[ad_1]
<div _ngcontent-c15 = "" innerhtml = "
Warner Bros.
I was very grumpy when it was about the first Fantastic beasts movie. I was not thrilled to revive what was supposed to be a one-of-a-kind eight-part story in favor of increased ticketing and 3D fees abroad. disinterestedness. And the film itself, fantastic beasts and where to find them, was a disappointing mishmash of building the universe and forced flights. But it has earned $ 234 million nationally and $ 814 million globally on a $ 180 million budget. But what do you know? This suite looks great.
The trailers found a balance between the evil blacks (Johnny Depp's Grindelwald) and the whimsical heroes (Eddie Redmayne's Newt Scamander and Jude Law's Albus Dumbledore). In addition, the trailers offer a lot of action and show. More importantly, the filmmakers do not seem to be trying to imitate the fantasy of the age of the original. Harry Potter All this could be due to Warner Bros./Time Warner Inc.'s superb marketing departments (they cut the best trailers from all major studios) and I could put myself in a disappointing position. As there are four other films on the horizon, hope for the best.
There is in fact the most subtle subtle clues at 1:15 about the idea that Dumbledore is gay and that he feeds romantic feelings for the villain of the film in his youth. We have been told that there would be no explicit reference to Dumbledore's homosexuality, but we might have some subtle clues here and there for those who already know it. And since it's a fantastic $ 180 million blockbuster that has to bring a lot of money back to China, Russia and other overseas territories where explicit LGBTQIA content could be banned it may be all we can hope for now.
It seems like The crimes of Grindelwald try to be the Anger of Khan of the franchise. Robert Wise Star Trek: the movie, that I can and will defend, was a kind of reintroduction while feeling more comfortable with 2001: an odyssey of space than Star wars. Nicholas Meyer Anger of Khan did a tough action, offering a kind of U-boat adventure in the depths of space. He defines the model, in terms of tonality, production design, presentation and detailed narrative, for the rest of the period. Star Trek follow-up. In fact, you can say the same thing about Lions Gate Entertainment Viewed series.
Anyway, Anger of Khan actually less than The film ($ 79 million in 1982 versus $ 82 million in 1979), but it was a much cheaper film thanks to recycled sets ($ 12 million vs. $ 35 million) and it was so popular among fans and the general public that he set the pattern of the franchise. I like it a little (although Meyer The unknown country is my favorite), but I find the fans cult fun because it's just the kind of "Let's go Paramount / Viacom Inc." Star Trek in a blockbuster action! "Mentality that rubs so many fans in the wrong way when it comes to J.J. Abrams restarts the trilogy.
As long as The crimes of Grindelwald is a fantastic and fun adventure that attracts people for the next three movies, so it does not have to win as much fantastic beasts and where to find them. In any case, I would say that some of the big money in this film came from a generalized curiosity, so we can expect a slowdown. But the latest film directed by David Yates cost $ 180 million and has won 4.52 times in the world. As long as budgets remain below $ 200 million, I would say that $ 600 million – $ 650 million worldwide would be fine as long as the films are good enough to encourage the repetition of watching in the audience. Beyond post-theatrical.
Fantastic Beasts: The Grindelwald Crimes, written by JK Rowling, directed by David Yates and produced by Rowling, David Heyman, Steve Kloves and Lionel Wigram, opens on November 16, 2018. It stars Eddie Redmayne, Katherine Waterston, Dan Fogler, Alison Sudol, Ezra Miller , Jude Law, Johnny Depp, Zoë Kravitz, Callum Turner, Claudia Kim, William Nadylam, Kevin Guthrie, Carmen Ejogo and Poppy Corby-Tuech. This time, I hope to walk for the better. With my luck, it will be like The last Jedi where it will be exactly what I wanted from the last movie, but an online minority will convince the world that everyone hated it. It's not funny?
">
I was very grumpy when it was about the first Fantastic beasts movie. I was not thrilled to revive what was supposed to be a one-of-a-kind eight-part story in favor of increased ticketing and 3D fees abroad. disinterestedness. And the film itself, fantastic beasts and where to find them, was a disappointing mishmash of building the universe and forced flights. But it has earned $ 234 million nationally and $ 814 million globally on a $ 180 million budget. But what do you know? This suite looks great.
The trailers found a balance between the evil blacks (Johnny Depp's Grindelwald) and the whimsical heroes (Eddie Redmayne's Newt Scamander and Jude Law's Albus Dumbledore). In addition, the trailers offer a lot of action and show. More importantly, the filmmakers do not seem to be trying to imitate the fantasy of the age of the original. Harry Potter All this could be due to Warner Bros./Time Warner Inc.'s superb marketing departments (they cut the best trailers from all major studios) and I could put myself in a disappointing position. As there are four other films on the horizon, hope for the best.
There is in fact the most subtle subtle clues at 1:15 about the idea that Dumbledore is gay and that he feeds romantic feelings for the villain of the film in his youth. We have been told that there would be no explicit reference to Dumbledore's homosexuality, but we might have some subtle clues here and there for those who already know it. And since it's a fantastic $ 180 million blockbuster that has to bring a lot of money back to China, Russia and other overseas territories where explicit LGBTQIA content could be banned it may be all we can hope for now.
It seems like The crimes of Grindelwald try to be the Anger of Khan of the franchise. Robert Wise Star Trek: the movie, that I can and will defend, was a kind of reintroduction while feeling more comfortable with 2001: an odyssey of space than Star wars. Nicholas Meyer Anger of Khan did a tough action, offering a kind of U-boat adventure in the depths of space. He defines the model, in terms of tonality, production design, presentation and detailed narrative, for the rest of the period. Star Trek follow-up. In fact, you can say the same thing about Lions Gate Entertainment Viewed series.
Anyway, Anger of Khan actually less than The film ($ 79 million in 1982 versus $ 82 million in 1979), but it was a much cheaper film thanks to recycled sets ($ 12 million vs. $ 35 million) and it was so popular among fans and the general public that he set the pattern of the franchise. I like it a little (although Meyer The unknown country is my favorite), but I find the fans cult fun because it's just the kind of "Let's go Paramount / Viacom Inc." Star Trek in a blockbuster action! "Mentality that rubs so many fans in the wrong way when it comes to J.J. Abrams restarts the trilogy.
As long as The crimes of Grindelwald is a fantastic and fun adventure that attracts people for the next three movies, so it does not have to win as much fantastic beasts and where to find them. In any case, I would say that some of the big money in this film came from a generalized curiosity, so we can expect a slowdown. But the latest film directed by David Yates cost $ 180 million and has won 4.52 times in the world. As long as budgets remain below $ 200 million, I would say that $ 600 million – $ 650 million worldwide would be fine as long as the films are good enough to encourage the repetition of watching in the audience. Beyond post-theatrical.
Fantastic Beasts: The Grindelwald Crimes, written by JK Rowling, directed by David Yates and produced by Rowling, David Heyman, Steve Kloves and Lionel Wigram, opens on November 16, 2018. It stars Eddie Redmayne, Katherine Waterston, Dan Fogler, Alison Sudol, Ezra Miller , Jude Law, Johnny Depp, Zoë Kravitz, Callum Turner, Claudia Kim, William Nadylam, Kevin Guthrie, Carmen Ejogo and Poppy Corby-Tuech. This time, I hope to walk for the better. With my luck, it will be like The last Jedi where it will be exactly what I wanted from the last movie, but an online minority will convince the world that everyone hated it. It's not funny?
