Conservatives fear Trump cuts agreement on immigration



[ad_1]

Conservatives fear more and more President TrumpDonald John TrumpThe five takeaways of Cruz, the debate between O & # 39; Rourke and Arpaio sues defamation against New York Times Christine Lagarde IMF delays her trip to the Middle East MORE and the GOP leaders will conclude a lean immigration deal during the lame session if Democrats reconquer the House in November.

Republicans fear that Trump, who loves the role of negotiator, wants to protect hundreds of thousands of so-called dreamers in exchange for a $ 25 billion wall, and that he could do it without getting any money. Other concessions from Democrats if he thinks it's his last chance to get funding for the wall.

But a possible agreement on the burning issue of immigration was broken in June and it is extremely unlikely that immigration supporters such as White House senior advisor Stephen Miller will support legislation that allows Dreamers to accept the wall.

Nevertheless, as the Conservatives start considering the possibility of becoming the minority party next year, they are launching outbreaks on the possibility of a wall-for-dreamers agreement and warn it could turn against the GOP basis.

"Personally, I would oppose this agreement, but it would not surprise me to see some kind of wall, a DACA agreement," said Representative Andy Biggs (R-Ariz.), Member of the Independent Caucus freedom of the House, referring to the Deferred Action Program for Child Arrivals. "It's hard for me to imagine that he'll play well with the base."

A GOP assistant said that one of the concerns was that retired legislators could enter into an immigration deal.

"If we lose the House, many retired members will be tempted to buy the wall with an amnesty gift, and we can not let that happen," said the assistant. "The reason Americans want a wall is precisely because they want to end illegal immigration and not encourage it."

The fact that some Republican lawmakers are already starting to issue the idea of ​​an immigration agreement that only finances the wall and offers legal protection to the recipients of the DACA, which protects from the expulsion of young immigrants, nicknamed Dreamers, also fueled the GOP's fears. country illegally as children.

Trump announced last year that he was terminating the DACA, although the courts temporarily prevented the president from canceling the Obama era program while cases were in front of him. the judicial system.

"I would like to make a deal: full funding for DACA", Sen. Lindsey GrahamLindsey Olin GrahamSaudi: mysterious mystery that dissociates a journalist linked to the Saudi Crown Prince from the disappearance of a journalist: a report Defense of Night: Trump fears that Saudi Arabia is guilty until proven guilty Innocence | McConnell opens the door to sanctions | The joint presidency of the heads of state will meet his Saudi counterpart | Mattis says Trump supports him "100 percent" MORE (R-S.C.), One of Trump's allies at Capitol Hill, told Fox News on Tuesday.

When asked if cutbacks in legal immigration should also be addressed in an agreement, Graham responded.

"Keep it simple," he said.

The White House has opened up new prospects for Democrats to work together next year on some of Trump's fundamental election promises, such as infrastructure and drug pricing, a tactical shift. which might prove necessary to secure major legislative victories if Republicans lose their majority in the country. House in the mid-term elections.

Building the wall along the US-Mexico border is a campaign promise that Trump has been eager to fill, but Congress has yet to deliver the $ 25 billion the president is seeking for construction. Two Republican – sponsored immigration bills, including wall – to – wall funding, were not passed in the House this summer.

The White House has identified four pillars that they believe should be included in any immigration framework: strengthening border security, including a border wall; a permanent solution for DACA; new limits to family migration and elimination of the visa lottery program for diversity.

But some uncompromising immigration fear that Trump, who has already hesitated on some of his immigration positions, will be willing to finish with some of those pillars he wants to get the full funding from his wall, especially if Democrats are ready to take power. the house for the next two years.

"[The wall] is the biggest symbol of Trump. It's something he really wants, "said Chris Chmielenski, deputy director of NumbersUSA, a group that supports the reduction of immigration. "And this is our biggest fear, is that he gives up the amnesty to get a border wall."

"He could lose some support from Trump's relentless about it," said Chmielenski.

The Congress is preparing for a confrontation between the duck and the lame duck. Government funding will expire on December 7 for the Department of Homeland Security, which is responsible for the border.

Leaders of the House of Representatives of the House of Representatives said they were willing to tackle the problem, but the majority leader in the Senate Mitch McConnellAddison (Mitch) Mitchell McConnellGraham: I hope Dems will have the brisk fire for his driving around Kavanaugh A Saudi mystery creates a gap between Trump and GOP Overnight Defense: Trump fears that Saudi Arabia will be guilty up until With proof of innocence | McConnell opens the door to sanctions | The joint presidency of the heads of state will meet his Saudi counterpart | Mattis says Trump supports him "100 percent" MORE (R-Ky.) Scrambled the discussions on a government stop on the wall.

"We did not talk about shutting down the government, we talked about getting wall funding for a year," McConnell told Bloomberg News on Tuesday. "The President and I want to do it."

One way to secure wall funding without stopping the government is to reach an agreement on immigration with the Democrats. While such an agreement remains elusive, it may be easier to get rid of beef-duck when legislators no longer feel the pressure of an election that threatens them.

Leader of the Senate Minority Charles SchumerCharles (Chuck) Ellis Schumer McConnell states that deficits are not a Republican problem "Medicare for All is a disaster for the elderly and American taxpayers. A race in the Senate Dems to save Menendez in the deep blue New Jersey SUI (D-N.Y.) Last week opened the door to a possible agreement by saying that Democrats are not opposed to strengthening the US border.

"We Democrats believe in strengthened border security," he said, noting that the Senate's 2013 Democrat-supported Senate Reform Bill provided for billions of dollars in funding. dollars for border security. "We will continue to fight for the strongest and most stringent border security."

Some doubt, however, that an immigration agreement is possible. Democrats will be reluctant to give Trump a major victory by 2020, when the adoption of a DACA against wall bill would provoke a violent reaction among conservatives and opponents of immigration.

House Republicans will also monitor closely to see how the leader of the majority Kevin McCarthyKevin Owen McCarthyThe swing district democrats have advised to avoid talking about immigration. The Hill & # 39; s Morning – Presented by the Coalition for Affordable Prescription Drugs – Trump travels to Florida ravaged by hurricane, Georgia McCarthy, brother-in-law under review American Identity Claim (R-Calif.), Which rivals the outgoing president Paul RyanPaul Davis RyanSaudi: a mystery that slams between Trump and the GOP group The GOP group plays late in the siege of Iowa, once considered lost. Adelsons donated M in September to help the GOP group mid-term. MORE (R-Wis.) As a Republican in the Supreme House, manages the fight against the wall of the border.

"If Ryan thinks something is going to hurt McCarthy, maybe he'll just go over another [continuing resolution]especially if the Republicans are able to hang on to the House and refer this issue to the next congress, "said Chmielenski.

On the other hand, if the GOP loses control of the House, Ryan may want to give way to his successor, Chmielenski added.

"He could be seen to be pushing hard and pushing for an immigration bill that would allow more Democrats to move to 218," he said, referring to the number of votes needed to pass a bill. law in the House.

Even if Trump and Congress agreed to deal only with these two pillars, they would still need to resolve major issues, such as the proportion of the population covered by the DACA and the question of whether to provide them with access to citizenship.

However, it is possible that a decision on DACA would be made by a federal judge in Texas before the end of the year, which could further prompt Congress to take action. If the courts end up on the side of the administration, the Democrats may be those who want to conclude an agreement on immigration with the Republicans.

"The day [Trump] wins in court, what are we going to do with these young people? Graham asked.

Jordan Fabian, Mike Lillis and Alexander Bolton contributed

[ad_2]
Source link