldt, noting that passengers had hoped for possible regulation or the elimination of certain ancillary costs.
According to Mr Engel, the Congress has chosen to tackle a major problem.
"Once again, the United States is refusing to turn the CAF into capital," he said, explaining that other countries had managed to privatize air traffic control. These companies can then plan their finances over longer periods, making air traffic control systems more stable and adaptable. "This is particularly disappointing because it was really a stated goal of the Trump administration."
Source link
