Is Jim Acosta's decision truly a victory for freedom of the press? I do not think so [VIDEO]



[ad_1]

CNN's chief correspondent for the White House, Jim Acosta, is back in the White House thanks to a federal judge who ruled in his favor.

But is this decision really a victory for "freedom of the press" as some say?

I do not think so. His suspension was not an attack on a "free press" at all. Acosta was suspended for an incident that occurred during a press conference during which he got his hands on an intern who had tried to take him a microphone. Keep in mind Acosta has gotten used to being rude and disruptive.

Whether you like the President and his administration, you should always show the Chair the respect it deserves. (RELATED: CNN sues the White House against the revoked powers of Jim Acosta)

I hope that Acosta learned something from his temporary suspension, even though I do not hold my breath.
________________________________________________

The opinions expressed in this comment are those of the author and do not reflect the official position of The Daily Caller.

Watch TheDC's fantastic videos and subscribe to our YouTube channel so you do not miss it.

SUBSCRIBE!

Discover now the most popular programs of Daily Caller:

Kaesernick and many customers revolt

Exclusive Interview with President Donald Trump in the Oval Office of the Daily Caller

Would you rather go out with a Trump supporter or an MS-13 gang member?

New details on "extremist Muslim" complex in New Mexico

"Trophy culture" diverts New Jersey high school supporters

White House Truth Survey in North Korea

Democrats' New Campaign Message: "Drain the Swamp"

"Fake News" defends the brutal gang MS-13

Follow Stéphanie Hamill on Twitter

[ad_2]
Source link