[ad_1]
In their final version, signed by DCCC President Ben Ray Luján, Democrats said they "would never use any known stolen pirated information, or promote or distribute pirated articles stolen from the press, whatever 'is the source. candidates will not use stolen documents, even if journalists choose to cover them in the run-up to the midterms. The NRCC was not satisfied with this, said the NRCC official, and wanted instead to make a "broader remark about the coverage of pirated materials in a responsible manner". The press had to wonder if it was an agent of Russian propaganda in 2016 in its decision to publish articles based on documents stolen by Russian hackers and published by WikiLeaks. But it is unclear how the impact of this commitment, to the detriment of a broader commitment to not engage in press reports, would have an impact on the campaign committee's handling of stolen material.
NRC was also upset, it is said, by the pressure Democrats exerted on the committee to commit itself by the end of the week. Republicans said they had never received a draft of the pledge and considered the deadlines "arbitrary". They were also frustrated by what they saw as the "constant threat of the press to present to the press" with the Republicans. "It broke our trust and made it clear that they were using this as a PR maneuver and that they were trying to block us," said the NRC official. But with the election in less than 60 days, and the hacking attempts having already been announced, the DCCC felt a sense of urgency, said a spokesman for the DCCC. "Luján was patient and gave CNRR three months to join the DCCC's stance not to use pirated material stolen from political campaigns. If, by "threats", they refer to Luján, pushing "NRC President Steve Stivers" several times, to finalize and publish a joint agreement for the good of the country, then their apologies are in the making. 39; weaken. challenged the assertion that they had never proposed to the Republicans a bill to work on, citing at least four separate occasions when Lujan and Stivers had negotiated the pledge between July 17 and 5 September. DCCC on 4 September with the proposed revisions, but noted that the project arrived after Lujan told the the Wall Street newspaper that they were approaching a market.)
Republicans "do not look for pirated materials. We do not want any pirated material. We have no intention of using pirated materials, "said the NRC official. "We do not need a commitment to do what we planned to do already." But the committee still does not know how to react if a Republican candidate in the House sees himself sending an email or text hacked by an opponent formulates his own guidelines regarding the use of pirated materials in the countryside. The problem is not unprecedented: NRC used a pirated document in an ad attacking Florida Democratic candidate Randy Perkins in 2016, after Russian hackers infiltrated the servers of the Democratic Committee of Congress and compromised candidates in nearly a dozen states. And it's not just the democrats who are vulnerable: Russian hackers got "limited" access to RNC's IT systems in 2016, said former FBI director James Comey last year.
Source link
