How do astronauts become sick of space? Physics explains



[ad_1]

reo astronauts are sick of space when they travel from Earth to the International Space Station? – Class 3E students, Ferny Grove State School, Brisbane.

it's a great question. If any of the students in Class 3E have the opportunity to fly into space, hit an anti-nausea patch and get started! The discomfort caused by the evil of space is real, but if it happens to you, it will be brief and you will remember the experience of traveling in space forever.

Yes, astronauts can get sick of space when they go to the International Space Station. It is less likely to travel in the Russian spacecraft Soyuz used to transport astronauts to the narrow than in the old space shuttle used until in 2011. The ability to move in the Space Shuttle increased the chances of space sickness. Space sickness affects up to half of the astronauts during their first few days on the space station.

See also: Why not throw up on Space Camp astronaut astronaut simulator

The idea that an astronaut roars in his space helmet seems funny, or embarrassing, at first. However, as astronaut Mike Mullane explained in his biography, it could prove fatal, especially if the astronaut was walking in space. The vomit could stain the inside of the helmet, blinding the astronaut. And because it could not be removed, it could be inhaled or clog their oxygen circulation system.

These days, astronauts travel to the International Space Station via the Russian Soyuz satellite.
These days, astronauts travel to the International Space Station via the Russian Soyuz satellite.

What are the causes of the evil of space?

As you probably know, the gravity is lower inside the International Space Station. Gravity is the force that draws us to the ground. The low gravity in the space allows astronauts to float, which sounds very fun, but can help to cause the evil of space.

The evil of space is the nausea and disorientation felt by many astronauts. NASA uses the term "space adaptation syndrome" instead of space sickness. It describes the problem more precisely because it is a question of the astronaut who has trouble adjusting to zero gravity in space. The cause of the evil of space is still not completely understood.

Recent experiments show that the evil of space is related to our inner ear. Two distinct parts of the inner ear respond to sudden rotation and directional changes. If you shake or move your head very quickly, you may feel dizzy and some people may even feel sick. However, this normally happens very quickly.

This normal reaction is disrupted by low gravity – your inner ear thinks you're moving constantly. It takes a while to adapt to the new condition of weightlessness. This worsens if you move your head while your body is still adapting. This is the reason why previous astronauts traveling in the largest space shuttle were more prone to space sickness than the current astronauts traveling in the Soyuz spacecraft at close quarters, because in a confined space they were less likely to move their heads.

Space sickness affects many astronauts, or even half of them, the early days of the space station.
Space sickness affects many astronauts, or even half of them, the early days of the space station.

The evil of space was not discussed in the first space missions. The original spaceships Mercury and Gemini were, like the current Soyuz, in the cramped. It was only after the Apollo and subsequent missions that space sickness became a concern for NASA.

See also: 60 things you did not know about NASA on the occasion of the Space Agency's 60th anniversary

In 1983, the first detailed study was conducted aboard a space shuttle flight (STS-7) by an astronaut-doctor. Norm Thagard. His studies and all subsequent studies were hampered by the astronauts themselves. None of them wanted to admit that he was sick of the space. They feared that mission control would prevent them from participating in spacewalks, or worse, that they would not be included in subsequent space missions.


This article was originally published on The Conversation by Kevin Orrman-Rossiter. Read the original article here.

[ad_2]
Source link