Could the 2018 Rams match the 2000 champions?



[ad_1]

<p class = "canvas-atom canvas-text Mb (1.0em) Mb (0) – sm Mt (0.8em) – sm" type = "text" content = "Welcome to Yahoo Mail NFL Mailbag, where we answer your questions sent via Twitter, Facebook, email, and scream in the void. Today our teams have been talking to the Rams, Chiefs, Packers and Jaguars. Ride!"data-reactid =" 16 ">Welcome to Yahoo Mail NFL Mailbag, where we answer your questions sent via Twitter, Facebook, email, and scream in the void. Today our teams have been talking to the Rams, Chiefs, Packers and Jaguars. Ride!

<p class = "canvas-atom canvas-text Mb (1.0em) Mb (0) – sm Mt (0.8em) – sm" type = "text" content = "Could the Rams 2018 be as good as the Rams from the "Greatest Show On Turf"?
-Thomas, via Facebook"data-reactid =" 17 ">Could the Rams 2018 be as good as the Rams from the "Greatest Show On Turf"?
-Thomas, via Facebook

Oh man, I hope so. These millennial Rams were among the funniest, most messy, and most animated teams in video games in the history of the NFL. (Except: I'm as excited about the Rams vs Chiefs in the 11th week as I've been for any regular season game for a long time.)

Could Todd Gurley and the 2018 Rams Equalize Their Counterparts in the 2000 Era? (Getty)

But how do Rams Goff-Gurley match their counterparts from two decades past? Surprisingly good. For example, the rams of 1999 and 2000 totaled 526 and 540 points, respectively; the 2018 Ram, through seven games, are on the same pace as 537. The Ram 2000 totaled 7,335 yards; The current crew is at 7124. The 2000 Rams had 63 touchdowns; the Ram 2018 are on the pace for 57.

In fact, it shows how much these GSOT Rams were ahead of the curve. We all know that offensive stratagems, penalty structures and offensive protections opened fire and offended the stratosphere. The fact that one of the most explosive teams today is about to be at the height of the GSOT marks is a testament to the crew's amazement. Here is more about this crew:

Plus, turf is hell on your lap and it's probably best to leave that in the past.

<p class = "canvas-atom canvas-text Mb (1.0em) Mb (0) – sm Mt (0.8em) – sm" type = "text" content = "Will the Chiefs burn another regular season before losing again in the first round of the playoffs?
-Rob, via Facebook"data-reactid =" 46 ">Will the Chiefs burn another regular season before losing again in the first round of the playoffs?
-Rob, via Facebook

Yeah, you write the story that will bring the strength of the locomotive when we are in December. Can the Chiefs do it in the playoffs, or will they continue to be the Los Angeles Dodgers … minus appearances in the championship game?

Andy Reid, who is in his sixth season as the Chiefs coach, has played in the playoffs four times out of five. (The fifth, 2015, the Chiefs ended the match with a 1 to 4 gap between Thanksgiving and Christmas.) And in those four playoff games, the Chiefs won exactly one game: the Texans after the 2015 season. yes, the past is not really encouraging for the leaders.

But! There is hope. It's a team that can cut you off in five different directions. Neutralize the game running, and Tyreek Hill will only run you 75 km. Grab Hill and Kareem Hunt will throw a bowling ball in your line. And in the middle of all this is Patrick Mahomes, who looks nothing like a guy in his first year as a star.

We will learn a lot more about the Chiefs by the playoffs. But all indications are that they have become overloaded to the point of having an appointment with the Super Bowl. What could go wrong with this prediction, huh?

<p class = "canvas-atom canvas-text Mb (1.0em) Mb (0) – sm Mt (0.8em) – sm" type = "text" content = "Commercial break!"data-reactid =" 51 ">Commercial break!

This mid-70s Xerox ad is just a 90-second, 90-second beauty, with a hysterical premise: the players on the field have the right game in front of them! Do not laugh, it will be the Giants next week. And they will lose again.

<p class = "canvas-atom canvas-text Mb (1.0em) Mb (0) – sm Mt (0.8em) – sm" type = "text" content = "Where are all the Jaguar fans who said that Bortles was good to go after starting 2-0? * crickets *
-Burger King Trump, via comments"data-reactid =" 55 ">Where are all the Jaguar fans who said that Bortles was good to go after starting 2-0? * crickets *
-Burger King Trump, via comments

Has anyone really said that? I mean, yes, the Jaguars looked really good last season, good enough to beat maybe almost the Patriots, but still – Blake Bortles is Blake Bortles. The best you can hope for with him is that he is a quarterback cipherer, a net zero who does nothing bad enough to actively harm his team while the defense is only biting the opposition. Unfortunately, this is not the case this year, and as we have seen unlike the Atlanta Falcons, a good defense is not enough to overcome a terrible offense.

We can now legitimately start saying that the games must "win" and that this weekend's Merrie Olde England clash between Jacksonville and Philly qualifies for both teams. I think Philly will launch and Jacksonville will "lose" Bortles at customs.

<p class = "canvas-atom canvas-text Mb (1.0em) Mb (0) – sm Mt (0.8em) – sm" type = "text" content = "Will the week off help the Packers to master and play well in both halves of a match?
-Stuart, via Facebook"data-reactid =" 62 ">Will the week off help the Packers to master and play well in both halves of a match?
-Stuart, via Facebook

Well, the Rams, New England and Minnesota will arrive in the next five weeks, and that's not really the recipe for success. What's interesting is that the Packers rank fourth for total distance, but only 16 points per game, which is a crude but effective way to say they run a lot on the pitch. In addition, they are ranked 15th in the middle of the field, so it's not like they're being thrown off the battlefield in defense. Still, this team currently holds the sixth and final playoff spot, so if the season ended today – which probably will not be, but you never know – they would still be in the playoffs.

<p class = "canvas-atom canvas-text Mb (1.0em) Mb (0) – sm Mt (0.8em) – sm" type = "text" content = "It'll do it for this week. We want your questions! Contact us by email at [email protected], on Twitter using the hashtag #AskYahooNFL, on Facebook here, or in the comments below. See you next week!"data-reactid =" 64 ">It'll do it for this week. We want your questions! Contact us by email at [email protected], on Twitter using the hashtag #AskYahooNFL, on Facebook here, or in the comments below. See you next week!

<p class = "canvas-atom canvas-text Mb (1.0em) Mb (0) – sm Mt (0.8em) – sm" type = "text" content = "
____
Jay Busbee is a writer for Yahoo Sports. Contact him at [email protected] or find him on Twitter or on Facebook. "data-reactid =" 73 ">
____
Jay Busbee is a writer for Yahoo Sports. Contact him at [email protected] or find him on Twitter or on Facebook.

<p class = "canvas-atom canvas-text Mb (1.0em) Mb (0) – sm Mt (0.8em) – sm" type = "text" content = "More from Yahoo Sports:
• The Red Sox snub the old star before the series
• Tim Brown: The Dodgers are headed back to disappointment?
• Curry loses 51 points in just 3 quarters
• Jeff Passan: The 15 minutes that were able to swing the World Series
"data-reactid =" 74 ">More from Yahoo Sports:
• The Red Sox snub the old star before the series
• Tim Brown: The Dodgers are headed back to disappointment?
• Curry loses 51 points in just 3 quarters
• Jeff Passan: The 15 minutes that were able to swing the World Series

[ad_2]
Source link