[ad_1]
In a video leaked to Breitbart News, Google's legal director, Kent Walker, accidentally invoked the statement by FCC chairman Ajit Pai that market forces would prevent service providers from accessing censorship.
Breitbart News got a one-hour video on Wednesday at a company-wide meeting shortly after the 2016 presidential election, revealing Google's determination to thwart President Donald Trump's agenda. the global populist movement. The video also revealed some of the company's reflections on the controversial technology policy known as Network Neutrality.
The FCC of the Obama era passed the Open Internet Order in 2015, which regulated the Internet as a public utility and established that ISPs such as Comcast or Verizon could not block, restrict or censor the content of their networks. Critics have estimated that the rule would stifle Internet freedom, while proponents have suggested that rules are needed to prevent censorship of ISPs. The FCC, under the current president Ajit Pai, subsequently canceled the network's neutrality last December.
In the 28-minute, 50-second Breitbart News video, a Google employee asked Google's group of executives, "Trump's likely choice for Jeffrey Eisenach, president of the FCC, is anti-Silicon Valley and opposes the neutrality of the Net. What measures do we plan to protect the fair use of the Internet?
Walker responded to the part of the question about net neutrality saying that there would be "a ebb and flow" when it would act to discuss Net Neutrality. Google's legal manager continued:
With regard to net neutrality, we hope that the tradition of intrusion into the circulation of data, which has been established for some ten years, takes shape after a certain time and compels public opinion and it is increasingly difficult for carriers to inappropriately interfere in what people can see.
Walker argues in this response about net neutrality that public opinion and market forces will continue to make it "harder and harder" for ISPs to censor and unjustly block content. The typical argument of net neutrality suggests that the broadband market is not competitive enough for competition in the market to prevent ISPs from censoring content; Walker's statement contradicts the standard argument of network neutrality and instead suggests that the country does not need net neutrality rules to prevent ISPs from unfairly blocking the content.
This is the same argument put forward by President Pai in his "Restoring Internet Freedom Order" that canceled the order of neutrality of 2015.
Pai explained:
Instead, we find that the best solution is to free Internet traffic exchange agreements from heavy governmental regulation and allow market forces to discipline this emerging and competitive market. It is telling that, in the absence of Title II regulation, the cost of Internet transit has exceeded 99% on the basis of cost per megabit from 2005 to 2015. In addition, we find that even commentators who insist that FAIs exercise undue power in the interconnect market, there is no indication that ISPs generally charge supra-competitive prices for Internet traffic exchange agreements.
Walker's assertion that market forces will prevent Internet service providers from censoring is far from 2014, when Google and about 150 other technology companies sent a letter to the FCC, saying that if they adopted rules allowing ISPs to establish "fast lanes" represent a "serious threat to the Internet".
In a November speech, President Pai stressed that social media companies are a greater threat to freedom of expression than ISPs.
"I love Twitter and I use it all the time," Pai said. "But let us not fool ourselves; Regarding an open Internet, Twitter is part of the problem. Society has a point of view and uses this point of view to discriminate.
In a September article, Pai also said that the country needs to think seriously about whether these social media giants should comply with the requirements of "new transparency" regarding their censorship and confidentiality practices. Pai also called Facebook, Google and Twitter Internet "gatekeepers".
When the FCC repealed the network neutrality regulation in December, Google issued a statement claiming that the rules governing public services enjoyed "overwhelming public support" and that they would continue to demand more of protection against ISPs.
Google said in December: "We remain committed to network neutrality policies, which enjoy overwhelming public support, have been approved by the courts, and work well for every part of the Internet economy. We will work with other supporters of network neutrality, big and small, to promote strong and enforceable protections. "
Google's statement on #NetNeutrality repeal. pic.twitter.com/WVgmswBCJW
– Mark Bergen (@mhbergen) December 14, 2017
As Matthew Berry, FCC chief of staff, said in a tweet on Thursday, the Internet continues to remain "free and open" despite the repeal of net neutrality.
Berry wrote, "Day 95 of the Post-Title II era: The Internet is free and open, and it's National Day of Defensive Superstition. Now, excuse me while I'm walking under a ladder and then breaking a mirror. . . "
Day 95 of the Post Title II era: The Internet is free and open, and it is the National Day of Defensive Superstition. Now, excuse me while I'm walking under a ladder and then breaking a mirror. . .
– Matthew Berry (@matthewberryfcc) September 13, 2018
[ad_2]
Source link
