From Hero to Pariah, Aung San Suu Kyi Burst into Myanmar


[ad_1]

BANGKOK – Over a period of one month, U Ngar Min Swe, a pro-military editorialist, wrote 10 short Facebook posts accusing Daw Aung San Suu Kyi, Myanmar's civil leader, of corruption and division of the country. In a message, without naming it, he suggested that she was a "prostitute crazy about power".

After the police laid charges of sedition, a judge found him guilty and sentenced him this month to seven years in prison.

Ms. Aung San Suu Kyi's government could have prevented the case from being tried. But for the winner of the Nobel Peace Prize and the only icon of democracy, the suppression of critics has become the hallmark of her leadership.

"If the government continues in this direction, we will never succeed in democracy and we will become a dictatorship again," said Maung Saungkha, a defender of freedom of expression who served six months in prison under the previous government.

Much of the world had high hopes for Myanmar two and a half years ago when Aung San Suu Kyi came to power.

So much has changed.

Formerly a symbol of resistance to military rule, Ms. Aung San Suu Kyi is known today as a facilitator of ethnic cleansing and an enemy of press freedom. The hope that she is using the majority of her party in Parliament to encourage much-needed economic growth and to abolish oppressive laws has faded.

Now, about mid-way through the five-year term of its National League for Democracy party, Myanmar is likely to become a pariah again, as it was under the rule of the generals who had previously placed it under house arrest.

"Rarely has a leader's reputation been lost so fast, so fast," concluded a recent report by the International Crisis Group based in Brussels.

Since August, Western powers and international organizations have taken significant steps to punish Myanmar for using rape, arson and killings by its army to drive more than 700,000 Rohingya Muslims out of the country. country. The United States imposed targeted sanctions, a UN mission called the generals to face charges of genocide and the judges of the International Criminal Court decided that they had the power to investigate the case.

According to Ms. Nyo Nyo Thin, one of the missed opportunities is the failure of the abolition of hundreds of repressive laws inherited from the time of the military dictatorship or even of British colonial rule, just like the law on official secrets, used to prosecute the two Reuters reporters. .

Instead, according to the report, officials of his government spread false stories, denied that the army had committed a wrongdoing, monitored the destruction of evidence and blocked independent investigations, including that of the mission. United Nations.

"By their acts and omissions, the civil authorities have contributed to the commission of crimes of atrocities," concluded the 444-page report. which was presented to the United Nations Human Rights Council in Geneva on September 18th.

Also this month, the International Criminal Court has said it has the power to investigate the expulsion of the Rohingya as a crime against humanity. President Win Myint said that Myanmar was not obliged to respect the decision because it had not signed the treaty creating the court. But Bangladesh has signed it and the court said the crimes had continued in that country, giving it jurisdiction.

The well-known atrocities also appear to have undermined Myanmar's efforts to attract foreign direct investment, which one official said last week that it had dropped in 2016 and 2017 because of the Rohingya problem.

Some officials and analysts fear that Myanmar is moving towards the kind of isolation it has experienced during decades of absolute military rule.

"The pressure on this government is much worse than on the military government," said U Win Htein, former advisor to Ms. Aung San Suu Kyi. He added that Myanmar, recently adopted by the West as a result of a dictatorship, now relied on China and Russia to protect itself from the possible sanctions of the United Nations Security Council.

"The military government has been championed by Russia and China," said Win Htein. "Now, the irony is that this government is protected by Russia and China."

[ad_2]Source link