Does' Fantastic Beasts 2 & # 39; will twist fans of anger?



[ad_1]

A revelation 'Crimes of Grindelwald & # 39; could delight (or irritate) the longtime fans of the franchise "Harry Potter".

[Cettehistoirecontientdesspoilersmineurspour[Thisstorycontainsminorspoilersfor[Cettehistoirecontientdesspoilersmineurspour[ThisstorycontainsminorspoilersforFantastic Beasts: The Grindelwald Crimes]

This weekend sees the release of Fantastic Beasts: The Grindelwald Crimes, the second by J.K. Rowling and the director David Yates in five parts Fantastic beasts series. While the first film offered a relatively simple plot about Newt Scamander (Eddie Redmayne) and a host of new characters in Rowling's life Wizarding WorldUntil the third act at least, this second part tells the story of Rowling's universe and is inspired by Dumbledore's (Jude Law) fight against Grindelwald (Johnny Depp) – a story briefly highlighted in the Harry Potter series. The crimes of Grindelwald is sprawling, so to speak, in a way, and is openly concerned with family names, family trees, political affiliations, and birthrights. This is not new for those who have been invested in the Harry Potter books over the last 21 years, but for those who are attracted to the franchise because of the sharpness of the plot lines and the structure of the Harry Potter movies in which non-readers were welcome, The crimes of Grindelwald ask to see your reference documents at the door.

the Harry Potter cinematic adaptations, written mainly by Steve Kloves, have minimized or omitted important parts of Rowling's works, truncated flashbacks, omitted the prophecies and generally do not care who was related to whom, unless it had an impact on the main scenario. This is partly to create a feasible execution time and to bring in viewers who have not spent their time immersing themselves in Rowling's novels. If it's done today, there's no question that every slice of film that follows The prisoner of Azkaban (2004) would be split in two to make room for each plot. Whether or not this creates stronger films is debatable. the Fantastic beasts the films, in which Rowling plays the role of screenwriter for the first time, are invested in the connective tissue and various threads that another scriptwriter might omit for reasons of adaptation. And as such, what was originally a trilogy evolved into a total of five planned movies.

Rowling's novel and mythical approach to screenwriting is not exactly new, but rewards those who have invested their time in re-reading the series and in the Pottermorebut it stays true to Rowling's style and voice. A lot of The crimes of Grindelwald is built on name recognition, not blinkingly, but in order to show that each introduction and reference counts, whether it is now or later. Rowling's emphasis on the power of names in his expansion of Wizarding World by prequels is an alternative course of what Lucasfilm creates in their Star wars following trilogy.

Enter J.J. Abrams & # 39; the force awakens In 2015, one of the biggest questions was how these new characters, Rey, Finn, Poe and Kylo Ren, were related to the ancient guard of the characters introduced in the original Trilogy and the Prequels. From the apparent logical: Rey being the daughter of Luke Skywalker, to the socialite: Finn being the son of Lando or Mace Windu, the fans were delighted to see theories about how everything was connected. Although talk about The last Jedi can be considered completely exhausted, there is something that remains presumptuous of the fact that Rey has turned out to be "person", or perhaps more accurately, his own person without attachments to the fate of others. The only person of this new generation of Star wars The characters with a direct lineage of the past is Kylo Ren, and this factor left him divided and an emotional wreck. While Kylo struggles to integrate her identity with the concepts and names of the past, characters like Rey, Finn, Poe and Rose, who have no relationship, are free to create their own legacy and play an important role simply because they exist and not because they exist. they are pieces in a game of names. Despite The last Jedi Stating that Rey's past and filiation do not matter, some still hope to bring a more user-friendly response to fans in Abrams. Episode IX or one of the Star wars stories. Just this summer, fan theories and chronologies have emerged with the aim of suggesting that Rey is actually the offspring of SoloQi'ra and Darth Maul. Genetic issues aside (she would have at least some horns), this is probably not the direction that revelations about Rey are given. But the effort to get there, to give importance to names and family trees are not far from what Rowling does and she relies much more on these factors than on everything she does. Star wars what have they done.

In the center of The crimes of Grindelwald Credence Barebones' (Ezra Miller) tries to find his true kinship. As a dark, one of the most powerful magical beings that exists, Grindelwald seeks to claim it in his efforts to make war on the non-wizarding world, while a global coalition of 39 Aurors seeks to eliminate it before Grindelwald can seize it. Credibility, which is interesting, is a dark mirror image of Harry Potter himself. He is yet another abused boy who holds tremendous power for a so-called dictator. Still, Harry is defined by his last name. Despite his desire to be normal, to be anonymous, his name earned him allies, prestige and academic favors. The name Potter may be associated with a curse, but Harry is often blessed with it, and it is his family, lineage and love that spares him again and again. Harry Potter and his nickname "The Boy Who Lived" complements his sense of self and moral code. But Credence, who follows false after lightning, manipulated by Grindelwald and his followers, is indefinite and morally gray. He wants to be someone, to stand out, to count in the grand scheme of things. While Rowling plays with the idea that he is nobody, and like Rey, a unique entity, the revelations of the third act provide concrete answers and send more than a few gasps to a shocked audience. Once Credence crosses the path with Leta Lestrange (Zoe Kravitz) and that the secrets of the Lestrange family's history are revealed, he rightly becomes "The boy who died" once he's It's revealed to be someone who, unless a shot of fate, should not have existed at all.

The identity of Credence changes the course of the wizarding world myth that we thought we knew, and though the enthusiastic reactions of a movie broadcast by fans populated by a handful of people dressed in a cliché. Witch dress are a minor clue, it rewards those who have invested their time in the series. through its different forms of media. Of course, not everyone will be happy with this revelation, and Rowling's latest work has already been called fan fiction. This is an interesting criticism as it is Rowling's world with which she can play, but nevertheless, The crimes of Grindelwald is based on the importance of names and lineages, and those who count do so for this reason. It's interesting to see some of the backlash in The crimes of Grindelwald and Rowling's efforts to link Fantastic beasts at Harry Potter compared to the reaction received byThe last Jedi for being lost from previous entries and having outright killed characters considered staples of the franchise. This testifies to the sacredness we give to emblematic stories and raises the question of whether these goods have remained and will continue to be through the recognition of their name or their ability to grow by cutting the links that unite them.

[Readmore:1161687[Readmore:1161687[readmore:1161687[readmore:1161687]

Fantastic Beasts: The Grindelwald Crimes

[ad_2]
Source link