[ad_1]
How much of the talk around Tesla is today? Can a reporter criticize the company without being called a shorts or a pawn for Big Oil? Can they write something positive without being named a member of Elon Musk's cult? Obviously not on both points, if you are Dan Neil of the Wall Street Journal, who apparently suppressed his personal Twitter account after suffering a blowback from a Tesla Model 3 exam.
On Friday, The WSJ has published the review of Neil Model Tesla Model 3 Dual Motor Performance. The exam was short – more a first test drive than a full exam – but a largely glowing take on the hottest 3 model so far. For Neil's credit, he also kept things in balance by pointing out some flaws in Tesla's facade. It's possible to have mixed feelings about Tesla, after all, and Neil is nothing if it's not professional.
The review was widely circulated by Tesla critics and lovers, and it did not take long for the @ Before the account was removed, some screenshots were taken by the Tire Meets Road website:
of his Friday and Saturday defending his admiration for the new Tesla on social media against the likes of vocal critics as capital manager Mark Spiegel and hedge fund manager Montana Skeptic among others. [19659003] A small handful of Twitter users sent a barrage of charges in his own way, including statements that Dan owns shares in Tesla and was trying to manipulate his price, and that 's not a big deal. he deliberately refused to drive the new electric Jaguar I-Pace. Musk
The 2019 I-Pace Jaguar Does not Punish You for Wanting an Electric Vehicle
The 2019 I-Pace Jaguar is a real feat. While the entire auto industry is jostling …
Read More
Neil is not the kind of person to turn away from a controversial subject, and he is certainly eloquent enough to confront the "haters" and skeptics with clever words. Perhaps in order to silence his smart phone every 10 seconds, or perhaps because the level of harassment he was suffering was too important for him, Neil chose the nuclear option and removed his twitter account.
We contacted Neil for a comment by e-mail and we will update him if we have news.
I can not say that I blame him for resigning. Twitter is a hell of a good day, especially if you work in the media, and even more so if you cross the path with the Tesla cult or its most categorical critics. (Although Musk's Twitter crowd definitely saves the worst vitriol for women journalists.)
The subject of Tesla can be pretty hot, with one side of the argument seeming to dominate Elon Musk as their new god, and the other condemning all the business – and sometimes even electric vehicles in general – account for. Those who worship at the Musk Temple call any negative press the work of people who want to bypass their stock. Those who actively want to see Tesla fail see all positive as shilling. Even though a lot of critics about the company are worthwhile, just as the fact that cars are usually pretty impressive to drive, there is apparently no hint at one. or the other argument, and no one wants to fall in the middle. Bull or Bear, you have to choose one side, according to them.
Some of Neil's most vehement critics on this subject, including the handful who tweeted several times in his mentions over the past two days, seem to have been announced. his abandonment of the social media platform as a victory.
I would implore everyone here to try to hear better online, but as I know it will not happen, maybe we should delete Twitter. This could be the best option.
[ad_2]
Source link
