Facebook Failed to Police How It Works Handled User Data



[ad_1]

The last month of the last decade of the past.

Facebook's loose oversight of the partnership was detected by the company's government-approved privacy monitor in 2013. But it was never revealed to the users of the company. Ron Wyden, the Oregon Democrat, a privacy advocate and frequent critic of the social media giant.

In the letter, a copy of which Mr. Wyden provided to the New York Times, Facebook wrote that by early 2013 it had entered into data-sharing agreements with seven devices makers to provide what it called the "Facebook experience" – custom-built software, typically, that gives those manufacturers' customers access to Facebook on their phones. These partnerships, some of which date to at least 2010, fall under agreement with the Federal Trade Commission drafted in 2011 and intended to oversee the company's privacy practices.

Facebook gone on entered dozens of similar data-sharing partnerships, most of the company has done it. The firm used some of the information in efforts to help President Trump's 2016 campaign.

When a team from PricewaterhouseCoopers conducted the initial F.T.C.-mandated assessment in 2013, it tested Facebook's partnerships with Microsoft and Research in Motion, maker of the BlackBerry handset. In both cases, PricewaterhouseCoopers found only "limited evidence" that Facebook has checked or checked its partners' compliance with its data use policies. This finding was made public by PricewaterhouseCoopers' report released by the F.T.C. in June.

"Facebook claimed that its data-sharing partnerships with smartphones were on the up," Mr. Wyden said. "Purpose Facebook's own, handpicked auditors said the company was not monitoring what smartphone manufacturers did with Americans' personal information, or making sure that these manufacturers are following Facebook's own policies." He added, "It's not good enough to just take the word of Facebook – or any major corporation – that's their personal information. "

In a statement, a Facebook spokeswoman said, "We take the F.T.C. She added, "We remain strongly committed to the consensus and to the protection of people's information."

Facebook, like other companies under F.T.C. consent decree, largely dictates the scope of each assessment. In two subsequent assessments, the company has been seemingly less stringent policy with data partners. On those two, Facebook had to show that its partners had agreed to its data use policies.

A Wyden helps the person who has reviewed the issues. The Facebook spokeswoman did not directly address the 2013 test failure, or the company's apparent decision to change the test in question.

Because the United States has no general consumer privacy law, F.T.C. consent decrees have emerged as the federal government of the United States of America. In letters and congressional testimony, F.T.C. have pointed to the evidence of robust consumer protection in the United States.

A spokesperson for PricewaterhouseCoopers acknowledges the fact that it is a test of the market.

The spokesman said, "Changes to controls may occur as evolve platforms, such that a controlled test in one period may not be identical in a subsequent period.

Facebook's letter disclosing the assessors' findings came into question Mr. Wyden was raised during an intelligence hearing in September. The hearing was held just weeks after The Times reported that Facebook had data-sharing deals with dozens of phone and tablet manufacturers, including Microsoft, BlackBerry and Amazon.

While the assessment reports were made by the F.T.C. in June, they included significant redactions, which Facebook and PricewaterhouseCoopers said were necessary to protect trade secrets.

Mr. Wyden, whose staff has been consulted, said he said, "very troubling" and "repressed" Sheryl Sandberg, Facebook's chief operating officer, to release them in their entirety.

The Electronic Privacy Information Center, a Washington-based consumer rights group, believes that the current consensus is that it is currently in place for the full-fledged assessment of the FTA. is policing privacy violations.

"What is clear is that the F.T.C. "said Marc Rotenberg, president of the privacy rights group. "And this has come to enormous cost to American consumers."

The F.T.C. declined to comment.

Facebook's compliance with the consent decree is the subject of a new F.T.C. investigation opened in the wake of the Cambridge Analytica scandal.

In the letter last month, Facebook's vice president for the United States public policy, Kevin Martin, noted that the assessors' findings have been made to increase the risk of corruption. that it was protecting its users' privacy.

It remains unclear whether Facebook has had its vote. A spokeswoman declined to provide any examples of the company's doing so.

A BlackBerry official, who declined to discuss details of the data-sharing agreement, said BlackBerry did not think that Facebook had ever audited its data use, but noted that BlackBerry's business model links to protecting users' personal information.

[ad_2]
Source link