"Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald": 7 questions we wish to answer in the third film



[ad_1]

The last installment of the Fantastic beasts franchise, The crimes of Grindelwald, take Harry Potter the fans in another thrilling adventure across the wizarding world of the 1920s – trading in New York for Paris as Newt Scamander (Eddie Redmayne) and his magical menagerie board for a mission from Albus Dumbledore himself (Jude Law, playing the role of a young, gifted Hogwarts instructor) to prevent a rising black wizard from conquering the muggle population.

This magician is Gellart Grindelwald, played this time by a controversial castJohnny Depp, who wears an iconic blue touch and a familiar fascist vision of how the people born of magic should take the rightful place as the governess of its less powerful and non-magical neighbors. Crimes of Grindelwald is all about the first moves, from Dumbledore maneuvering Newt across Europe to the final recruiting ceremony of the dark wizard's madman, and while the film answered a few remaining questions from the first – and gave us more information about some new characters and plot points in the Potter Cannon – As the second film in a series of five planned films, he has introduced much more loose detail than he has tied up, dropping a huge amount of history. in his 133 minutes of execution.

Here are seven of our biggest questions remaining. We hope to find an answer in the third film, which has no title yet, of the Fantastic beasts series:

1. What is the true story of Credence Barebone's identity?

Ezra Miller Lost orphan spent most of the film in search of the truth about his identity. And while the final revelation of Grindelwald – that Credence is, in fact, Aurelius Dumbledore, Albus's brother – was to change the rules of the game and topple us into the mythology of the next Fantastic beasts film, the logistical family ties have already Potter fans scratching their heads.

During some research, it seems unlikely that Albus' father, Percival Dumbledore, could have begot Aurelius before being sent to Azkaban and, ultimately, after his death, in 1890 – Credence was born at the turn The film is currently set in 1927. It is possible that Aurelius is a half-brother, although it is clear that the mysteries of the Dumbledore family are only beginning to dissipate.

Another prevalent theory is that Credence is not actually Dumbledore's brother, but that the Obscurus inside of him is somehow related to Dumbledore's younger sister, Ariana, who died at 14 years after a horrible attack that traumatized her for years. Is it possible that his Obscurus continues to live – and that Grindelwald plans to use it in his revenge against Dumbledore?

2. Will we ever find this timeline?

Aside from the issue of Credence's filiation, there also seems to be some difficulty with Professor McGonagall's appearance in Hogwarts flashbacks, which occurred almost a decade before Minerva McGonagall. Potter series is even born – yet, she already teaches? It may be a family member with the same name, or maybe there are Time-Turner antics in play, but in any case, the fans will surely be looking for of answers in future payments.

3. What does it mean that Dumbledore now has the oath of blood?

Naughty Niffler from Newt may have saved the situation once again by munching on his charm in Grindelwald's last judgment, but what role will the gemstone – which contains a drop of blood from both Grindelwald and Dumbledore – play in the story to come? How will Dumbledore overcome the unbreakable oath and end up defeating Grindelwald?

In addition, will we have more eyes on Dumbledore's desires in the Mirror of Erised as his relationship with Grindelwald moves towards his fatal end?

4. Is Leta Lestrange really dead?

It may be wishful thinking on our part, but we had just met the mysterious and troubled witch (played by Zoe Kravitz), Who shares a deep relationship with Newt and his brother Theseus – bolstering friendship with the first at Hogwarts but engaged to the last of these days – when she died, turning against the offer Grindelwald's acceptance before being demolished by the cerulean hell of the wizard.

The death of Leta marks a significant loss for the Scamander brothers, certainly, but it also marks a hole in Potter Cannon who has fans wondering if she's really gone for good. If Credence is really a Dumbledore – and do not the last living Lestrange – and Leta's brother, Corvus, actually died at sea, so his death would seem to mark the end of the family lineage. However, we do know at least some other Lestranges that appear in the following years, including Rodolphus, whose wife, Bellatrix, became the Death Eater who fought alongside Lord Voldemort – and was described by Helena Bonham Carter in the Potter movies.

So Leta, or another member of her family, must live. At the very least, his memory will certainly be invoked in future films to inform Newt's relationship with Theseus, as well as his new emerging love, Tina (Katherine Waterston). Hoping that she is here to see it.

5. Did Queenie really go to the dark side?

What a misfortune to make one of the most likeable characters of the first film the first to fall in love with Grindelwald – and do it only because she wants to be able to love a muggle man without making fun of his peers ? It's a noble, well-drawn metaphor, but it falls a bit here without the screen time needed to look at Queenie's (Alison Sudol) the pain or distress she feels from the wicked wizard's message. (Meanwhile, his powers of legilimency seem to be almost no longer used in this film.)

Despite everything, despite his dark turn – which was hinted at the beginning of the film with his willingness to use a love potion on Jacob (Dan Fogler) – Some fans still hope that his new position in the inner circle of Grindelwald is strategic in a way, a factory for good guys. Time will tell how much the dark side's appeal has become powerful on one of the brightest beams of light in the franchise.

6. Will we ever learn more about Nagini?

After the controversy surrounding the cast of Depp this summer, reactions have been expressed after the revelation of the South Korean actress Claudia Kim would embody Nagini, a Maledictus who would eventually become Lord Voldemort's companion and eventually Horcrux – dedicated to carrying a piece of the wizard's evil soul until his death at the Battle of Hogwarts.

In Crimes of Grindelwaldwe meet the human form of Nagini – playing in the same circus as Credence, following his escape from New York – but that's about it. We are told that eventually she will not be able to escape her snake form, and we watch her escape the oppressive life of the circus and join Credence in her quest for true identity, but we do not have the time to To consider how one or the other of these things things really affect it. The film did not assure fans that there was an interesting story to tell here, a bad service rendered to one of the few Asian characters in the franchise, and future movies will have to work hard for show how Nagini goes from dissident – standing alongside his brave wizards on the bridge of Hogwarts after rejecting and escaping from Grindelwald – to a nasty servant on the right of the next Dark Lord.

7. Did Grindelwald really say that he could have stopped the Second World War?

This seems to be the case. With a trail on his skull-shaped magic hookah (seriously), Depp's evil ruler pleaded for his magical reign by showing the wizards gathered the vision of the coming horrors in the muggle world – including, as does wonder Jacob, "another war?"

We know the Fantastic beasts The series plans to expand until 1945, which means that a version of the gigantic world conflict will certainly be at least the bottom of future witch intrigues. However, the perspective of an outgoing government leader who advocates for systemic suppression by saying he will use it to stop the Nazis may not be ideal.

RELATED CONTENT:

[ad_2]
Source link