Former UConn coach Kevin Ollie faces charge of unethical conduct



[ad_1]

The NCAA struck former UConn coach Kevin Ollie with a charge of unethical conduct, among other things, on Friday night, following his investigation into UConn's basketball program.

The most serious charge among the five included in the original allegations made to both Ollie and the university on Friday is a charge of unethical Level I conduct. The NCAA alleged that Ollie had provided "False or misleading information" on FaceTime calls between Ray Allen, Rudy Gay and a former recruit. The NCAA also alleged that Ollie knew that professional coach and friend Derek Hamilton were running training sessions with players.

Ollie was fired from UConn in March in the midst of NCAA violations and investigations, barely four years after leading the Huskies to an NCAA championship. The university cited the "just cause" in dismissing him because of the allegations.

Ollie is preparing for arbitration with UConn to fight this decision and has repeatedly denied allegations against him.

<p class = "canvas-atom-canvas-text Mb (1.0em) Mb (0) – smt Mt (0.8em) – sm" type = "text" content = "Coach Ollie strongly disagrees with the details of the allegations made in the NCAA notification and is disappointed that the NCAA has chosen to align with the University of Connecticut in the pending arbitration, said lawyer Friday. Olivier Jacques Parenteau. "The Ollie coach has been denied conduct that would constitute a breach of the rules and regulations of the NCAA and looks forward to defending himself and restoring his reputation.""data-reactid =" 26 ">Coach Ollie strongly disagrees with the details of the allegations made in the NCAA notification and is disappointed that the NCAA has chosen to align with the University of Connecticut in the pending arbitration, said lawyer Friday. Olivier Jacques Parenteau. "The Ollie coach has been denied conduct that would constitute a breach of the rules and regulations of the NCAA and looks forward to defending himself and restoring his reputation."

What did the NCAA specifically claim?

Specifically, the NCAA alleged that:

  • Ollie and his staff had unacceptable contacts with recruits.
  • Free meals provided to recruits.
  • Arranged phone calls and FaceTime calls with Allen, Gay and a rookie, and later denied it.
  • Provided complimentary admission to a road match in Hamilton, who was the father of a UConn football rookie at the time.
  • Provided free sports clothing to a rookie.
  • Exceeding the NCAA limit on recruiting days by two.
  • Coaching limit exceeded by UConn.
  • Ollie made free kicks with a rookie on campus.
  • Ollie knew Hamilton was providing free training sessions, and later refused.
  • Exceeding limits on practice times.
  • Impossible to promote an atmosphere of conformity.

The allegations regarding FaceTime phone calls and calls with Allen and Gay and the Hamilton training sessions are the only Level I allegations. All other allegations are Level II allegations.

What's next for Ollie, UConn?

Ollie now has 90 days to answer the NCAA. If the allegations resist, he could be penalized by a "show" order, which would penalize him if he was hired into a program in the future.

The NCAA Offenses Committee will make the final decisions regarding the allegations and any other penalties imposed on Ollie and / or UConn.

UConn was not found guilty in the NOA, but could still face penalties arising from these allegations and the investigation.

"Notification of NCAA allegations is part of a process we expected," UConn said in a statement Friday night. "We believe that his allegations are consistent with our initial internal findings and our joint investigation work with law enforcement personnel. We maintain that the measures we have taken to date remain appropriate and consistent with the type, nature and seriousness of the allegations received.

"While the allegations are a disappointment for the university, our student athletes and our coaches, and certainly for the entire UConn nation, we firmly believe that we have made difficult but appropriate decisions to protect the accountability, the integrity and the integrity of the community. The integrity and success of our sport program. now and in the future. "

Ollie's arbitration process with UConn

Ollie's process with the NCAA and these allegations is totally different from Ollie's fight against the university and the arbitration process they are involved with.

UConn cited the "justification" for his dismissal at the beginning of the year and revealed his reasons in a March letter, accompanied by more than 1,350 documents detailing certain NCAA offenses.

Quoting the "just cause" allows UConn to dismiss Ollie without paying him the remaining $ 10.6 million that was left on his contract, until 2021. Ollie disputes this claim.

The findings of the NCAA's investigation, as well as any subsequent findings, rulings or sanctions that the NCAA could have given in the case could improve UConn's argument in Ollie's remand.

<p class = "canvas-atom-canvas-text Mb (1.0em) Mb (0) – smt Mt (0.8em) – sm" type = "text" content = "More from Yahoo Sports:
• Ryder Cup: Americans went wild after being slaughtered in the afternoon
• Kimberley A. Martin: Rams' star is strong enough to face L.A.
• FBI investigates MLB for its relationships with international players
• Pete Thamel: The rapid increase of OSU QB, Dwayne Haskins, is phenomenal
"data-reactid =" 53 ">More from Yahoo Sports:
• Ryder Cup: Americans went wild after being slaughtered in the afternoon
• Kimberley A. Martin: Rams' star is strong enough to face L.A.
• FBI investigates MLB for its relationships with international players
• Pete Thamel: The rapid increase of OSU QB, Dwayne Haskins, is phenomenal

[ad_2]
Source link