[ad_1]
OAKLAND – The Raiders were faced with a fourth downhill and five meters late in the fourth quarter. They lost 14 points, desperately trying to make a comeback and stop a long series of defeats.
Derek Carr took the picture and waited for Jalen Richard to fight through the defensive line and get ready for a throw. The pressure went up, with Melvin Ingram facing Carr. Richard was covered all the time.
The room, as conceived, was dead. Carr threw it in the grass.
A problem: a decline in turnover essentially helped to block a loss. The Raiders' fans were upset by the decision to concede in this situation, hoping that Carr could have improvised or abandoned it to the possibility of a downward conversion.
This was not the case and a fifth consecutive loss was ensured. Chargers 20, Raiders 6.
The offensive, and the passing game in particular, has experienced serious difficulties. The Raiders did not score any touchdown in nine quarters. The frustration in the locker room and in the fans set reaches a critical mass.
Saying uncle on the 4th and 5th did not help much.
"We tried to play big," said Gruden. "It was a game designed for the man to man, we were trying to generate a pick for our back half. Give credit to San Diego, they made an excellent play. We were looking for a big coin in this situation and the Chargers smothered it. I take credit for this gaming call there. I have to see what happened. The piece was designed for Jalen Richard. I did not know how much I was standing up. But, it seemed like Melvin Ingram III was beating him. This is one of many pieces that cost us the match today. "
A game call in this situation with only one legitimate option could and will be questioned, as Gruden suggests, but it was not the only one.
The Raiders also failed to score a goal in the fourth and end of the game in the first series, using a flick that did not cross the goal line.
The Raiders moved the ball well, but they failed to hit him. They went to 0 for 3 in the red zone.
The rolling on the socks was one of those offensive failures. The game was designed for Richard, and Carr said there was no other option than the Raiders.
"No, not in this case," Carr said. "It's literally – it's Jalen. The blanket they play and everything, the way we designed it – it's Jalen. I would have liked to be able to do something else. You know. I do not want to lose. Obviously, that sucks. We will talk about it this week. It's really designed for Jalen and they covered it. "
Carr could not wait any longer, not after Ingram turned around Brandon Parker and bet on the quarterback. It was either a bag or a disposable at that time, with the main option hidden.
Carr did not think he was in the position to race for a first win with Ingram.
"I would have certainly been fired by No. 54, but I wish – absolutely, yes. We could have had something different to take that first place, "Carr said. "It hurts."
Social media fans were unhappy that Carr threw it, and several members of the media (including myself) raised an eyebrow.
NFL Network analyst David Carr, Derek's older brother, defended Derek Carr's decision in these difficult times.
It's a screen, it's covered, throwing it at your feet is the only option. This person actually has a blue check to be a senior writer for @cbs https://t.co/bVr7oPFleD
– David Carr (@ DCarr8) November 11, 2018
[ad_2]
Source link
