[ad_1]
White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders called Ms. Christine Blasey Ford's testimony "convincing", but probably false, and defended this characterization on Sunday.
Huckabee Sanders appeared in "Fox News Sunday" to describe how the Trump administration "did not handle the management" of the Kavanaugh Supreme Court process of the Senate. But presenter Chris Wallace questioned President Donald Trump and herself, claiming that Ford's testimony was "hard-hitting" while being labeled "fool's eye". On Saturday, Trump tweeted that NBC News had "erroneously reported" that he "restricted" the FBI's investigation into sexual assault charges against Judge Brett Kavanaugh.
Wallace played a clip showing President Trump, who was questioned Thursday about Ford's testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee. Trump commented, "I thought her testimony was very convincing and she looks like a very good woman to me, very good woman.Sure, she was a very credible witness, she was very good at in many ways. "
Wallace asked Huckabee Sanders to describe, as a woman and press secretary of the White House, how did Ford's testimony affect her personally and how did she explain that she could be so convincing? , as believable and you thought you were wrong? "
"Anyone who looks at this can not ignore the fact that it causes emotion," said Sanders. "But it's not a question of emotion, it's a matter of fact. And all the facts are on the side of Brett Kavanaugh, certainly in all the information that was gathered during this hearing. There was no corroboration. "
"There was no factual information that supported the prosecution," replied Sanders. "Just as convincing, if not more, Brett Kavanaugh. And you emphasize that I am a woman, I am also a mother. I have a daughter and I have two sons. And I think it's a very, very dangerous place and a very dangerous way for America to come down, just take a charge and make it a reality. "
But Wallace continued to press her on the dichotomy, referring to Trump's Thursday tweet on Kavanaugh audiences. "The strategy of seeking and destroying Democrats is shameful and this process has been a total sham and an effort to delay, obstruct and resist."
"How does the president … explain that she could be so credible and so specific by putting Kavanaugh and one of his best friends, Mark Judge, in this piece?" And be wrong about this? You say that you think something has happened. Not necessarily with Kavanaugh. How does he explain it?
"I do not think any of us can know 100%," replied Sanders. "There is no doubt that his story is heartbreaking and it is heartbreaking to watch it. I watched it several times. "
Earlier in the interview, Sanders repeatedly described how Ford's accusations against Kavanaugh caused great excitement, but did not mean that Kavanaugh was the attacker.
"But no one can deny that his testimony is not convincing, that it has not had an impact," added Sanders. "And it's obvious that something has happened to this woman. And I do not think there is anyone in America who would tolerate that or who would accept that. I think the big question is: was it Brett Kavanaugh? And I think that based on his testimony and the information he provided, you can easily leave and say that's not the case?
[ad_2]
Source link
