[ad_1]
In both cases, however, the reason for Bannon's backlash is quite simple: worldwide, he is widely regarded as a populist ideologue with links to white nationalists and neo-Nazis who have propelled his own policy in Washington. – a feat Bannon is now trying to reproduce in Europe. In the hours of New YorkerThe announcement of several of its high-level participants warned that if Bannon were present, they would not be. The director Judd Apatow said in a tweet that he "would not participate in an event that normalizes hatred". Other participants, including Jimmy Fallon, Jim Carrey, Patton Oswalt, and Bo Burnham followed around the same time, L & # 39; economist began to face his own threats of abandonment, including from the writer Laurie Penny and activists Blair Imani and Ally Fogg.
Steve Bannon and Colin Kaepernick share little in common, but the backlash of each is rooted in a common anger
Remnick, in his statement for New Yorker, insisted that Bannon's invitation did not constitute an elevation or approval of his opinions a lot of critics have suggested, and that Bannon remains a media figure as an architect of Trumpism. "By doing an interview with one of the main creators and organizers of Trumpism, we do not take it out of the dark," wrote Remnick. He added: "The purpose of an interview, a rigorous interview, especially in a case like this, is to put pressure on the views of the interviewee." Minton Beddoes, in his statement for L & # 39; economist, offered a similar justification. "The future of open societies will not be ensured by like-minded people talking to one another in an echo chamber, but by submitting ideas and individuals from all sides to rigorous questions and debates.
The question has already emerged for media organizations on both sides of the Atlantic. In the United States, political commentator Bill Maher has fueled controversy for his decision to interview an old Breitbart editor Milo Yiannopoulos in his show. In Britain, the BBC Today & # 39; hui program has faced negative reactions to give the air time to the old Breitbart London publisher and ally of Bannon Raheem Kassam.
And he appeared for the case of Bannon himself. In Great Britain, the Financial Times hosted Bannon at the "Future of News" event last March, where he was interviewed by the newspaper's editor, Lionel Barber. In a reflection in favor of this decision, Barber wrote: "In nearly 40 years, in journalism, I interviewed many people of questionable character. … At no time did I apply a policy test to potential candidates. That would never have seemed to me. But these are extraordinary moments, when polarization has reached new heights and liberal democracy itself seems to be under siege ".
New Yorker finally ended up in a different place, despite the departure of similar principles. Remnick concluded his statement by noting that the New Yorker Festival was "a different type of forum," for example an investigative article or a profile, especially because the speakers receive a fee "which does not happen not for an article or for the radio.
[ad_2]
Source link
